7 Tesla Time-of-Flight MRA in Adolescents.

Sergio Valencia, Fedel Machado-Rivas, Maria Camila Cortes-Albornoz, Samuel Cd Cartmell, Harry Griffin, Darren B Orbach, Vanessa Rameh, Alfred Pokmeng See, Simon K Warfield, Onur Afacan, Camilo Jaimes
{"title":"7 Tesla Time-of-Flight MRA in Adolescents.","authors":"Sergio Valencia, Fedel Machado-Rivas, Maria Camila Cortes-Albornoz, Samuel Cd Cartmell, Harry Griffin, Darren B Orbach, Vanessa Rameh, Alfred Pokmeng See, Simon K Warfield, Onur Afacan, Camilo Jaimes","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A8908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>The increased signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at 7 Tesla (7T) enables higher spatial resolution for neurovascular imaging, yet its application in pediatric magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) remains underexplored. This study systematically evaluates the advantages of 7T time-of-flight (TOF) MRA compared to 3T in pediatric patients, hypothesizing that 7T would provide superior vessel contrast and increased vascular volume, given the use of smaller voxels, as well as higher SNR, despite these smaller voxels.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This HIPAA-compliant, IRB-approved retrospective study included pediatric patients (<19 years) who underwent 7T TOF MRA. Controls consisted of either same-subject 3T MRAs within 6 months (when available) or age-and sex-matched 3T MRA subjects. Imaging parameters were optimized for spatial resolution at 7T to achieve 0.3-0.4 mm isotropic voxels. Quantitative analysis included contrast ratio (CR) and SNR measurements for the ICA, M1 to M4 arterial segments, and lenticulostriate perforating arteries. Vascular volume was assessed using 3D segmentation. Semiquantitative vessel conspicuity ratings and motion artifact scoring were performed by blinded neuroradiologists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen patients (10 with 7T MRA, 5 with matched 3T controls) and 20 MRAs were analyzed. CR was significantly higher at 7T for perforators, M3, and M4 branches (P < 0.05), with the greatest improvement in M4 branches. Vascular volume was 147% greater at 7T (P = 0.018), reflecting improved small vessel depiction and segmentation. Semiquantitative analysis showed significantly better vessel conspicuity at 7T for M4 branches and lenticulostriate perforators (P < 0.01). Motion artifact scores were similar between field strengths (P = 0.118).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>7T TOF MRA significantly enhances vascular contrast and improves visualization of small arteries compared to 3T, making it a valuable tool for pediatric cerebrovascular imaging.</p><p><strong>Abbreviations: </strong>CR= Contrast Ratio; LSA= Lenticulostriate Perforating Arteries.</p>","PeriodicalId":93863,"journal":{"name":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8908","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: The increased signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at 7 Tesla (7T) enables higher spatial resolution for neurovascular imaging, yet its application in pediatric magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) remains underexplored. This study systematically evaluates the advantages of 7T time-of-flight (TOF) MRA compared to 3T in pediatric patients, hypothesizing that 7T would provide superior vessel contrast and increased vascular volume, given the use of smaller voxels, as well as higher SNR, despite these smaller voxels.

Materials and methods: This HIPAA-compliant, IRB-approved retrospective study included pediatric patients (<19 years) who underwent 7T TOF MRA. Controls consisted of either same-subject 3T MRAs within 6 months (when available) or age-and sex-matched 3T MRA subjects. Imaging parameters were optimized for spatial resolution at 7T to achieve 0.3-0.4 mm isotropic voxels. Quantitative analysis included contrast ratio (CR) and SNR measurements for the ICA, M1 to M4 arterial segments, and lenticulostriate perforating arteries. Vascular volume was assessed using 3D segmentation. Semiquantitative vessel conspicuity ratings and motion artifact scoring were performed by blinded neuroradiologists.

Results: Fifteen patients (10 with 7T MRA, 5 with matched 3T controls) and 20 MRAs were analyzed. CR was significantly higher at 7T for perforators, M3, and M4 branches (P < 0.05), with the greatest improvement in M4 branches. Vascular volume was 147% greater at 7T (P = 0.018), reflecting improved small vessel depiction and segmentation. Semiquantitative analysis showed significantly better vessel conspicuity at 7T for M4 branches and lenticulostriate perforators (P < 0.01). Motion artifact scores were similar between field strengths (P = 0.118).

Conclusions: 7T TOF MRA significantly enhances vascular contrast and improves visualization of small arteries compared to 3T, making it a valuable tool for pediatric cerebrovascular imaging.

Abbreviations: CR= Contrast Ratio; LSA= Lenticulostriate Perforating Arteries.

青少年的特斯拉飞行时间MRA。
背景与目的:7特斯拉(7T)的信噪比(SNR)提高了神经血管成像的空间分辨率,但其在儿童磁共振血管造影(MRA)中的应用仍有待探索。本研究系统地评估了7T飞行时间(TOF) MRA与3T相比在儿科患者中的优势,假设7T可以提供更好的血管对比度和更大的血管体积,使用更小的体素,以及更高的信噪比,尽管这些体素更小。材料和方法:这项符合hipaa标准、经irb批准的回顾性研究纳入了儿童患者(结果:15例患者(10例7T MRA, 5例匹配3T对照)和20例MRA进行了分析。7T时,穿支、M3和M4支的CR均显著升高(P < 0.05),其中M4支改善最大。7T时血管体积增加147% (P = 0.018),反映了小血管描绘和分割的改善。半定量分析显示,7T时M4支和透镜状纹孔穿支的血管显著性显著提高(P < 0.01)。不同场强的运动伪影评分相似(P = 0.118)。结论:与3T相比,7T TOF MRA可显著增强血管对比,改善小动脉的显示,是一种有价值的儿童脑血管成像工具。缩写:CR=对比度;荚状纹状动脉穿通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信