Topical Tranexamic Acid, Adrenaline and Bupivacaine Solution for Pain Management and Healing in Split-Thickness Skin Graft Donor Sites: An Open-Label Interventional Study With Randomised Side Allocation.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 CELL BIOLOGY
Pattana Ongkasuwan
{"title":"Topical Tranexamic Acid, Adrenaline and Bupivacaine Solution for Pain Management and Healing in Split-Thickness Skin Graft Donor Sites: An Open-Label Interventional Study With Randomised Side Allocation.","authors":"Pattana Ongkasuwan","doi":"10.1111/wrr.70060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Split-thickness skin graft donor site wounds present significant challenges in pain management and healing optimization. This intra-individual comparative study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a novel topical solution containing tranexamic acid, adrenaline and bupivacaine versus standard paraffin-chlorhexidine dressings, with side allocation determined by computer randomisation after graft harvesting. Twelve patients received standardised solution application on one donor site and standard treatment on the contralateral site, with each side's dressing changes performed according to protocol. The treatment group demonstrated significantly lower mean pain scores across all time intervals (1.1 vs. 5.3 at 24 h, p < 0.001). Mean epithelialization rates at Days 10-14 were higher in the treatment group (97.1% vs. 94.8%, p < 0.05), with faster time to complete healing (median 12 vs. 16 days, p = 0.002). No significant hemodynamic changes occurred following solution application, with only one case of transient tachycardia reported. Vancouver Scar Scale scores at eight weeks showed a trend favouring the treatment (3.8 vs. 4.2, p = 0.15), although this difference was not statistically significant. No infections were observed in either group. These findings suggest that this novel topical solution with transparent film dressing effectively reduces pain and accelerates healing in donor site wounds without compromising safety, providing a promising new option for managing these challenging surgical wounds.</p>","PeriodicalId":23864,"journal":{"name":"Wound Repair and Regeneration","volume":"33 4","pages":"e70060"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wound Repair and Regeneration","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.70060","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Split-thickness skin graft donor site wounds present significant challenges in pain management and healing optimization. This intra-individual comparative study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a novel topical solution containing tranexamic acid, adrenaline and bupivacaine versus standard paraffin-chlorhexidine dressings, with side allocation determined by computer randomisation after graft harvesting. Twelve patients received standardised solution application on one donor site and standard treatment on the contralateral site, with each side's dressing changes performed according to protocol. The treatment group demonstrated significantly lower mean pain scores across all time intervals (1.1 vs. 5.3 at 24 h, p < 0.001). Mean epithelialization rates at Days 10-14 were higher in the treatment group (97.1% vs. 94.8%, p < 0.05), with faster time to complete healing (median 12 vs. 16 days, p = 0.002). No significant hemodynamic changes occurred following solution application, with only one case of transient tachycardia reported. Vancouver Scar Scale scores at eight weeks showed a trend favouring the treatment (3.8 vs. 4.2, p = 0.15), although this difference was not statistically significant. No infections were observed in either group. These findings suggest that this novel topical solution with transparent film dressing effectively reduces pain and accelerates healing in donor site wounds without compromising safety, providing a promising new option for managing these challenging surgical wounds.

局部氨甲环酸、肾上腺素和布比卡因溶液用于裂厚皮肤移植供体疼痛管理和愈合:一项随机侧分配的开放标签介入研究。
裂开厚度的皮肤移植供体伤口在疼痛管理和愈合优化方面提出了重大挑战。这项个体内比较研究评估了一种含有氨甲环酸、肾上腺素和布比卡因的新型外用溶液与标准石蜡-氯己定敷料的有效性和安全性,在移植物收获后通过计算机随机化确定侧面分配。12例患者在一侧供体部位应用标准化溶液,在对侧部位进行标准治疗,每侧根据方案进行换药。治疗组在所有时间间隔内均表现出较低的平均疼痛评分(1.1比5.3,24小时,p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wound Repair and Regeneration
Wound Repair and Regeneration 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
71
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Wound Repair and Regeneration provides extensive international coverage of cellular and molecular biology, connective tissue, and biological mediator studies in the field of tissue repair and regeneration and serves a diverse audience of surgeons, plastic surgeons, dermatologists, biochemists, cell biologists, and others. Wound Repair and Regeneration is the official journal of The Wound Healing Society, The European Tissue Repair Society, The Japanese Society for Wound Healing, and The Australian Wound Management Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信