Brazilian guidelines for the management of tuberculosis infection in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: is retesting in latent tuberculosis screening appropriate and Safe?

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
Carlos Brito, Rita Moraes de Brito
{"title":"Brazilian guidelines for the management of tuberculosis infection in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: is retesting in latent tuberculosis screening appropriate and Safe?","authors":"Carlos Brito, Rita Moraes de Brito","doi":"10.1186/s42358-025-00462-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The article \"Brazilian Recommendations for the Management of Tuberculosis Infection in Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases\" by Viviane de Souza et al. presents important discussions on the subject; however, the recommendation for annual repetition of the TST/IGRA test for three years and after medication changes raises considerable concerns. This approach may lead to overdiagnosis and overtreatment of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). Frequent false-positive results in retests can result in unnecessary antibiotic use, contributing to bacterial resistance, a problem of global significance. The recommendation, considered to have a moderate level of evidence, is subject to criticism. Arguments used to support retesting, such as high conversion rates of tests after one year, reports of tuberculosis cases despite negative screenings being attributed to false negatives, and reliance on other sources with lower levels of evidence, do not constitute sufficient evidence to confirm tuberculosis infection or justify the recommendation. On the other hand, there is evidence that has not been considered in the discussion against the recommendation for retesting, indicating that this practice may increase the risk of diagnosing false-positive infections, leading to overtreatment without clinically proven benefits. Potentially harmful interventions should not be implemented without solid evidence to support them. In this letter to the editor, we briefly discuss this recommendation and the arguments against its implementation, highlighting its associated risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":48634,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Rheumatology","volume":"65 1","pages":"29"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42358-025-00462-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article "Brazilian Recommendations for the Management of Tuberculosis Infection in Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases" by Viviane de Souza et al. presents important discussions on the subject; however, the recommendation for annual repetition of the TST/IGRA test for three years and after medication changes raises considerable concerns. This approach may lead to overdiagnosis and overtreatment of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). Frequent false-positive results in retests can result in unnecessary antibiotic use, contributing to bacterial resistance, a problem of global significance. The recommendation, considered to have a moderate level of evidence, is subject to criticism. Arguments used to support retesting, such as high conversion rates of tests after one year, reports of tuberculosis cases despite negative screenings being attributed to false negatives, and reliance on other sources with lower levels of evidence, do not constitute sufficient evidence to confirm tuberculosis infection or justify the recommendation. On the other hand, there is evidence that has not been considered in the discussion against the recommendation for retesting, indicating that this practice may increase the risk of diagnosing false-positive infections, leading to overtreatment without clinically proven benefits. Potentially harmful interventions should not be implemented without solid evidence to support them. In this letter to the editor, we briefly discuss this recommendation and the arguments against its implementation, highlighting its associated risks.

巴西免疫介导的炎症性疾病结核病感染管理指南:潜伏性结核病筛查重新检测是否适当和安全?
Viviane de Souza等人的文章“巴西关于免疫介导的炎症性疾病中结核病感染管理的建议”提出了关于该主题的重要讨论;然而,建议每年重复TST/IGRA测试3年,并在药物改变后引起了相当大的关注。这种方法可能导致潜伏性结核感染(LTBI)的过度诊断和过度治疗。在复验中频繁出现假阳性结果可能导致不必要的抗生素使用,从而导致细菌耐药性,这是一个具有全球意义的问题。该建议被认为具有中等水平的证据,但受到批评。用于支持重新检测的论据,如一年后检测转换率高、尽管筛查呈阴性但仍有结核病病例报告被归因于假阴性、以及依赖证据水平较低的其他来源,都不构成确认结核病感染的充分证据或证明该建议是合理的。另一方面,在讨论中没有考虑到反对重新检测建议的证据,表明这种做法可能会增加诊断假阳性感染的风险,导致在没有临床证明益处的情况下过度治疗。在没有确凿证据支持的情况下,不应实施可能有害的干预措施。在这封致编辑的信中,我们简要地讨论了这一建议和反对其实施的论据,强调了其相关的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Rheumatology
Advances in Rheumatology Medicine-Rheumatology
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
41
审稿时长
53 weeks
期刊介绍: Formerly named Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia, the journal is celebrating its 60th year of publication. Advances in Rheumatology is an international, open access journal publishing pre-clinical, translational and clinical studies on all aspects of paediatric and adult rheumatic diseases, including degenerative, inflammatory and autoimmune conditions. The journal is the official publication of the Brazilian Society of Rheumatology and welcomes original research (including systematic reviews and meta-analyses), literature reviews, guidelines and letters arising from published material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信