"I did it before, so I can do it again(?)": Recalling success, expectations of future success and the impact of ease-of-retrieval and attributions.

IF 2.3 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Adam Abdulla, Ruth Woods
{"title":"\"I did it before, so I can do it again(?)\": Recalling success, expectations of future success and the impact of ease-of-retrieval and attributions.","authors":"Adam Abdulla, Ruth Woods","doi":"10.1007/s00426-025-02136-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It is widely assumed that recalling past success raises expectations of future success (\"expectancy\"). However, experimental research investigating that assumption has generated mixed results. The present study examined two (meta)cognitive factors that may play a role during \"recall success\" interventions: ease-of-retrieval (i.e. the ease/difficulty with which success is recalled) and causal attributions (i.e. the factors to which the success is attributed). Three experiments were conducted with English-speaking adults across the world. After being asked to recall either attraction \"success(es)\" or attraction \"failure(s),\" participants reported the extent to which they expected to attract someone in the future (\"expectancy\"). Results suggest that difficulty in retrieving examples of success and failure to attribute recalled success to stable/general factors have a negative impact on expectancy. Moreover, individuals with low self-perceived mate value are apparently more likely to experience difficulty-in-retrieval and less likely to attribute (attraction) success to stable/general factors. Unless ease-of-retrieval and attributions are addressed, those most in need of an expectancy boost may not benefit from \"recall success\" interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48184,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Research-Psychologische Forschung","volume":"89 4","pages":"117"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12222241/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Research-Psychologische Forschung","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-025-02136-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is widely assumed that recalling past success raises expectations of future success ("expectancy"). However, experimental research investigating that assumption has generated mixed results. The present study examined two (meta)cognitive factors that may play a role during "recall success" interventions: ease-of-retrieval (i.e. the ease/difficulty with which success is recalled) and causal attributions (i.e. the factors to which the success is attributed). Three experiments were conducted with English-speaking adults across the world. After being asked to recall either attraction "success(es)" or attraction "failure(s)," participants reported the extent to which they expected to attract someone in the future ("expectancy"). Results suggest that difficulty in retrieving examples of success and failure to attribute recalled success to stable/general factors have a negative impact on expectancy. Moreover, individuals with low self-perceived mate value are apparently more likely to experience difficulty-in-retrieval and less likely to attribute (attraction) success to stable/general factors. Unless ease-of-retrieval and attributions are addressed, those most in need of an expectancy boost may not benefit from "recall success" interventions.

“我以前做过,所以我可以再做一次。”:回忆成功、对未来成功的期望以及易检索性和归因的影响。
人们普遍认为,回忆过去的成功会提高对未来成功的期望(“期望”)。然而,调查这一假设的实验研究产生了不同的结果。本研究考察了可能在“回忆成功”干预中起作用的两个(元)认知因素:检索的容易程度(即回忆成功的容易/困难程度)和因果归因(即归因成功的因素)。研究人员对世界各地说英语的成年人进行了三个实验。在被要求回忆吸引“成功”或“失败”之后,参与者报告了他们期望在未来吸引某人的程度(“期望”)。结果表明,难以检索成功和失败的例子,将回忆的成功归因于稳定/一般因素,对期望有负面影响。此外,自我感知配偶价值低的个体显然更有可能经历恢复困难,更不可能将(吸引)成功归因于稳定/一般因素。除非易于检索和归因得到解决,否则那些最需要提高期望的人可能不会从“回忆成功”干预中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
8.70%
发文量
137
期刊介绍: Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung publishes articles that contribute to a basic understanding of human perception, attention, memory, and action. The Journal is devoted to the dissemination of knowledge based on firm experimental ground, but not to particular approaches or schools of thought. Theoretical and historical papers are welcome to the extent that they serve this general purpose; papers of an applied nature are acceptable if they contribute to basic understanding or serve to bridge the often felt gap between basic and applied research in the field covered by the Journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信