Catheter-Vessel Interactions During Aspiration Thrombectomy: A Comprehensive Analysis Using a Novel Swine Model.

Timothy K Shimizu, Ichiro Yuki, Hemdeep Kaur, Zachary W Hsu, Earl Steward, Tracy Nguyen, Shuichi Suzuki
{"title":"Catheter-Vessel Interactions During Aspiration Thrombectomy: A Comprehensive Analysis Using a Novel Swine Model.","authors":"Timothy K Shimizu, Ichiro Yuki, Hemdeep Kaur, Zachary W Hsu, Earl Steward, Tracy Nguyen, Shuichi Suzuki","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A8898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Catheter-vessel interactions during aspiration thrombectomy may vary depending on vessel size, potentially affecting reperfusion outcomes. This study aimed to assess how vessel diameter influences procedural dynamics and reperfusion success rates using a swine model with real-time, direct vessel visualization.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An animal model utilizing Yorkshire swine was used to evaluate catheter-vessel interactions during aspiration thrombectomy. The common carotid artery (CCA, 4-6 mm) and superficial cervical artery (SCA, 2-3 mm) represented large and small vessels, respectively. Each vessel was surgically exposed, occluded using clot analogs, and monitored using a high-resolution digital microscope camera. Aspiration thrombectomy was performed starting with remote aspiration, followed by contact aspiration. Vessel behavior, including collapse and traction, was evaluated in relation to vessel size and reperfusion success.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 33 thrombectomy procedures were performed on 14 vessels in 4 swine. In the CCA group (mean diameter: 5.14 mm), remote aspiration achieved 85.7% reperfusion success without vessel collapse, leading to 100% final reperfusion. In the SCA group (mean diameter: 2.27 mm), all remote aspiration attempts caused immediate vessel collapse with no successful reperfusion (0%), requiring contact aspiration, which resulted in 71.4% final reperfusion. Vessel collapse was significantly more frequent in SCA vs. CCA (p < 0.001). Two distinct patterns of vessel traction were observed exclusively in the SCA group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Vessel size strongly influences aspiration thrombectomy efficacy. Smaller vessels are more susceptible to vessel collapse and catheter-induced traction during aspiration thrombectomy, reducing the success rate of reperfusion and increasing reliance on true contact aspiration.</p><p><strong>Abbreviations: </strong>CCA= common carotid artery; SCA= superficial cervical artery; LVO= large-vessel occlusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":93863,"journal":{"name":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8898","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Catheter-vessel interactions during aspiration thrombectomy may vary depending on vessel size, potentially affecting reperfusion outcomes. This study aimed to assess how vessel diameter influences procedural dynamics and reperfusion success rates using a swine model with real-time, direct vessel visualization.

Materials and methods: An animal model utilizing Yorkshire swine was used to evaluate catheter-vessel interactions during aspiration thrombectomy. The common carotid artery (CCA, 4-6 mm) and superficial cervical artery (SCA, 2-3 mm) represented large and small vessels, respectively. Each vessel was surgically exposed, occluded using clot analogs, and monitored using a high-resolution digital microscope camera. Aspiration thrombectomy was performed starting with remote aspiration, followed by contact aspiration. Vessel behavior, including collapse and traction, was evaluated in relation to vessel size and reperfusion success.

Results: A total of 33 thrombectomy procedures were performed on 14 vessels in 4 swine. In the CCA group (mean diameter: 5.14 mm), remote aspiration achieved 85.7% reperfusion success without vessel collapse, leading to 100% final reperfusion. In the SCA group (mean diameter: 2.27 mm), all remote aspiration attempts caused immediate vessel collapse with no successful reperfusion (0%), requiring contact aspiration, which resulted in 71.4% final reperfusion. Vessel collapse was significantly more frequent in SCA vs. CCA (p < 0.001). Two distinct patterns of vessel traction were observed exclusively in the SCA group.

Conclusions: Vessel size strongly influences aspiration thrombectomy efficacy. Smaller vessels are more susceptible to vessel collapse and catheter-induced traction during aspiration thrombectomy, reducing the success rate of reperfusion and increasing reliance on true contact aspiration.

Abbreviations: CCA= common carotid artery; SCA= superficial cervical artery; LVO= large-vessel occlusion.

抽吸取栓过程中导管-血管相互作用:一种新型猪模型的综合分析。
背景和目的:吸入性取栓过程中导管与血管的相互作用可能因血管大小而异,可能影响再灌注结果。本研究旨在利用实时、直接血管可视化的猪模型,评估血管直径如何影响程序动力学和再灌注成功率。材料和方法:采用约克郡猪动物模型评价吸入性取栓过程中导管与血管的相互作用。颈总动脉(CCA, 4-6 mm)和颈浅动脉(SCA, 2-3 mm)分别代表大血管和小血管。每条血管手术暴露,用血栓类似物闭塞,并使用高分辨率数码显微镜相机监测。从远程抽吸开始进行吸入性取栓,随后进行接触抽吸。血管行为,包括塌陷和牵拉,评估与血管大小和再灌注成功的关系。结果:4头猪共对14条血管进行了33次取栓手术。CCA组(平均直径5.14 mm)远程抽吸再灌注成功率85.7%,无血管塌陷,最终再灌注100%。在SCA组(平均直径2.27 mm)中,所有远程抽吸尝试均导致血管立即塌陷,未成功再灌注(0%),需要接触抽吸,导致71.4%的最终再灌注。血管塌陷在SCA组比CCA组更常见(p < 0.001)。在SCA组中观察到两种不同的血管牵引模式。结论:血管大小对抽吸取栓效果影响较大。在吸入性取栓过程中,较小的血管更容易发生血管塌陷和导管牵引,降低了再灌注的成功率,增加了对真正接触性抽吸的依赖。缩写:CCA=颈总动脉;颈浅动脉;LVO=大血管闭塞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信