Locally advanced prostate cancer treated with neoadjuvant therapy combined with surgery: a multicenter retrospective cohort analysis.

Shu-Jun Liu, Shao-Hao Chen, Jian-Hao Wu, Zhi-Gang Wu, Yun Jin, Xue-Feng Qiu, Shun Zhang, Lin-Feng Xu, Di Gu, Wei Chen, Xu-Yu Zhang, Yu-Wen Wang, Ning Xu, Hong-Qian Guo, Jun-Long Zhuang
{"title":"Locally advanced prostate cancer treated with neoadjuvant therapy combined with surgery: a multicenter retrospective cohort analysis.","authors":"Shu-Jun Liu, Shao-Hao Chen, Jian-Hao Wu, Zhi-Gang Wu, Yun Jin, Xue-Feng Qiu, Shun Zhang, Lin-Feng Xu, Di Gu, Wei Chen, Xu-Yu Zhang, Yu-Wen Wang, Ning Xu, Hong-Qian Guo, Jun-Long Zhuang","doi":"10.4103/aja202530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent data from clinical trials have shown that neoadjuvant therapies significantly improve the pathological outcomes of prostate cancer patients. This study aimed to assess the specific pathological and prognostic effects of these therapies in a real-world, multicenter cohort. Additionally, we explored how factors such as the duration of neoadjuvant therapy and pretreatment imaging modality impact overall treatment outcomes within this therapeutic framework. Data were collected from 407 patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (LAPC) who underwent radical prostatectomy following neoadjuvant therapy. Kaplan‒Meier estimates were used to evaluate the four primary clinical endpoints. The log-rank test was used to assess whether significant differences existed between patients grouped according to neoadjuvant therapy duration and pretreatment imaging modality. After a median follow-up period of 36 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) for the entire cohort was 19 months. An analysis of different durations of neoadjuvant therapy revealed that compared with a 3-month regimen, a 6-month regimen was significantly associated with a greater extent of pathological downstaging and more favorable values for drug response indicators (Pearson test, P = 0.018). Additionally, the 6-month regimen significantly improved the clinical endpoints of PFS (log-rank test, P = 0.0075) and metastasis-free survival (MFS; log-rank test, P = 0.0069). Kaplan‒Meier analysis of patients grouped according to preoperative imaging modality revealed that the use of 68Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen-directed positron emission tomography/computed tomography (68Ga-PSMA PET/CT) before treatment, as opposed to traditional imaging, led to significant improvements in the clinical endpoints of PFS (log-rank test, P = 0.0059) and radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS; log-rank test, P = 0.016).</p>","PeriodicalId":93889,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of andrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of andrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aja202530","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent data from clinical trials have shown that neoadjuvant therapies significantly improve the pathological outcomes of prostate cancer patients. This study aimed to assess the specific pathological and prognostic effects of these therapies in a real-world, multicenter cohort. Additionally, we explored how factors such as the duration of neoadjuvant therapy and pretreatment imaging modality impact overall treatment outcomes within this therapeutic framework. Data were collected from 407 patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (LAPC) who underwent radical prostatectomy following neoadjuvant therapy. Kaplan‒Meier estimates were used to evaluate the four primary clinical endpoints. The log-rank test was used to assess whether significant differences existed between patients grouped according to neoadjuvant therapy duration and pretreatment imaging modality. After a median follow-up period of 36 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) for the entire cohort was 19 months. An analysis of different durations of neoadjuvant therapy revealed that compared with a 3-month regimen, a 6-month regimen was significantly associated with a greater extent of pathological downstaging and more favorable values for drug response indicators (Pearson test, P = 0.018). Additionally, the 6-month regimen significantly improved the clinical endpoints of PFS (log-rank test, P = 0.0075) and metastasis-free survival (MFS; log-rank test, P = 0.0069). Kaplan‒Meier analysis of patients grouped according to preoperative imaging modality revealed that the use of 68Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen-directed positron emission tomography/computed tomography (68Ga-PSMA PET/CT) before treatment, as opposed to traditional imaging, led to significant improvements in the clinical endpoints of PFS (log-rank test, P = 0.0059) and radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS; log-rank test, P = 0.016).

新辅助治疗联合手术治疗局部晚期前列腺癌:多中心回顾性队列分析。
最近的临床试验数据表明,新辅助治疗可显著改善前列腺癌患者的病理预后。本研究旨在评估这些疗法在真实世界多中心队列中的具体病理和预后效果。此外,我们探讨了新辅助治疗的持续时间和预处理成像方式等因素如何影响该治疗框架内的整体治疗结果。数据收集自407例局部晚期前列腺癌(LAPC)患者,他们在新辅助治疗后接受根治性前列腺切除术。Kaplan-Meier估计用于评估4个主要临床终点。采用log-rank检验评估根据新辅助治疗时间和预处理成像方式分组的患者之间是否存在显著差异。中位随访期36个月后,整个队列的中位无进展生存期(PFS)为19个月。对不同新辅助治疗持续时间的分析显示,与3个月的方案相比,6个月的方案与更大程度的病理降分期和更有利的药物反应指标值显著相关(Pearson检验,P = 0.018)。此外,6个月的方案显著改善了PFS的临床终点(log-rank检验,P = 0.0075)和无转移生存期(MFS;log-rank检验,P = 0.0069)。根据术前成像方式分组的患者Kaplan-Meier分析显示,与传统成像相比,治疗前使用68ga标记的前列腺特异性膜抗原定向正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(68Ga-PSMA PET/CT)可显著改善PFS的临床终点(log-rank检验,P = 0.0059)和放射学无进展生存期(rPFS;log-rank检验,P = 0.016)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信