Definitive radiotherapy for unresectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: is it time for an update?

Radiation oncology journal Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-25 DOI:10.3857/roj.2024.00437
Pervin Hurmuz, Alper Kahvecioglu, Gokhan Ozyigit, Omer Dizdar, Mustafa Cengiz
{"title":"Definitive radiotherapy for unresectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: is it time for an update?","authors":"Pervin Hurmuz, Alper Kahvecioglu, Gokhan Ozyigit, Omer Dizdar, Mustafa Cengiz","doi":"10.3857/roj.2024.00437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>For patients with unresectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, radiotherapy (RT) is the definitive treatment. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the role of two different RT techniques for definitive treatment of unresectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Eighteen patients with unresectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma treated with either conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) were evaluated retrospectively. Patients treated with CFRT also received elective nodal irradiation (ENI) in addition to the primary tumor.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median doses of CFRT and SBRT were 50.4 Gy (range, 45 to 59.4) in 25-33 fractions and 37.5 Gy (range, 27.5 to 50) in 3-5 fractions, respectively. Median follow-up was 22 months (range, 7 to 138). During follow-up, local failure occured in one patient (12.5%) in the SBRT group and six patients (60.0%) in the CFRT group (p = 0.041). On the other hand, regional failure occured in five patients (62.5%) in the SBRT group and in two patients (20.0%) in the CFRT group (p = 0.047). Two-year overall survival (OS), local-regional failure-free survival (LRFFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rates were 35%, 30%, and 24%, respectively. Younger age (≤55 years) was associated with better OS, LRFFS, and DMFS. None of the patients experienced ≥grade 3 acute or late toxicity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While SBRT may provide better local tumor control compared to CFRT, the absence of ENI can result in increased regional recurrences. Hence, conducting prospective studies to examine the safety and efficacy of integrating hypofractionated ENI into SBRT is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":94184,"journal":{"name":"Radiation oncology journal","volume":"43 2","pages":"57-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12215330/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation oncology journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3857/roj.2024.00437","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: For patients with unresectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, radiotherapy (RT) is the definitive treatment. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the role of two different RT techniques for definitive treatment of unresectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Materials and methods: Eighteen patients with unresectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma treated with either conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) were evaluated retrospectively. Patients treated with CFRT also received elective nodal irradiation (ENI) in addition to the primary tumor.

Results: Median doses of CFRT and SBRT were 50.4 Gy (range, 45 to 59.4) in 25-33 fractions and 37.5 Gy (range, 27.5 to 50) in 3-5 fractions, respectively. Median follow-up was 22 months (range, 7 to 138). During follow-up, local failure occured in one patient (12.5%) in the SBRT group and six patients (60.0%) in the CFRT group (p = 0.041). On the other hand, regional failure occured in five patients (62.5%) in the SBRT group and in two patients (20.0%) in the CFRT group (p = 0.047). Two-year overall survival (OS), local-regional failure-free survival (LRFFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rates were 35%, 30%, and 24%, respectively. Younger age (≤55 years) was associated with better OS, LRFFS, and DMFS. None of the patients experienced ≥grade 3 acute or late toxicity.

Conclusion: While SBRT may provide better local tumor control compared to CFRT, the absence of ENI can result in increased regional recurrences. Hence, conducting prospective studies to examine the safety and efficacy of integrating hypofractionated ENI into SBRT is warranted.

不可切除肝外胆管癌的最终放疗:是更新的时候了吗?
目的:对于不能切除的肝外胆管癌患者,放疗是最终的治疗方法。在这项研究中,我们旨在评估两种不同的RT技术在不可切除的肝外胆管癌的最终治疗中的作用。材料和方法:回顾性分析18例不可切除肝外胆管癌患者接受常规分割放疗(CFRT)或立体定向放疗(SBRT)治疗的临床资料。除原发肿瘤外,接受CFRT治疗的患者还接受选择性淋巴结照射(ENI)。结果:CFRT和SBRT的中位剂量在25-33个馏分中分别为50.4 Gy(范围,45至59.4)和37.5 Gy(范围,27.5至50)。中位随访时间为22个月(范围7 - 138个月)。随访期间,SBRT组出现1例(12.5%)局部失败,CFRT组出现6例(60.0%)局部失败(p = 0.041)。另一方面,SBRT组中有5例患者(62.5%)发生了局部衰竭,CFRT组中有2例患者(20.0%)发生了局部衰竭(p = 0.047)。两年总生存率(OS)、局部-区域无衰竭生存率(LRFFS)和远处无转移生存率(DMFS)分别为35%、30%和24%。年龄越小(≤55岁)患者的OS、LRFFS和DMFS越好。没有患者出现≥3级急性或晚期毒性。结论:虽然与CFRT相比,SBRT可能提供更好的局部肿瘤控制,但缺乏ENI可能导致局部复发增加。因此,有必要进行前瞻性研究,以检查将切开的ENI整合到SBRT中的安全性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信