Protein Isolate Supplements and Urinary Stone Risk.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Daniel G Wong, Brad McNeely, Joel Vetter, Aleksandra Klim, Linda Black, Aaron Knutson, Kefu Du, Kristina Penniston, John Asplin, Alana Desai
{"title":"Protein Isolate Supplements and Urinary Stone Risk.","authors":"Daniel G Wong, Brad McNeely, Joel Vetter, Aleksandra Klim, Linda Black, Aaron Knutson, Kefu Du, Kristina Penniston, John Asplin, Alana Desai","doi":"10.1016/j.urology.2025.06.060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To characterize the lithogenicity associated with consuming specific protein sources, we report a comparative crossover study evaluating the effects of whey, pea, soy, and rice protein isolates on urinary stone risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Volunteers without history of stone disease were recruited for participation. Participants received a 5-day frozen meal plan which included three 20g protein shakes per day. Two 24-hour urine collections were completed on the last two days of each phase. The exact same diet was repeated for subsequent phases, exchanging only the protein isolate in the shake.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine participants - 8 male, 1 female - were enrolled with mean age of 24.8 ± 1.6 years and BMI of 22.3 ± 2.2 kg/m2. Urine calcium was significantly lower and pH was higher with pea and soy protein compared to whey protein consumption. Citrate excretion did not differ between any phases compared to whey protein. Urine oxalate was significantly higher in pea phase compared to whey. Supersaturation of calcium oxalate did not differ between any phases compared to whey.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We examined the short-term urinary effect of 4 protein isolates commonly used to supplement high protein diets and found key urinary metabolite differences. These differences were due to varying amino acid profiles but may also be related to differing constituents in each powder, such as cations and unmeasured anions.</p>","PeriodicalId":23415,"journal":{"name":"Urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2025.06.060","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To characterize the lithogenicity associated with consuming specific protein sources, we report a comparative crossover study evaluating the effects of whey, pea, soy, and rice protein isolates on urinary stone risk.

Methods: Volunteers without history of stone disease were recruited for participation. Participants received a 5-day frozen meal plan which included three 20g protein shakes per day. Two 24-hour urine collections were completed on the last two days of each phase. The exact same diet was repeated for subsequent phases, exchanging only the protein isolate in the shake.

Results: Nine participants - 8 male, 1 female - were enrolled with mean age of 24.8 ± 1.6 years and BMI of 22.3 ± 2.2 kg/m2. Urine calcium was significantly lower and pH was higher with pea and soy protein compared to whey protein consumption. Citrate excretion did not differ between any phases compared to whey protein. Urine oxalate was significantly higher in pea phase compared to whey. Supersaturation of calcium oxalate did not differ between any phases compared to whey.

Conclusion: We examined the short-term urinary effect of 4 protein isolates commonly used to supplement high protein diets and found key urinary metabolite differences. These differences were due to varying amino acid profiles but may also be related to differing constituents in each powder, such as cations and unmeasured anions.

分离蛋白补充剂与尿路结石风险
目的:为了描述与食用特定蛋白质来源相关的产石性,我们报告了一项比较交叉研究,评估乳清、豌豆、大豆和大米分离蛋白对尿路结石风险的影响。方法:招募无结石病史的志愿者参与。参与者接受了为期5天的冷冻膳食计划,其中包括每天三次20克蛋白质奶昔。在每个阶段的最后两天完成两次24小时尿液收集。同样的饮食在随后的阶段重复,只交换奶昔中的分离蛋白。结果:9名参与者,男8名,女1名,平均年龄24.8±1.6岁,BMI为22.3±2.2 kg/m2。与乳清蛋白相比,食用豌豆蛋白和大豆蛋白的尿钙显著降低,pH值显著升高。与乳清蛋白相比,柠檬酸盐的排泄在任何阶段都没有差异。豌豆期尿草酸显著高于乳清期。与乳清相比,草酸钙的过饱和在任何相之间都没有区别。结论:我们检测了4种常用的高蛋白膳食补充蛋白的短期尿效,发现了关键的尿代谢差异。这些差异是由于不同的氨基酸谱造成的,但也可能与每种粉末中的不同成分有关,例如阳离子和未测量的阴离子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urology
Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: Urology is a monthly, peer–reviewed journal primarily for urologists, residents, interns, nephrologists, and other specialists interested in urology The mission of Urology®, the "Gold Journal," is to provide practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science information to physicians and researchers practicing the art of urology worldwide. Urology® publishes original articles relating to adult and pediatric clinical urology as well as to clinical and basic science research. Topics in Urology® include pediatrics, surgical oncology, radiology, pathology, erectile dysfunction, infertility, incontinence, transplantation, endourology, andrology, female urology, reconstructive surgery, and medical oncology, as well as relevant basic science issues. Special features include rapid communication of important timely issues, surgeon''s workshops, interesting case reports, surgical techniques, clinical and basic science review articles, guest editorials, letters to the editor, book reviews, and historical articles in urology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信