Tracing Missing Surgical Specimens: A Quality Improvement Strategy for Adverse Events Based on Root Cause Analysis.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Pub Date : 2025-06-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S527015
Li-Li Huang, Ju-Hong Yang, Wei-Wen Hong, Bin-Liang Wang, Hai-Fei Chen
{"title":"Tracing Missing Surgical Specimens: A Quality Improvement Strategy for Adverse Events Based on Root Cause Analysis.","authors":"Li-Li Huang, Ju-Hong Yang, Wei-Wen Hong, Bin-Liang Wang, Hai-Fei Chen","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S527015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2022, a critical incident occurred at a Chinese hospital where a surgical specimen from a rectal prostate procedure was misplaced, necessitating repeat surgery for the patient. This event underscored systemic vulnerabilities in specimen handling processes and catalyzed an investigation into how healthcare systems manage medical errors to uphold patient safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using root cause analysis (RCA), we dissected the workflow gaps and organizational factors contributing to the specimen loss. Key failures identified included unclear role delineation among staff, inadequate specimen labeling protocols, and lack of real-time tracking mechanisms. Three interventions were implemented: (1) Redesigning specimen handling workflows with explicit role responsibilities; (2) Developing standardized, color-coded specimen bottles and racks to improve visual identification; (3) Integrating an electronic tracking system for closed-loop management of specimens.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Post-intervention, the recognition rate of post-use specimen vials improved from 0% to 100% after implementing a dual-color sealing system (white cap with red ring), enabling visual confirmation of proper sealing. Over two years, no surgical pathology specimens were lost post-intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The RCA-driven reforms effectively addressed systemic flaws in specimen management, demonstrating that targeted process redesign, ergonomic tools, and digital tracking can mitigate risks of medical errors. This case highlights the importance of analyzing localized workflow failures within broader systemic contexts to build resilient, patient-centered medical care systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"18 ","pages":"2139-2150"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12212431/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S527015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In 2022, a critical incident occurred at a Chinese hospital where a surgical specimen from a rectal prostate procedure was misplaced, necessitating repeat surgery for the patient. This event underscored systemic vulnerabilities in specimen handling processes and catalyzed an investigation into how healthcare systems manage medical errors to uphold patient safety.

Methods: Using root cause analysis (RCA), we dissected the workflow gaps and organizational factors contributing to the specimen loss. Key failures identified included unclear role delineation among staff, inadequate specimen labeling protocols, and lack of real-time tracking mechanisms. Three interventions were implemented: (1) Redesigning specimen handling workflows with explicit role responsibilities; (2) Developing standardized, color-coded specimen bottles and racks to improve visual identification; (3) Integrating an electronic tracking system for closed-loop management of specimens.

Results: Post-intervention, the recognition rate of post-use specimen vials improved from 0% to 100% after implementing a dual-color sealing system (white cap with red ring), enabling visual confirmation of proper sealing. Over two years, no surgical pathology specimens were lost post-intervention.

Conclusion: The RCA-driven reforms effectively addressed systemic flaws in specimen management, demonstrating that targeted process redesign, ergonomic tools, and digital tracking can mitigate risks of medical errors. This case highlights the importance of analyzing localized workflow failures within broader systemic contexts to build resilient, patient-centered medical care systems.

追踪缺失手术标本:基于根本原因分析的不良事件质量改进策略。
背景:2022年,中国一家医院发生了一起严重事件,直肠前列腺手术标本放错了地方,需要对患者进行重复手术。这一事件强调了标本处理过程中的系统性脆弱性,并促使人们对医疗保健系统如何管理医疗差错以维护患者安全进行调查。方法:使用根本原因分析(RCA),我们剖析了导致标本丢失的工作流程差距和组织因素。确定的主要失败包括工作人员角色描述不清楚,标本标记协议不充分以及缺乏实时跟踪机制。实施了三种干预措施:(1)重新设计具有明确角色职责的标本处理工作流程;(2)开发标准化、彩色编码的标本瓶和标本架,提高视觉识别能力;(3)集成电子跟踪系统,实现标本闭环管理。结果:干预后,采用双色封盖(白盖红环)封盖后,使用后小瓶标本的识别率由0%提高到100%,可直观确认封盖是否正确。术后2年多无手术病理标本丢失。结论:rca驱动的改革有效地解决了标本管理中的系统性缺陷,表明有针对性的流程重新设计、人体工程学工具和数字跟踪可以降低医疗差错的风险。本案例强调了在更广泛的系统环境中分析本地化工作流失败的重要性,以建立有弹性的、以患者为中心的医疗保健系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Public and community health Policy and law Preventative and predictive healthcare Risk and hazard management Epidemiology, detection and screening Lifestyle and diet modification Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs Health and safety and occupational health Healthcare services provision Health literacy and education Advertising and promotion of health issues Health economic evaluations and resource management Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信