Current status, perceptions, and barriers regarding weight loss approaches in China.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Ziwei Lin, Hao Zhu, Si Si, Jiawei Xu, Esther Artime, Swarna Khare, Victoria Higgins, Andrea Leith, Yan Bi
{"title":"Current status, perceptions, and barriers regarding weight loss approaches in China.","authors":"Ziwei Lin, Hao Zhu, Si Si, Jiawei Xu, Esther Artime, Swarna Khare, Victoria Higgins, Andrea Leith, Yan Bi","doi":"10.1007/s12020-025-04315-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To describe management and barriers regarding weight loss in China.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Data were from the Adelphi Real World Obesity Disease Specific Programme™, a cross-sectional survey between April and July 2022 in Chinese clinical practice. Physicians managing people with obesity or overweight (PwO) and PwO aged ≥ 18 years, under weight management programs, and/or with a body mass index ≥ 28 kg/m<sup>2</sup> were eligible.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>100 physicians and 801 PwO were included. Before current clinical management, PwO had attempted self-management using their own diet (87%) and exercise (84%) programs, natural remedies/diet pills sold on the internet (26%) or over the counter diet pills (19%). Physicians reported that typical first-line weight management methods in clinical practice were diet (82%) and exercise (82%), with half (50%) using drug approaches. Only 19% of PwO reported full compliance with diet and exercise programs. Among the 78 physicians who used anti-obesity medications (AOMs), the single most important reason for initiating AOM was failure to reach the desired weight loss with diet and exercise alone (58%). Of the 78 physicians, 67% felt that most weight loss approaches always fail and 73% felt that AOM options were restricted; the top rated single most desired improvements in future AOMs were improved or greater efficacy (26%) and safer long-term use (26%). Of PwO, most (88%) had some willingness to try a new AOM.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PwO usually self-managed initial weight loss attempts. Physicians typically initiated lifestyle interventions as first-line treatment despite low PwO compliance. Both physicians and PwO desired improved AOMs. Of note, no approved prescription-only AOMs were available in China during the time window of the study.</p>","PeriodicalId":49211,"journal":{"name":"Endocrine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-025-04315-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To describe management and barriers regarding weight loss in China.

Materials and methods: Data were from the Adelphi Real World Obesity Disease Specific Programme™, a cross-sectional survey between April and July 2022 in Chinese clinical practice. Physicians managing people with obesity or overweight (PwO) and PwO aged ≥ 18 years, under weight management programs, and/or with a body mass index ≥ 28 kg/m2 were eligible.

Results: 100 physicians and 801 PwO were included. Before current clinical management, PwO had attempted self-management using their own diet (87%) and exercise (84%) programs, natural remedies/diet pills sold on the internet (26%) or over the counter diet pills (19%). Physicians reported that typical first-line weight management methods in clinical practice were diet (82%) and exercise (82%), with half (50%) using drug approaches. Only 19% of PwO reported full compliance with diet and exercise programs. Among the 78 physicians who used anti-obesity medications (AOMs), the single most important reason for initiating AOM was failure to reach the desired weight loss with diet and exercise alone (58%). Of the 78 physicians, 67% felt that most weight loss approaches always fail and 73% felt that AOM options were restricted; the top rated single most desired improvements in future AOMs were improved or greater efficacy (26%) and safer long-term use (26%). Of PwO, most (88%) had some willingness to try a new AOM.

Conclusion: PwO usually self-managed initial weight loss attempts. Physicians typically initiated lifestyle interventions as first-line treatment despite low PwO compliance. Both physicians and PwO desired improved AOMs. Of note, no approved prescription-only AOMs were available in China during the time window of the study.

中国减肥方法的现状、认知和障碍。
目的:描述在中国减肥的管理和障碍。材料和方法:数据来自Adelphi Real World Obesity Disease Specific program™,这是一项横断面调查,于2022年4月至7月在中国临床实践中进行。管理肥胖或超重(PwO)和年龄≥18岁、体重管理计划下和/或体重指数≥28 kg/m2的pw患者的医生符合条件。结果:共纳入100名内科医生和801名PwO。在目前的临床管理之前,PwO曾尝试通过自己的饮食(87%)和运动(84%)计划、自然疗法/网上销售的减肥药(26%)或非处方减肥药(19%)进行自我管理。医生报告临床实践中典型的一线体重管理方法是饮食(82%)和运动(82%),其中一半(50%)使用药物方法。只有19%的PwO报告完全遵守了饮食和锻炼计划。在使用抗肥胖药物(AOMs)的78名医生中,使用抗肥胖药物的最重要原因是仅通过饮食和运动无法达到预期的体重减轻(58%)。在78名医生中,67%的人认为大多数减肥方法总是失败,73%的人认为AOM的选择受到限制;对未来AOMs最期望的改进是改善或更大的疗效(26%)和更安全的长期使用(26%)。在wpo中,大多数(88%)愿意尝试新的AOM。结论:ppo通常是自我管理的初始减肥尝试。尽管pvo依从性较低,但医生通常将生活方式干预作为一线治疗。医生和PwO都希望改善AOMs。值得注意的是,在研究的时间窗口期间,中国没有批准的仅限处方的AOMs。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Endocrine
Endocrine ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.40%
发文量
295
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Well-established as a major journal in today’s rapidly advancing experimental and clinical research areas, Endocrine publishes original articles devoted to basic (including molecular, cellular and physiological studies), translational and clinical research in all the different fields of endocrinology and metabolism. Articles will be accepted based on peer-reviews, priority, and editorial decision. Invited reviews, mini-reviews and viewpoints on relevant pathophysiological and clinical topics, as well as Editorials on articles appearing in the Journal, are published. Unsolicited Editorials will be evaluated by the editorial team. Outcomes of scientific meetings, as well as guidelines and position statements, may be submitted. The Journal also considers special feature articles in the field of endocrine genetics and epigenetics, as well as articles devoted to novel methods and techniques in endocrinology. Endocrine covers controversial, clinical endocrine issues. Meta-analyses on endocrine and metabolic topics are also accepted. Descriptions of single clinical cases and/or small patients studies are not published unless of exceptional interest. However, reports of novel imaging studies and endocrine side effects in single patients may be considered. Research letters and letters to the editor related or unrelated to recently published articles can be submitted. Endocrine covers leading topics in endocrinology such as neuroendocrinology, pituitary and hypothalamic peptides, thyroid physiological and clinical aspects, bone and mineral metabolism and osteoporosis, obesity, lipid and energy metabolism and food intake control, insulin, Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes, hormones of male and female reproduction, adrenal diseases pediatric and geriatric endocrinology, endocrine hypertension and endocrine oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信