Comparative Analysis of Sharpening Devices on Periodontal Hand Instruments and Their Impact on Root Surface Roughness: An In Vitro Study.

Natalie Yam, Jr Paul A Levi, Chia-Yu Jennifer Chen, Shayan Barootchi, Nicholas S Colella
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Sharpening Devices on Periodontal Hand Instruments and Their Impact on Root Surface Roughness: An In Vitro Study.","authors":"Natalie Yam, Jr Paul A Levi, Chia-Yu Jennifer Chen, Shayan Barootchi, Nicholas S Colella","doi":"10.11607/prd.7621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Maintaining sharp periodontal instruments is critical for effective scaling and root planing, yet little data exist on how different sharpening methods affect instrument and root surface roughness. This in-vitro study examined the effects of various manual sharpening diamond- coated cards (medium, fine, extra-fine) and synthetic stones (medium India, fine ceramic) on the roughness of Gracey 11/12 curette edges and instrumented root surfaces. All instruments were sharpened by a single operator using a standardized stationary instrument, moving stone (SIMS) technique. Root planing was then performed on mounted extracted teeth. Using optical profilometry, surface roughness was quantified. Results showed that fine grit abrasives produced smoother cutting edges and root surfaces compared to coarse grit abrasives (p < 0.05). Curettes sharpened with the extra-fine diamond card yielded the lowest roughness on both the instrument edge and the root surface. The orientation of the sharpening card influenced outcomes with a vertical orientation resulting in a significantly smoother edge than a horizontal orientation. Sequential sharpening, using fine then extra fine cards, further reduced edge and root roughness compared with using only a single fine grit. These findings highlight the importance of using extra-fine grit sharpening tools and proper sharpening technique to produce a smooth root surface.</p>","PeriodicalId":94231,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry","volume":"0 0","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.7621","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Maintaining sharp periodontal instruments is critical for effective scaling and root planing, yet little data exist on how different sharpening methods affect instrument and root surface roughness. This in-vitro study examined the effects of various manual sharpening diamond- coated cards (medium, fine, extra-fine) and synthetic stones (medium India, fine ceramic) on the roughness of Gracey 11/12 curette edges and instrumented root surfaces. All instruments were sharpened by a single operator using a standardized stationary instrument, moving stone (SIMS) technique. Root planing was then performed on mounted extracted teeth. Using optical profilometry, surface roughness was quantified. Results showed that fine grit abrasives produced smoother cutting edges and root surfaces compared to coarse grit abrasives (p < 0.05). Curettes sharpened with the extra-fine diamond card yielded the lowest roughness on both the instrument edge and the root surface. The orientation of the sharpening card influenced outcomes with a vertical orientation resulting in a significantly smoother edge than a horizontal orientation. Sequential sharpening, using fine then extra fine cards, further reduced edge and root roughness compared with using only a single fine grit. These findings highlight the importance of using extra-fine grit sharpening tools and proper sharpening technique to produce a smooth root surface.

牙周手工器械磨具的比较分析及其对牙根表面粗糙度影响的体外研究。
保持锋利的牙周工具对于有效的刮治和牙根刨平至关重要,然而关于不同的磨砺方法如何影响工具和牙根表面粗糙度的数据很少。这项体外研究检查了各种手工磨磨金刚石涂层卡(中等,精细,超精细)和合成石(中等印度,精细陶瓷)对Gracey 11/12刮刀边缘和仪器根表面粗糙度的影响。所有的仪器都是由一个操作员使用标准化的固定仪器,移动石头(SIMS)技术锐化的。然后对固定的拔牙进行牙根刨平。利用光学轮廓术,对表面粗糙度进行了量化。结果表明,细粒磨料比粗粒磨料的刃口和根表面更光滑(p < 0.05)。用超细金刚石卡磨尖的刮刀在仪器边缘和根部表面的粗糙度最低。锐化卡的方向影响了垂直方向的结果,导致比水平方向更光滑的边缘。顺序锐化,使用细和超细卡,进一步降低边缘和根部的粗糙度相比,只使用一个细粒度。这些发现强调了使用超细粒度锐化工具和适当的锐化技术来产生光滑根表面的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信