Intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor therapy during pregnancy: an update and current perspective.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Kevin X Zhang, Curtis J Heisel, Safa Rahmani
{"title":"Intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor therapy during pregnancy: an update and current perspective.","authors":"Kevin X Zhang, Curtis J Heisel, Safa Rahmani","doi":"10.1097/ICU.0000000000001160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Many ocular neovascular diseases, including diabetic retinopathy (DR) and diabetic macular edema (DME), are significant complications that can worsen during pregnancy, posing risks to vision. Antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents represent the mainstay of DR and DME treatment in nonpregnant populations. However, their use in pregnant populations remain controversial due to concerns over fetal safety. This review explores the available literature on anti-VEGF use during pregnancy, evaluating maternal and fetal outcomes, and incorporating lessons learned from their recent use in treating retinopathy of prematurity (ROP).</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Although human data on the safety of anti-VEGF agents during pregnancy remain limited, available studies suggest that systemic absorption is minimal, and concerns regarding potential effects on fetal angiogenesis largely theoretical. Case reports and retrospective studies have not consistently demonstrated harm. Furthermore, several studies examining long-term systemic effects of anti-VEGF use in treating premature infants with ROP reveal no association with adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes when compared to untreated ROP or ROP treated with laser photocoagulation alone.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>While the use of anti-VEGF agents in pregnancy remains controversial, recent evidence suggests they should not be categorically excluded as a treatment option. Until more causal studies emerge, treatment decisions should be individualized, balancing disease severity, maternal visual function, and fetal safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":50604,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0000000000001160","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Many ocular neovascular diseases, including diabetic retinopathy (DR) and diabetic macular edema (DME), are significant complications that can worsen during pregnancy, posing risks to vision. Antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents represent the mainstay of DR and DME treatment in nonpregnant populations. However, their use in pregnant populations remain controversial due to concerns over fetal safety. This review explores the available literature on anti-VEGF use during pregnancy, evaluating maternal and fetal outcomes, and incorporating lessons learned from their recent use in treating retinopathy of prematurity (ROP).

Recent findings: Although human data on the safety of anti-VEGF agents during pregnancy remain limited, available studies suggest that systemic absorption is minimal, and concerns regarding potential effects on fetal angiogenesis largely theoretical. Case reports and retrospective studies have not consistently demonstrated harm. Furthermore, several studies examining long-term systemic effects of anti-VEGF use in treating premature infants with ROP reveal no association with adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes when compared to untreated ROP or ROP treated with laser photocoagulation alone.

Summary: While the use of anti-VEGF agents in pregnancy remains controversial, recent evidence suggests they should not be categorically excluded as a treatment option. Until more causal studies emerge, treatment decisions should be individualized, balancing disease severity, maternal visual function, and fetal safety.

妊娠期间玻璃体内抗血管内皮生长因子治疗:最新和当前的观点。
综述目的:许多眼部新生血管疾病,包括糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)和糖尿病黄斑水肿(DME),是妊娠期间可能恶化的重要并发症,对视力构成威胁。抗血管内皮生长因子(anti-VEGF)药物是非妊娠人群DR和DME治疗的主要药物。然而,由于对胎儿安全的担忧,它们在怀孕人群中的使用仍然存在争议。这篇综述探讨了妊娠期间抗vegf使用的现有文献,评估了母体和胎儿的结局,并结合了他们最近治疗早产儿视网膜病变(ROP)的经验教训。最新发现:尽管妊娠期间抗vegf药物安全性的人体数据仍然有限,但现有研究表明,全身吸收很小,对胎儿血管生成的潜在影响的担忧主要是理论上的。病例报告和回顾性研究并没有一致地证明危害。此外,几项研究考察了抗vegf治疗早产儿ROP的长期全身效应,结果显示,与未经治疗的ROP或单独使用激光光凝治疗的ROP相比,与不良的神经发育结局没有关联。摘要:虽然抗vegf药物在妊娠期的使用仍有争议,但最近的证据表明,不应将其作为一种治疗选择断然排除在外。在更多的因果研究出现之前,治疗决定应该个体化,平衡疾病的严重程度、母亲的视觉功能和胎儿的安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.40%
发文量
120
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Ophthalmology is an indispensable resource featuring key up-to-date and important advances in the field from around the world. With renowned guest editors for each section, every bimonthly issue of Current Opinion in Ophthalmology delivers a fresh insight into topics such as glaucoma, refractive surgery and corneal and external disorders. With ten sections in total, the journal provides a convenient and thorough review of the field and will be of interest to researchers, clinicians and other healthcare professionals alike.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信