Topical Tranexamic Acid, Adrenaline and Bupivacaine Solution for Pain Management and Healing in Split-Thickness Skin Graft Donor Sites: An Open-Label Interventional Study With Randomised Side Allocation.
{"title":"Topical Tranexamic Acid, Adrenaline and Bupivacaine Solution for Pain Management and Healing in Split-Thickness Skin Graft Donor Sites: An Open-Label Interventional Study With Randomised Side Allocation.","authors":"Pattana Ongkasuwan","doi":"10.1111/wrr.70060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Split-thickness skin graft donor site wounds present significant challenges in pain management and healing optimization. This intra-individual comparative study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a novel topical solution containing tranexamic acid, adrenaline and bupivacaine versus standard paraffin-chlorhexidine dressings, with side allocation determined by computer randomisation after graft harvesting. Twelve patients received standardised solution application on one donor site and standard treatment on the contralateral site, with each side's dressing changes performed according to protocol. The treatment group demonstrated significantly lower mean pain scores across all time intervals (1.1 vs. 5.3 at 24 h, p < 0.001). Mean epithelialization rates at Days 10-14 were higher in the treatment group (97.1% vs. 94.8%, p < 0.05), with faster time to complete healing (median 12 vs. 16 days, p = 0.002). No significant hemodynamic changes occurred following solution application, with only one case of transient tachycardia reported. Vancouver Scar Scale scores at eight weeks showed a trend favouring the treatment (3.8 vs. 4.2, p = 0.15), although this difference was not statistically significant. No infections were observed in either group. These findings suggest that this novel topical solution with transparent film dressing effectively reduces pain and accelerates healing in donor site wounds without compromising safety, providing a promising new option for managing these challenging surgical wounds.</p>","PeriodicalId":23864,"journal":{"name":"Wound Repair and Regeneration","volume":"33 4","pages":"e70060"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wound Repair and Regeneration","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.70060","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Split-thickness skin graft donor site wounds present significant challenges in pain management and healing optimization. This intra-individual comparative study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a novel topical solution containing tranexamic acid, adrenaline and bupivacaine versus standard paraffin-chlorhexidine dressings, with side allocation determined by computer randomisation after graft harvesting. Twelve patients received standardised solution application on one donor site and standard treatment on the contralateral site, with each side's dressing changes performed according to protocol. The treatment group demonstrated significantly lower mean pain scores across all time intervals (1.1 vs. 5.3 at 24 h, p < 0.001). Mean epithelialization rates at Days 10-14 were higher in the treatment group (97.1% vs. 94.8%, p < 0.05), with faster time to complete healing (median 12 vs. 16 days, p = 0.002). No significant hemodynamic changes occurred following solution application, with only one case of transient tachycardia reported. Vancouver Scar Scale scores at eight weeks showed a trend favouring the treatment (3.8 vs. 4.2, p = 0.15), although this difference was not statistically significant. No infections were observed in either group. These findings suggest that this novel topical solution with transparent film dressing effectively reduces pain and accelerates healing in donor site wounds without compromising safety, providing a promising new option for managing these challenging surgical wounds.
期刊介绍:
Wound Repair and Regeneration provides extensive international coverage of cellular and molecular biology, connective tissue, and biological mediator studies in the field of tissue repair and regeneration and serves a diverse audience of surgeons, plastic surgeons, dermatologists, biochemists, cell biologists, and others.
Wound Repair and Regeneration is the official journal of The Wound Healing Society, The European Tissue Repair Society, The Japanese Society for Wound Healing, and The Australian Wound Management Association.