Immunotherapy in advanced endometrial cancer with microsatellite instability: A systematic review.

IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Cristina Moreno-Ramos, Manuel David Gil-Sierra, María Del Pilar Briceño-Casado
{"title":"Immunotherapy in advanced endometrial cancer with microsatellite instability: A systematic review.","authors":"Cristina Moreno-Ramos, Manuel David Gil-Sierra, María Del Pilar Briceño-Casado","doi":"10.1016/j.farma.2025.05.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endometrial cancer with microsatellite instability (MSI) involves 30% of diagnosed cases. There are some uncertainty about second-line treatment, after platinum-based first-line treatment. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review on the scientific evidence of immunotherapies for endometrial cancer with MSI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed and Embase databases were searched up to May 28, 2024. We included clinical trials about patients with mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) or high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) diagnosed with advanced and/or metastatic endometrial cancer who had previously received platinum-based chemotherapy. Clinical trials with a dMMR or MSI-H population size of less than 10 patients were discarded. Efficacy results in overall survival, progression-free survival and objective response rate were used to determine the most interesting drugs. A safety analysis of therapies was developed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-four studies were found in a systematic search. Fourteen clinical trials were selected. The following drugs were evaluated: pembrolizumab monotherapy, pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib, durvalumab, durvalumab-tremelimumab combination, dostarlimab, nivolumab and avelumab. The greatest numerical efficacy effect was achieved by pembrolizumab, followed by pembrolizumab in combination with lenvatinib. The most common adverse events were fatigue and gastrointestinal disorders.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The efficacy of pembrolizumab and pembrolizumab-lenvatinib regimen appears promising. However, studies with larger sample size, longer follow-up and comparative design with subgroup analysis based on differences in microsatellite repair mechanisms are needed for proper therapeutic positioning.</p>","PeriodicalId":45860,"journal":{"name":"FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.farma.2025.05.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Endometrial cancer with microsatellite instability (MSI) involves 30% of diagnosed cases. There are some uncertainty about second-line treatment, after platinum-based first-line treatment. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review on the scientific evidence of immunotherapies for endometrial cancer with MSI.

Methods: PubMed and Embase databases were searched up to May 28, 2024. We included clinical trials about patients with mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) or high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) diagnosed with advanced and/or metastatic endometrial cancer who had previously received platinum-based chemotherapy. Clinical trials with a dMMR or MSI-H population size of less than 10 patients were discarded. Efficacy results in overall survival, progression-free survival and objective response rate were used to determine the most interesting drugs. A safety analysis of therapies was developed.

Results: Fifty-four studies were found in a systematic search. Fourteen clinical trials were selected. The following drugs were evaluated: pembrolizumab monotherapy, pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib, durvalumab, durvalumab-tremelimumab combination, dostarlimab, nivolumab and avelumab. The greatest numerical efficacy effect was achieved by pembrolizumab, followed by pembrolizumab in combination with lenvatinib. The most common adverse events were fatigue and gastrointestinal disorders.

Conclusion: The efficacy of pembrolizumab and pembrolizumab-lenvatinib regimen appears promising. However, studies with larger sample size, longer follow-up and comparative design with subgroup analysis based on differences in microsatellite repair mechanisms are needed for proper therapeutic positioning.

免疫治疗晚期子宫内膜癌伴微卫星不稳定性:系统综述。
背景:子宫内膜癌伴微卫星不稳定性(MSI)占确诊病例的30%。在以铂为基础的一线治疗后,二线治疗存在一些不确定性。本研究的目的是对免疫疗法治疗子宫内膜癌伴MSI的科学证据进行系统回顾。方法:检索截至2024年5月28日的PubMed和Embase数据库。我们纳入了先前接受过铂类化疗的晚期和/或转移性子宫内膜癌患者的错配修复缺陷(dMMR)或高微卫星不稳定性(MSI-H)的临床试验。dMMR或MSI-H人群规模小于10例患者的临床试验被放弃。总生存期、无进展生存期和客观缓解率的疗效结果被用来确定最有兴趣的药物。对治疗方法进行了安全性分析。结果:在系统检索中发现54项研究。选取了14项临床试验。评估了以下药物:派姆单抗单药治疗、派姆单抗联合lenvatinib、durvalumab、durvalumab-tremelimumab联合、dostarlimumab、nivolumab和avelumab。派姆单抗获得的数值疗效效果最大,其次是派姆单抗联合lenvatinib。最常见的不良事件是疲劳和胃肠道紊乱。结论:派姆单抗和派姆单抗-lenvatinib方案的疗效良好。然而,需要更大的样本量、更长的随访时间以及基于微卫星修复机制差异的亚组分析的比较设计来进行适当的治疗定位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA
FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
21.40%
发文量
46
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Una gran revista para acceder a los mejores artículos originales y revisiones de la farmacoterapia actual. Además, es Órgano de expresión científica de la Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria, y está indexada en Index Medicus/Medline, EMBASE/Excerpta Médica, Alert, Internacional Pharmaceutical Abstracts y SCOPUS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信