{"title":"Closing the Gap Between Modeling to Make Sense and Modeling to Implement Systems","authors":"Marc Linster","doi":"10.1002/j.1098-111x.1993.tb00004.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We view knowledge acquisition for knowledge‐based systems as a constructive model‐building process. From this view we derive several requirements for knowledge modeling environments. We concentrate on those requirements that arise if one wants to support both <jats:italic>modeling to make sense</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>modeling to implement systems</jats:italic> with a single language. For example, among other things, such languages should support multifaceted, bottom‐up construing of observed behavior and they should have operational semantics. We introduce the operational modeling language OMOS, an experimental study that—in a KADS‐like fashion—allows multifaceted model building from a method and a domain point of view, but, unlike KADS conceptual models, results in directly operational systems. Finally, we compare OMOS to other recent developments to highlight differences in the approaches.","PeriodicalId":14089,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Intelligent Systems","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Intelligent Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1098-111x.1993.tb00004.x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We view knowledge acquisition for knowledge‐based systems as a constructive model‐building process. From this view we derive several requirements for knowledge modeling environments. We concentrate on those requirements that arise if one wants to support both modeling to make sense and modeling to implement systems with a single language. For example, among other things, such languages should support multifaceted, bottom‐up construing of observed behavior and they should have operational semantics. We introduce the operational modeling language OMOS, an experimental study that—in a KADS‐like fashion—allows multifaceted model building from a method and a domain point of view, but, unlike KADS conceptual models, results in directly operational systems. Finally, we compare OMOS to other recent developments to highlight differences in the approaches.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Intelligent Systems serves as a forum for individuals interested in tapping into the vast theories based on intelligent systems construction. With its peer-reviewed format, the journal explores several fascinating editorials written by today''s experts in the field. Because new developments are being introduced each day, there''s much to be learned — examination, analysis creation, information retrieval, man–computer interactions, and more. The International Journal of Intelligent Systems uses charts and illustrations to demonstrate these ground-breaking issues, and encourages readers to share their thoughts and experiences.