Treatment practices for geriatric type II odontoid fractures - A survey by the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies Spine Section.

IF 1.9 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Brain & spine Pub Date : 2025-06-14 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.bas.2025.104295
Ralph T Schär, Jefferson R Wilson, Marcel Ivanov, Giuseppe Barbagallo, Yana Petrova, Carla Reizinho, Maria Luisa Gandia González, Enrico Tessitore, Andrzej Maciejczak, Nikolay Gabrovsky, Bart Depreitre, Ehab Shiban, Andreas K Demetriades, Florian Ringel
{"title":"Treatment practices for geriatric type II odontoid fractures - A survey by the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies Spine Section.","authors":"Ralph T Schär, Jefferson R Wilson, Marcel Ivanov, Giuseppe Barbagallo, Yana Petrova, Carla Reizinho, Maria Luisa Gandia González, Enrico Tessitore, Andrzej Maciejczak, Nikolay Gabrovsky, Bart Depreitre, Ehab Shiban, Andreas K Demetriades, Florian Ringel","doi":"10.1016/j.bas.2025.104295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Controversy exists regarding the optimal management of type II odontoid fractures in the geriatric population. The objective of this study was to determine the current treatment patterns of spine surgeons for geriatric patients (≥70 years) with type II odontoid fractures.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>How much do treatment practices for type II odontoid fractures in the geriatric population differ amongst spine surgeons?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The European Association of Neurosurgical Societies (EANS) Spine Section distributed a 39-items web-based survey among spine surgeons between July 2024 and February 2025.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 154 responses were collected from 119 neurosurgeons (77.8 %) and 34 orthopedic surgeons (22.2 %). Participants were predominantly from Europe (92.7 %), and 63.2 % have been in practice >10 years. Fracture displacement, comorbidities and age were the most influential factors for decision-making. For non-displaced fractures, 78.8 % of respondents recommended conservative treatment for patients aged 70-80 years, and 83.7 % for those aged 80-90 years. For displaced fractures, 70.9 % preferred surgery for patients aged 70-80 years, whereas this preference decreased to 47.9 % for those aged 80-90 years. Posterior C1-2 fixation was the most common technique for 67.3 % of respondents, and 48.3 % prescribe a collar postoperatively. 51.3 % routinely order CT imaging postoperatively to assess for bony fusion. For conservative treatment, 59.3 % prescribe an external orthosis for 3 months.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>Our survey found both variability and consistency in treatment practices of geriatric type II odontoid fractures, reflecting the ongoing debate and lack of consensus in clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":72443,"journal":{"name":"Brain & spine","volume":"5 ","pages":"104295"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12210293/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain & spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bas.2025.104295","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Controversy exists regarding the optimal management of type II odontoid fractures in the geriatric population. The objective of this study was to determine the current treatment patterns of spine surgeons for geriatric patients (≥70 years) with type II odontoid fractures.

Research question: How much do treatment practices for type II odontoid fractures in the geriatric population differ amongst spine surgeons?

Methods: The European Association of Neurosurgical Societies (EANS) Spine Section distributed a 39-items web-based survey among spine surgeons between July 2024 and February 2025.

Results: A total of 154 responses were collected from 119 neurosurgeons (77.8 %) and 34 orthopedic surgeons (22.2 %). Participants were predominantly from Europe (92.7 %), and 63.2 % have been in practice >10 years. Fracture displacement, comorbidities and age were the most influential factors for decision-making. For non-displaced fractures, 78.8 % of respondents recommended conservative treatment for patients aged 70-80 years, and 83.7 % for those aged 80-90 years. For displaced fractures, 70.9 % preferred surgery for patients aged 70-80 years, whereas this preference decreased to 47.9 % for those aged 80-90 years. Posterior C1-2 fixation was the most common technique for 67.3 % of respondents, and 48.3 % prescribe a collar postoperatively. 51.3 % routinely order CT imaging postoperatively to assess for bony fusion. For conservative treatment, 59.3 % prescribe an external orthosis for 3 months.

Discussion and conclusion: Our survey found both variability and consistency in treatment practices of geriatric type II odontoid fractures, reflecting the ongoing debate and lack of consensus in clinical decision-making.

老年II型齿状突骨折的治疗实践-欧洲神经外科学会脊柱科协会的一项调查。
导言:关于老年人群II型齿状突骨折的最佳治疗存在争议。本研究的目的是确定脊柱外科医生目前对II型齿状突骨折的老年患者(≥70岁)的治疗模式。研究问题:脊柱外科医生对老年人群II型齿状突骨折的治疗方法有多大差异?方法:欧洲神经外科学会协会(EANS)脊柱科在2024年7月至2025年2月期间对脊柱外科医生进行了39项网络调查。结果:共收集神经外科医生119名(77.8%)和骨科医生34名(22.2%)的154份问卷。参与者主要来自欧洲(92.7%),其中63.2%的人从业10年以上。骨折移位、合并症和年龄是影响决策的主要因素。对于非移位性骨折,78.8%的受访者建议70-80岁的患者进行保守治疗,83.7%的受访者建议80-90岁的患者进行保守治疗。对于移位性骨折,70-80岁患者中有70.9%倾向于手术治疗,而80-90岁患者中这一比例降至47.9%。后路C1-2固定是67.3%的应答者最常用的技术,48.3%的应答者术后使用颈圈。51.3%的患者术后常规要求CT检查以评估骨融合情况。对于保守治疗,59.3%的患者使用外置矫形器3个月。讨论和结论:我们的调查发现,老年II型齿状突骨折的治疗实践既有可变性,也有一致性,反映了临床决策中持续的争论和缺乏共识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain & spine
Brain & spine Surgery
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
71 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信