Understanding abstract knowledge structures in implicit perceptual sequence learning.

IF 2.3 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Catalina Duta, Natacha Deroost, Mahyar Firouzi, Frank Van Overwalle, Chris Baeken, Kris Baetens
{"title":"Understanding abstract knowledge structures in implicit perceptual sequence learning.","authors":"Catalina Duta, Natacha Deroost, Mahyar Firouzi, Frank Van Overwalle, Chris Baeken, Kris Baetens","doi":"10.1007/s00426-025-02152-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Traditional approaches to studying perceptual sequence learning (SL) often employ adaptations of the classical serial reaction time task, albeit these tasks suffer from confounding factors such as (oculo)motor learning effects. Unlike motor SL, the extent to which pure perceptual SL can occur implicitly without (oculo)motor learning remains uncertain. We adapted a previously formulated task (Garvert et al., eLife, 6, 1-20, 2017) to isolate perceptual sequence learning, without the interference of (oculo)motor confounds, and to determine whether perceptual sequence learning can occur implicitly. Fifty participants judged whether each object appeared in its original or mirrored form, gradually improving performance based on feedback. Unbeknownst to participants, the succession of these objects followed a probabilistic sequence. A training phase consisting of 8 regular blocks was followed by a testing phase, where 5 random and 5 regular blocks were presented alternatingly. A force-choice recognition test probing knowledge about specific transitions in the task was also used to assess explicit knowledge. Our findings indicate robust perceptual SL effects, as indicated by slower reaction times (RTs) in random blocks than regular blocks. Notably, transitions between objects with higher communicability (i.e., a metric of objects' connectedness within the underlying grid) showed lower RTs in regular, but not random blocks. This indicates that perceptual SL in our task may rely on strategic cognitive processes in response to violations of expectation. Importantly, our results also demonstrate that explicit knowledge of the underlying structure did not influence perceptual SL in any way, suggesting that learning was driven by implicit knowledge.</p>","PeriodicalId":48184,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Research-Psychologische Forschung","volume":"89 4","pages":"115"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Research-Psychologische Forschung","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-025-02152-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traditional approaches to studying perceptual sequence learning (SL) often employ adaptations of the classical serial reaction time task, albeit these tasks suffer from confounding factors such as (oculo)motor learning effects. Unlike motor SL, the extent to which pure perceptual SL can occur implicitly without (oculo)motor learning remains uncertain. We adapted a previously formulated task (Garvert et al., eLife, 6, 1-20, 2017) to isolate perceptual sequence learning, without the interference of (oculo)motor confounds, and to determine whether perceptual sequence learning can occur implicitly. Fifty participants judged whether each object appeared in its original or mirrored form, gradually improving performance based on feedback. Unbeknownst to participants, the succession of these objects followed a probabilistic sequence. A training phase consisting of 8 regular blocks was followed by a testing phase, where 5 random and 5 regular blocks were presented alternatingly. A force-choice recognition test probing knowledge about specific transitions in the task was also used to assess explicit knowledge. Our findings indicate robust perceptual SL effects, as indicated by slower reaction times (RTs) in random blocks than regular blocks. Notably, transitions between objects with higher communicability (i.e., a metric of objects' connectedness within the underlying grid) showed lower RTs in regular, but not random blocks. This indicates that perceptual SL in our task may rely on strategic cognitive processes in response to violations of expectation. Importantly, our results also demonstrate that explicit knowledge of the underlying structure did not influence perceptual SL in any way, suggesting that learning was driven by implicit knowledge.

内隐感知序列学习中抽象知识结构的理解。
知觉序列学习(SL)的传统研究方法通常采用经典序列反应时间任务的改编,尽管这些任务存在(眼)运动学习效应等混杂因素。与运动语言学习不同的是,在没有(眼)运动学习的情况下,纯知觉语言学习在多大程度上可以隐性地发生仍不确定。我们采用了先前制定的任务(Garvert et al., eLife, 6,1 - 20,2017)来隔离感知序列学习,而不受(眼)运动混淆的干扰,并确定感知序列学习是否可以隐式发生。50名参与者判断每个物体是以原始形式出现还是以镜像形式出现,并根据反馈逐步提高表现。参与者不知道的是,这些物体的顺序遵循一个概率顺序。训练阶段由8个规则块组成,随后是测试阶段,其中5个随机块和5个规则块交替呈现。一个探索任务中特定过渡知识的强迫选择识别测试也被用来评估外显知识。我们的研究结果表明,随机街区的反应时间(RTs)比常规街区慢,这表明知觉SL效应很强。值得注意的是,具有较高通信能力的对象之间的转换(即,对象在底层网格中的连接度度量)在规则而不是随机块中显示出较低的RTs。这表明,我们任务中的感知SL可能依赖于对违反预期的反应的战略认知过程。重要的是,我们的研究结果还表明,对底层结构的显性知识不会以任何方式影响感知SL,这表明学习是由内隐知识驱动的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
8.70%
发文量
137
期刊介绍: Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung publishes articles that contribute to a basic understanding of human perception, attention, memory, and action. The Journal is devoted to the dissemination of knowledge based on firm experimental ground, but not to particular approaches or schools of thought. Theoretical and historical papers are welcome to the extent that they serve this general purpose; papers of an applied nature are acceptable if they contribute to basic understanding or serve to bridge the often felt gap between basic and applied research in the field covered by the Journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信