Phase-Synchronized Brain Connectivity During Emotion Regulation: Attachment as a Moderator.

Marcos Domic-Siede, Mónica Guzmán-González, Romina Ortiz, Sara Hernández, Catalina Carvallo
{"title":"Phase-Synchronized Brain Connectivity During Emotion Regulation: Attachment as a Moderator.","authors":"Marcos Domic-Siede, Mónica Guzmán-González, Romina Ortiz, Sara Hernández, Catalina Carvallo","doi":"10.1093/scan/nsaf069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Emotion regulation is essential for modulating emotional experiences. According to studies in attachment, individual differences in attachment anxiety and avoidance may lead to difficulties in the strategies used to regulate emotions. These dispositions may shape the neural mechanisms underlying regulation. This study examined oscillatory brain connectivity during two strategies-cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression-across delta (1-3 Hz), theta (4-8 Hz), alpha (9-12 Hz), and beta (15-30 Hz) bands. We also tested whether attachment orientations modulate these connectivity patterns. Sixty adults completed an emotion regulation task while EEG was recorded. Connectivity was estimated using the debiased weighted Phase Lag Index (wPLI). Linear mixed-effects models assessed the effects of condition, attachment, and their interaction on connectivity between frontal or central electrodes and the rest of the scalp. Reappraisal increased theta-band connectivity between frontal and distributed sites, while suppression enhanced beta connectivity involving frontal and central electrodes. Higher attachment anxiety was associated with reduced theta connectivity during reappraisal, and higher avoidance predicted increased beta connectivity during suppression. These findings suggest that emotion regulation strategies engage distinct oscillatory networks, modulated by interpersonal dispositions. Theta connectivity may reflect top-down control processes in reappraisal, while beta connectivity may support inhibition during suppression.</p>","PeriodicalId":94208,"journal":{"name":"Social cognitive and affective neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social cognitive and affective neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaf069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Emotion regulation is essential for modulating emotional experiences. According to studies in attachment, individual differences in attachment anxiety and avoidance may lead to difficulties in the strategies used to regulate emotions. These dispositions may shape the neural mechanisms underlying regulation. This study examined oscillatory brain connectivity during two strategies-cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression-across delta (1-3 Hz), theta (4-8 Hz), alpha (9-12 Hz), and beta (15-30 Hz) bands. We also tested whether attachment orientations modulate these connectivity patterns. Sixty adults completed an emotion regulation task while EEG was recorded. Connectivity was estimated using the debiased weighted Phase Lag Index (wPLI). Linear mixed-effects models assessed the effects of condition, attachment, and their interaction on connectivity between frontal or central electrodes and the rest of the scalp. Reappraisal increased theta-band connectivity between frontal and distributed sites, while suppression enhanced beta connectivity involving frontal and central electrodes. Higher attachment anxiety was associated with reduced theta connectivity during reappraisal, and higher avoidance predicted increased beta connectivity during suppression. These findings suggest that emotion regulation strategies engage distinct oscillatory networks, modulated by interpersonal dispositions. Theta connectivity may reflect top-down control processes in reappraisal, while beta connectivity may support inhibition during suppression.

情绪调节过程中的相同步脑连接:依恋作为调节因子。
情绪调节对于调节情绪体验至关重要。根据依恋研究,个体在依恋焦虑和依恋回避方面的差异可能导致情绪调节策略的困难。这些倾向可能塑造了潜在调节的神经机制。这项研究考察了在delta (1-3 Hz)、theta (4-8 Hz)、alpha (9-12 Hz)和beta (15-30 Hz)波段上的两种策略——认知重新评估和表达抑制——的振荡大脑连通性。我们还测试了依恋取向是否会调节这些连接模式。60名成年人完成了情绪调节任务,同时记录了脑电图。使用去偏加权相位滞后指数(wPLI)估计连通性。线性混合效应模型评估了条件、依恋及其相互作用对前额电极或中央电极与头皮其余部分之间连通性的影响。重新评估增加了额叶和分布电极之间的β带连接,而抑制则增强了额叶和中央电极之间的β带连接。较高的依恋焦虑与重评价期间θ连接减少有关,而较高的回避预示着压抑期间β连接增加。这些发现表明情绪调节策略涉及不同的振荡网络,由人际倾向调节。Theta连接可能反映了重评价过程中自上而下的控制过程,而β连接可能支持抑制过程中的抑制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信