The use of intraoperative tractography in brain tumor and epilepsy surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Frontiers in neuroimaging Pub Date : 2025-06-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnimg.2025.1563996
Holly Aylmore, Fiona Young, Kristian Aquilina, Chris A Clark, Jonathan D Clayden
{"title":"The use of intraoperative tractography in brain tumor and epilepsy surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Holly Aylmore, Fiona Young, Kristian Aquilina, Chris A Clark, Jonathan D Clayden","doi":"10.3389/fnimg.2025.1563996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Tractography is the only available technique for visualizing whitematter pathways within the living brain. Avoiding these pathways during surgical interventions for brain tumors and epilepsy is key to reducing postoperative neurological deficits whilst achieving maximum safe resection. Despite this, the use of intraoperative tractography is not widely adopted in clinical practice, with time required to run analyses often cited as a limitation. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the impact of intraoperative tractography on neurosurgical outcomes in both tumor and epilepsy surgeries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, five major databases were searched using neurosurgery, tractography, brain tumor, and epilepsy terms. Original primary research studies in English were included. A risk of bias analysis was conducted using the MINORS tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search strategy identified 2,611 papers. Following de-duplication and screening, 26 papers were included in the final analysis. Risk of bias was found to be moderate. Findings suggest that the use of intraoperative tractography has the potential to improve surgical outcomes for patients undergoing tumor and epilepsy surgery. Meta-analysis indicated a good rate of gross total resection, 79%, and only three studies of brain tumors and one study of epilepsy reported worsening of neurological deficits.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Though the evidence supporting its use remains limited, results indicate that intraoperative tractography can be a valuable tool in improving neurosurgical outcomes and reducing the risk of postoperative deficits. Further research is required to determine optimal use in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42023427427, Identifier: CRD42023427427.</p>","PeriodicalId":73094,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in neuroimaging","volume":"4 ","pages":"1563996"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12209374/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in neuroimaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnimg.2025.1563996","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Tractography is the only available technique for visualizing whitematter pathways within the living brain. Avoiding these pathways during surgical interventions for brain tumors and epilepsy is key to reducing postoperative neurological deficits whilst achieving maximum safe resection. Despite this, the use of intraoperative tractography is not widely adopted in clinical practice, with time required to run analyses often cited as a limitation. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the impact of intraoperative tractography on neurosurgical outcomes in both tumor and epilepsy surgeries.

Methods: Conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, five major databases were searched using neurosurgery, tractography, brain tumor, and epilepsy terms. Original primary research studies in English were included. A risk of bias analysis was conducted using the MINORS tool.

Results: The search strategy identified 2,611 papers. Following de-duplication and screening, 26 papers were included in the final analysis. Risk of bias was found to be moderate. Findings suggest that the use of intraoperative tractography has the potential to improve surgical outcomes for patients undergoing tumor and epilepsy surgery. Meta-analysis indicated a good rate of gross total resection, 79%, and only three studies of brain tumors and one study of epilepsy reported worsening of neurological deficits.

Discussion: Though the evidence supporting its use remains limited, results indicate that intraoperative tractography can be a valuable tool in improving neurosurgical outcomes and reducing the risk of postoperative deficits. Further research is required to determine optimal use in clinical practice.

Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42023427427, Identifier: CRD42023427427.

术中导管造影在脑肿瘤和癫痫手术中的应用:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
简介:神经束造影是唯一可用的技术来可视化白质通路在活的大脑。在脑肿瘤和癫痫的手术干预中避免这些通路是减少术后神经功能缺损同时实现最大安全切除的关键。尽管如此,术中肛管造影在临床实践中并没有被广泛采用,运行分析通常需要时间作为限制。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估术中神经束造影对肿瘤和癫痫手术神经外科结果的影响。方法:按照PRISMA指南,检索神经外科、神经束造影、脑肿瘤和癫痫五个主要数据库。纳入了原始的英文研究报告。使用minor工具进行偏倚风险分析。结果:该搜索策略确定了2611篇论文。经过重复和筛选,最后分析了26篇论文。发现偏倚风险为中等。研究结果表明,术中使用导管造影有可能改善肿瘤和癫痫手术患者的手术结果。荟萃分析表明,总全切除率为79%,只有3项脑肿瘤研究和1项癫痫研究报告了神经功能缺损的恶化。讨论:尽管支持其使用的证据仍然有限,但结果表明术中束造影可以是改善神经外科结果和降低术后缺陷风险的有价值的工具。需要进一步的研究来确定临床实践的最佳使用。系统评价注册:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42023427427,标识符:CRD42023427427。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信