Profile of impairments in social and non-social cognition in vascular dementia compared to Alzheimer's disease and behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia.

IF 2.6 4区 心理学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Fijanne Strijkert, Rients Bauke Huitema, Barbara Charlotte van Munster, Jacoba Margje Spikman
{"title":"Profile of impairments in social and non-social cognition in vascular dementia compared to Alzheimer's disease and behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia.","authors":"Fijanne Strijkert, Rients Bauke Huitema, Barbara Charlotte van Munster, Jacoba Margje Spikman","doi":"10.1017/S1355617725101045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Impairments in emotion recognition, a crucial component of social cognition, have been previously demonstrated in patients with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bv-FTD) and Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, to date, it is unclear whether patients with early-stage vascular dementia (VaD) display deficient emotion recognition. We investigated profiles of impairments in emotion recognition and non-social cognitive functions, comparing VaD patients to bv-FTD and AD patients, and healthy control participants (HC).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Eighty-one memory clinic patients with early-stage VaD (<i>n</i> = 30), bv-FTD (<i>n</i> = 21) and AD (<i>n</i> = 30), and 40 HCs were included and performed Ekman 60 Faces Test (EFT; emotion recognition), Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT; memory - encoding and retrieval) and Trailmaking Test (TMT A, TMT B, TMT B/A; information processing speed, executive functions). Differences between groups were analyzed with analysis of variance (ANOVA), using age, education and sex adjusted norm Z scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patient groups performed significantly worse than HCs on EFT (<i>p</i> < .001). Mean performance of VaD patients was in between bv-FTD and AD (only bv-FTD < AD, <i>p</i> < .01). All patient groups were also impaired on AVLT encoding, TMT-B and TMT B/A. Social and non-social neurocognitive functions differed between groups, with specific impairments in processing speed in VaD, emotion recognition in bv-FTD and memory retrieval in AD, and memory encoding and cognitive control impaired in all three groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found significantly different profiles in VaD, bv-FTD and AD. Assessing emotion recognition has additive value in the distinction between patient groups, allowing for more timely and accurate diagnosis in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":49995,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617725101045","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Impairments in emotion recognition, a crucial component of social cognition, have been previously demonstrated in patients with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bv-FTD) and Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, to date, it is unclear whether patients with early-stage vascular dementia (VaD) display deficient emotion recognition. We investigated profiles of impairments in emotion recognition and non-social cognitive functions, comparing VaD patients to bv-FTD and AD patients, and healthy control participants (HC).

Method: Eighty-one memory clinic patients with early-stage VaD (n = 30), bv-FTD (n = 21) and AD (n = 30), and 40 HCs were included and performed Ekman 60 Faces Test (EFT; emotion recognition), Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT; memory - encoding and retrieval) and Trailmaking Test (TMT A, TMT B, TMT B/A; information processing speed, executive functions). Differences between groups were analyzed with analysis of variance (ANOVA), using age, education and sex adjusted norm Z scores.

Results: All patient groups performed significantly worse than HCs on EFT (p < .001). Mean performance of VaD patients was in between bv-FTD and AD (only bv-FTD < AD, p < .01). All patient groups were also impaired on AVLT encoding, TMT-B and TMT B/A. Social and non-social neurocognitive functions differed between groups, with specific impairments in processing speed in VaD, emotion recognition in bv-FTD and memory retrieval in AD, and memory encoding and cognitive control impaired in all three groups.

Conclusions: We found significantly different profiles in VaD, bv-FTD and AD. Assessing emotion recognition has additive value in the distinction between patient groups, allowing for more timely and accurate diagnosis in clinical practice.

与阿尔茨海默病和行为变异额颞叶痴呆相比,血管性痴呆患者的社会和非社会认知障碍概况
目的:情绪识别是社会认知的一个重要组成部分,先前已经在行为变异性额颞叶痴呆(bv-FTD)和阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者中得到证实。然而,到目前为止,尚不清楚早期血管性痴呆(VaD)患者是否表现出情绪识别缺陷。我们研究了VaD患者与bv-FTD和AD患者以及健康对照组(HC)的情绪识别和非社会认知功能障碍的概况。方法:选取临床早期VaD (n = 30)、bv-FTD (n = 21)、AD (n = 30)患者81例,hc患者40例,进行Ekman 60 Faces Test (EFT;情绪识别),听觉语言学习测试(AVLT;记忆-编码和检索)和线索形成测试(TMT A, TMT B, TMT B/A;信息处理速度,执行功能)。组间差异采用方差分析(ANOVA),采用年龄、教育程度和性别调整后的norm Z得分。结果:所有患者组EFT表现均明显差于hc组(p < 0.001)。VaD患者的平均表现介于bv-FTD和AD之间(只有bv-FTD < AD, p < 0.01)。所有患者组AVLT编码、TMT-B和TMT B/A均受损。社会和非社会神经认知功能在两组之间存在差异,在VaD的处理速度、bv-FTD的情绪识别和AD的记忆检索方面存在特异性损伤,并且三组都存在记忆编码和认知控制受损。结论:我们发现VaD、bv-FTD和AD有显著差异。评估情绪识别在区分患者群体方面具有附加价值,允许在临床实践中更及时和准确的诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
185
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society is the official journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, an organization of over 4,500 international members from a variety of disciplines. The Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society welcomes original, creative, high quality research papers covering all areas of neuropsychology. The focus of articles may be primarily experimental, applied, or clinical. Contributions will broadly reflect the interest of all areas of neuropsychology, including but not limited to: development of cognitive processes, brain-behavior relationships, adult and pediatric neuropsychology, neurobehavioral syndromes (such as aphasia or apraxia), and the interfaces of neuropsychology with related areas such as behavioral neurology, neuropsychiatry, genetics, and cognitive neuroscience. Papers that utilize behavioral, neuroimaging, and electrophysiological measures are appropriate. To assure maximum flexibility and to promote diverse mechanisms of scholarly communication, the following formats are available in addition to a Regular Research Article: Brief Communication is a shorter research article; Rapid Communication is intended for "fast breaking" new work that does not yet justify a full length article and is placed on a fast review track; Case Report is a theoretically important and unique case study; Critical Review and Short Review are thoughtful considerations of topics of importance to neuropsychology and include meta-analyses; Dialogue provides a forum for publishing two distinct positions on controversial issues in a point-counterpoint format; Special Issue and Special Section consist of several articles linked thematically; Letter to the Editor responds to recent articles published in the Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society; and Book Review, which is considered but is no longer solicited.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信