Comparison of Clinical and Angiographic Outcomes of Ranibizumab and Aflibercept in Type 1 and Aggressive Retinopathy of Prematurity.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Wenting Zhang, Haonan Ma, Jianhui Wang, Zhijun Chen, Xuerui Zhang, Haodong Xiao, Huanyu Liu, Yuan Yang, Jiawei Yin, Mingyang Wang, Jie Peng, Yu Xu, Peiquan Zhao
{"title":"Comparison of Clinical and Angiographic Outcomes of Ranibizumab and Aflibercept in Type 1 and Aggressive Retinopathy of Prematurity.","authors":"Wenting Zhang, Haonan Ma, Jianhui Wang, Zhijun Chen, Xuerui Zhang, Haodong Xiao, Huanyu Liu, Yuan Yang, Jiawei Yin, Mingyang Wang, Jie Peng, Yu Xu, Peiquan Zhao","doi":"10.1111/ceo.14575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To compare the clinical and angiographic outcomes of aggressive retinopathy of prematurity (A-ROP) and type 1 retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) treated with intravitreal injection of ranibizumab (IVR) or aflibercept (IVA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, non-randomised study included a consecutive series of patients with type 1 ROP or A-ROP who initially treated with ranibizumab (0.25 mg/0.025 mL) or aflibercept (1.0 mg/0.025 mL) between October 2017 and November 2020. Clinical data and long-term vascular characteristics were analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 297 eyes of 151 infants were included. Compared to IVA, IVR was a significant risk factor for reactivation in multivariate regression analysis. The risk time of reactivation in A-ROP and Type 1 Zone I ROP was shorter in the IVR group (p < 0.001). Fewer injections were required in the IVA group for patients with A-ROP and Type 1 Zone I ROP (p = 0.012). More vascular abnormalities were observed in the IVA group during reactivation, with increased arteriovenous shunting (p = 0.028) in Type 1 Zone II ROP and more tortuosity (p = 0.047), dilation (p = 0.047) and plus disease (p = 0.020) in Type 1 Zone I ROP and A-ROP. In fundus fluorescein angiography, staining of the vessel wall and telangiectasia were more frequent in the IVA group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ranibizumab treatment was associated with a higher rate of reactivation and a shorter risk period for reactivation compared to aflibercept, potentially requiring more frequent injections, though some differences did not reach statistical significance. However, there were more signs of vascular abnormalities after receiving aflibercept treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":55253,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ceo.14575","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To compare the clinical and angiographic outcomes of aggressive retinopathy of prematurity (A-ROP) and type 1 retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) treated with intravitreal injection of ranibizumab (IVR) or aflibercept (IVA).

Methods: This retrospective, non-randomised study included a consecutive series of patients with type 1 ROP or A-ROP who initially treated with ranibizumab (0.25 mg/0.025 mL) or aflibercept (1.0 mg/0.025 mL) between October 2017 and November 2020. Clinical data and long-term vascular characteristics were analysed.

Results: A total of 297 eyes of 151 infants were included. Compared to IVA, IVR was a significant risk factor for reactivation in multivariate regression analysis. The risk time of reactivation in A-ROP and Type 1 Zone I ROP was shorter in the IVR group (p < 0.001). Fewer injections were required in the IVA group for patients with A-ROP and Type 1 Zone I ROP (p = 0.012). More vascular abnormalities were observed in the IVA group during reactivation, with increased arteriovenous shunting (p = 0.028) in Type 1 Zone II ROP and more tortuosity (p = 0.047), dilation (p = 0.047) and plus disease (p = 0.020) in Type 1 Zone I ROP and A-ROP. In fundus fluorescein angiography, staining of the vessel wall and telangiectasia were more frequent in the IVA group.

Conclusions: Ranibizumab treatment was associated with a higher rate of reactivation and a shorter risk period for reactivation compared to aflibercept, potentially requiring more frequent injections, though some differences did not reach statistical significance. However, there were more signs of vascular abnormalities after receiving aflibercept treatment.

雷尼单抗和阿非利塞普治疗1型和侵袭性早产儿视网膜病变的临床和血管造影结果比较。
背景:比较玻璃体内注射雷尼单抗(IVR)或阿非利西普(IVA)治疗侵袭性早产儿视网膜病变(A-ROP)和1型早产儿视网膜病变(ROP)的临床和血管造影结果。方法:这项回顾性、非随机研究纳入了一系列连续的1型ROP或a型ROP患者,这些患者最初接受雷尼单抗(0.25 mg/0.025 mL)或阿非利西普(1.0 mg/0.025 mL)治疗,时间为2017年10月至2020年11月。分析临床资料及长期血管特征。结果:共纳入151例患儿297只眼。与IVA相比,在多变量回归分析中,IVR是再激活的重要危险因素。结论:与阿非利西普相比,雷尼珠单抗治疗与更高的再激活率和更短的再激活风险期相关,可能需要更频繁的注射,但一些差异没有达到统计学意义。然而,接受阿布西普治疗后,血管异常的迹象更多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
150
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology is the official journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original research and reviews dealing with all aspects of clinical practice and research which are international in scope and application. CEO recognises the importance of collaborative research and welcomes papers that have a direct influence on ophthalmic practice but are not unique to ophthalmology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信