[Investigation and analysis of occupational disease risk assessment index system in the automotive repair industry].

Q3 Medicine
D X Li, K C Chen, M Zhang, S Ren
{"title":"[Investigation and analysis of occupational disease risk assessment index system in the automotive repair industry].","authors":"D X Li, K C Chen, M Zhang, S Ren","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn121094-20240515-00216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To construct a risk assessment index system for occupational disease hazards in the automotive repair industry using the Delphi method, providing a scientific basis and systematic evaluation framework for occupational hazard management in this sector. <b>Methods:</b> In January 2024, an expert survey method was employed to identify occupational hazard risk indicators through in-depth expert discussions. A multidimensional and hierarchical assessment system was designed based on the two core elements of \"comprehensive prevention-on-site hazards.\" <b>Results:</b> The consultation results from 20 authoritative experts demonstrated that the expert authority coefficient (0.84), coordination coefficient (0.73), and reliability coefficient (0.83) all reached robust levels. The importance scores of the indicators (ranging from 3.47 to 5.59 points) exhibited clear discriminative validity. Ultimately, an assessment system comprising 2 first-level indicators, 5 second-level indicators, and 14 third-level indicators was established. <b>Conclusion:</b> The index system developed in this study demonstrates high scientific rigor and practical applicability. It provides a systematic evaluation tool for the hierarchical management and targeted prevention of occupational disease hazards in the automotive repair industry, offering both theoretical support and practical guidance for occupational hazard risk control in this field.</p>","PeriodicalId":23958,"journal":{"name":"中华劳动卫生职业病杂志","volume":"43 6","pages":"426-429"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华劳动卫生职业病杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn121094-20240515-00216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To construct a risk assessment index system for occupational disease hazards in the automotive repair industry using the Delphi method, providing a scientific basis and systematic evaluation framework for occupational hazard management in this sector. Methods: In January 2024, an expert survey method was employed to identify occupational hazard risk indicators through in-depth expert discussions. A multidimensional and hierarchical assessment system was designed based on the two core elements of "comprehensive prevention-on-site hazards." Results: The consultation results from 20 authoritative experts demonstrated that the expert authority coefficient (0.84), coordination coefficient (0.73), and reliability coefficient (0.83) all reached robust levels. The importance scores of the indicators (ranging from 3.47 to 5.59 points) exhibited clear discriminative validity. Ultimately, an assessment system comprising 2 first-level indicators, 5 second-level indicators, and 14 third-level indicators was established. Conclusion: The index system developed in this study demonstrates high scientific rigor and practical applicability. It provides a systematic evaluation tool for the hierarchical management and targeted prevention of occupational disease hazards in the automotive repair industry, offering both theoretical support and practical guidance for occupational hazard risk control in this field.

汽车维修行业职业病风险评价指标体系的调查与分析
目的:运用德尔菲法构建汽车维修行业职业病危害风险评价指标体系,为该行业职业危害管理提供科学依据和系统评价框架。方法:于2024年1月采用专家调查法,通过专家深入讨论,确定职业危害风险指标。基于“综合预防-现场危害”两个核心要素,设计了多维度、分层次的评价体系。结果:20位权威专家的咨询结果表明,专家权威系数(0.84)、协调系数(0.73)、信度系数(0.83)均达到稳健水平。各指标的重要性得分(3.47 ~ 5.59分)具有明显的判别效度。最终建立了由2个一级指标、5个二级指标、14个三级指标组成的评价体系。结论:本研究建立的指标体系具有较高的科学严谨性和实用性。为汽车维修行业职业病危害分级管理和针对性防治提供了系统的评价工具,为汽车维修行业职业病危害风险控制提供了理论支持和实践指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中华劳动卫生职业病杂志
中华劳动卫生职业病杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9764
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信