Effects of a Family-Centered Teaching Model on Occupational Therapy Interns' Perceptions and Children's Occupational Performance.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Jung-Jiun Shie, Min-Yuan Yu, Shao-Hsia Chang, Yu-Hsuan Lin
{"title":"Effects of a Family-Centered Teaching Model on Occupational Therapy Interns' Perceptions and Children's Occupational Performance.","authors":"Jung-Jiun Shie, Min-Yuan Yu, Shao-Hsia Chang, Yu-Hsuan Lin","doi":"10.1080/01942638.2025.2522748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To compare perceptions of family-centered behaviors and children's occupational performance between occupational therapy interns in Taiwan who received a family-centered teaching (FACT) model and those who received a conventional family approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A two-group quasi-experimental design was employed. Participants included 49 interns, 44 caregivers, and 45 children with disabilities under 6 years old. The FACT model consisting of didactic lessons and hands-on practice was developed to strengthen interns' competencies in identifying parental concerns related to children's goals, writing goals using GAS format, and collaborating with caregivers in implementation of interventions. The interns' perceptions of their family-centered behaviors were measured using the Chinese version of the \"Measure of Processes of Care-Service Provider\" (C-MPOC-SP). Children's occupational performance was rated using the \"Canadian Occupational Performance Measure\" (COPM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interns who received the FACT model demonstrated a significant increase in the Showing Interpersonal Sensitivity and Treating People Respectfully scales of C-MPOC-SP compared to the comparison group. The ratings of caregivers who received the FACT model increased significantly for children's performance, but not for satisfaction with performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The family-centered teaching model implemented in the internship increased interns' perception toward more family-centeredness and children's occupational performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":49138,"journal":{"name":"Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01942638.2025.2522748","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To compare perceptions of family-centered behaviors and children's occupational performance between occupational therapy interns in Taiwan who received a family-centered teaching (FACT) model and those who received a conventional family approach.

Methods: A two-group quasi-experimental design was employed. Participants included 49 interns, 44 caregivers, and 45 children with disabilities under 6 years old. The FACT model consisting of didactic lessons and hands-on practice was developed to strengthen interns' competencies in identifying parental concerns related to children's goals, writing goals using GAS format, and collaborating with caregivers in implementation of interventions. The interns' perceptions of their family-centered behaviors were measured using the Chinese version of the "Measure of Processes of Care-Service Provider" (C-MPOC-SP). Children's occupational performance was rated using the "Canadian Occupational Performance Measure" (COPM).

Results: Interns who received the FACT model demonstrated a significant increase in the Showing Interpersonal Sensitivity and Treating People Respectfully scales of C-MPOC-SP compared to the comparison group. The ratings of caregivers who received the FACT model increased significantly for children's performance, but not for satisfaction with performance.

Conclusions: The family-centered teaching model implemented in the internship increased interns' perception toward more family-centeredness and children's occupational performance.

以家庭为中心的教学模式对职业治疗实习生认知及儿童职业绩效的影响。
目的:比较台湾职业治疗实习生接受家庭中心教学模式与传统家庭教学模式对家庭中心行为与儿童职业绩效的认知。方法:采用两组准实验设计。参与者包括49名实习生、44名护理人员和45名6岁以下的残疾儿童。FACT模型由教学课程和实践实践组成,旨在加强实习生在识别与儿童目标相关的父母关注点、使用GAS格式编写目标以及与照顾者合作实施干预措施方面的能力。采用中文版的“护理服务提供者过程量表”(C-MPOC-SP)测量实习生对家庭中心行为的感知。儿童的职业表现使用“加拿大职业表现衡量标准”(COPM)进行评级。结果:与对照组相比,接受FACT模型的实习生在C-MPOC-SP的“表现人际敏感性”和“尊重他人”量表中表现出显著的提高。接受FACT模型的照顾者对儿童表现的评分显著提高,但对表现的满意度没有提高。结论:在实习中实施以家庭为中心的教学模式,增加了实习生对家庭中心的感知,提高了孩子的职业绩效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: 5 issues per year Abstracted and/or indexed in: AMED; British Library Inside; Child Development Abstracts; CINAHL; Contents Pages in Education; EBSCO; Education Research Abstracts (ERA); Education Resources Information Center (ERIC); EMCARE; Excerpta Medica/EMBASE; Family and Society Studies Worldwide; Family Index Database; Google Scholar; HaPI Database; HINARI; Index Copernicus; Intute; JournalSeek; MANTIS; MEDLINE; NewJour; OCLC; OTDBASE; OT SEARCH; Otseeker; PEDro; ProQuest; PsycINFO; PSYCLINE; PubsHub; PubMed; REHABDATA; SCOPUS; SIRC; Social Work Abstracts; Speical Educational Needs Abstracts; SwetsWise; Zetoc (British Library); Science Citation Index Expanded (also known as SciSearch®); Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition; Social Sciences Citation Index®; Journal Citation Reports/ Social Sciences Edition; Current Contents®/Social and Behavioral Sciences; Current Contents®/Clinical Medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信