Effectiveness of Inpatient Rehabilitation for Older Adults Soon After Dialysis Initiation to Improve Health Outcomes.

IF 9.4 1区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Ismay Van Loon,Shepherd Kajawo,Eric McArthur,Danielle M Nash,Lima F Rodrigues,Stephanie N Dixon,Amit X Garg,Jamie L Fleet,Blayne Welk,S Vanita Jassal
{"title":"Effectiveness of Inpatient Rehabilitation for Older Adults Soon After Dialysis Initiation to Improve Health Outcomes.","authors":"Ismay Van Loon,Shepherd Kajawo,Eric McArthur,Danielle M Nash,Lima F Rodrigues,Stephanie N Dixon,Amit X Garg,Jamie L Fleet,Blayne Welk,S Vanita Jassal","doi":"10.1053/j.ajkd.2025.06.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE\r\nMultiple studies have shown that older adults' initiation of dialysis is associated with functional decline often within months of starting treatment. This functional impairment has been associated with a 2- to 4-fold higher risk of mortality and morbidity. This study sought to assess if rehabilitation within the first few months after starting dialysis may improve physical function and reduce the rates of hospitalization and mortality.\r\n\r\nSTUDY DESIGN\r\nRetrospective matched cohort study.\r\n\r\nSETTING & PARTICIPANTS\r\nIndividuals in Ontario, Canada, aged ≥66 years initiating maintenance dialysis whose healthcare data were recorded by ICES, which captures administrative health data for the population of Ontario.\r\n\r\nEXPOSURE\r\nInpatient rehabilitation care within 6 months of starting dialysis.\r\n\r\nOUTCOMES\r\nChange in the Functional Independence Measure (FIM®) score during the rehabilitation hospitalization among those receiving rehabilitation. Counts of hospital days, rates of admission to hospitals and long-term care facilities, and mortality over one year following the index date for comparisons of those who received rehabilitation to those who did not.\r\n\r\nANALYTICAL APPROACH\r\nPatients receiving rehabilitation and three times as many not receiving rehabilitation were matched using a propensity score logistic regression model. Outcomes among those who did and did not receive rehabilitation were compared using Cox proportional hazards models and the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test for binary outcomes.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nAmong those undergoing rehabilitation, FIM® scores improved from 76±17 at admission, to 98±19 by discharge (p<0.0001). 1287 of 1567 (82%) patients admitted for rehabilitation within 6 months of dialysis were matched to 3861 patients who did not receive rehabilitation. Patients undergoing rehabilitation had similar 1-year mortality rates to the matched comparison population (27% vs. 25%, p=0.45), but higher hospitalization rates and length-of-stay. Six percent of patients in both groups were admitted to a long-term care facility within the 1-year follow-up (P=0.65).\r\n\r\nLIMITATIONS\r\nPotential for residual confounding due to the use of administrative data.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nThese data suggest that patients may benefit physically from rehabilitation around the time of starting dialysis. Hospitalization was slightly higher in those undergoing rehab, however unlike previously published data on those with low baseline functional status, mortality was similar across both groups.","PeriodicalId":7419,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Kidney Diseases","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Kidney Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2025.06.003","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE Multiple studies have shown that older adults' initiation of dialysis is associated with functional decline often within months of starting treatment. This functional impairment has been associated with a 2- to 4-fold higher risk of mortality and morbidity. This study sought to assess if rehabilitation within the first few months after starting dialysis may improve physical function and reduce the rates of hospitalization and mortality. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective matched cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS Individuals in Ontario, Canada, aged ≥66 years initiating maintenance dialysis whose healthcare data were recorded by ICES, which captures administrative health data for the population of Ontario. EXPOSURE Inpatient rehabilitation care within 6 months of starting dialysis. OUTCOMES Change in the Functional Independence Measure (FIM®) score during the rehabilitation hospitalization among those receiving rehabilitation. Counts of hospital days, rates of admission to hospitals and long-term care facilities, and mortality over one year following the index date for comparisons of those who received rehabilitation to those who did not. ANALYTICAL APPROACH Patients receiving rehabilitation and three times as many not receiving rehabilitation were matched using a propensity score logistic regression model. Outcomes among those who did and did not receive rehabilitation were compared using Cox proportional hazards models and the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test for binary outcomes. RESULTS Among those undergoing rehabilitation, FIM® scores improved from 76±17 at admission, to 98±19 by discharge (p<0.0001). 1287 of 1567 (82%) patients admitted for rehabilitation within 6 months of dialysis were matched to 3861 patients who did not receive rehabilitation. Patients undergoing rehabilitation had similar 1-year mortality rates to the matched comparison population (27% vs. 25%, p=0.45), but higher hospitalization rates and length-of-stay. Six percent of patients in both groups were admitted to a long-term care facility within the 1-year follow-up (P=0.65). LIMITATIONS Potential for residual confounding due to the use of administrative data. CONCLUSIONS These data suggest that patients may benefit physically from rehabilitation around the time of starting dialysis. Hospitalization was slightly higher in those undergoing rehab, however unlike previously published data on those with low baseline functional status, mortality was similar across both groups.
老年人透析开始后不久住院康复对改善健康结果的有效性
理由与目的多项研究表明,老年人开始透析与功能下降有关,通常在开始治疗的几个月内。这种功能障碍与死亡率和发病率高2- 4倍有关。本研究旨在评估开始透析后最初几个月内的康复是否可以改善身体功能并降低住院率和死亡率。研究设计:回顾性匹配队列研究。背景和参与者:加拿大安大略省年龄≥66岁的开始维持性透析的个体,其健康数据由ICES记录,ICES收集安大略省人口的行政健康数据。患者开始透析后6个月内的康复护理。结果:接受康复治疗的患者在康复住院期间功能独立测量(FIM®)评分的变化。住院天数、住院率和长期护理机构入院率,以及在指标日期之后一年内接受康复治疗者与未接受康复治疗者的死亡率。分析方法采用倾向评分逻辑回归模型对接受康复治疗的患者和三倍于接受康复治疗的患者进行匹配。采用Cox比例风险模型和Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel二元结果检验比较接受和未接受康复治疗的患者的结果。结果在接受康复治疗的患者中,FIM®评分从入院时的76±17分提高到出院时的98±19分(p<0.0001)。1567例(82%)透析6个月内入院康复的患者中有1287例与3861例未接受康复的患者相匹配。接受康复治疗的患者1年死亡率与对照组相似(27%对25%,p=0.45),但住院率和住院时间更高。两组均有6%的患者在1年随访期间入住长期护理机构(P=0.65)。局限性:由于使用行政数据,可能存在残留混淆。结论:这些数据表明,患者在开始透析前后可能从康复中获益。接受康复治疗的患者住院率略高,但与先前公布的基线功能状态较低的患者的数据不同,两组的死亡率相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Kidney Diseases
American Journal of Kidney Diseases 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
2.30%
发文量
732
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Kidney Diseases (AJKD), the National Kidney Foundation's official journal, is globally recognized for its leadership in clinical nephrology content. Monthly, AJKD publishes original investigations on kidney diseases, hypertension, dialysis therapies, and kidney transplantation. Rigorous peer-review, statistical scrutiny, and a structured format characterize the publication process. Each issue includes case reports unveiling new diseases and potential therapeutic strategies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信