Bradley J Gardiner, Roy F Chemaly, Vladyslav Nikolayevskyy, Riccardo Alagna, Davide Manissero, Camille N Kotton
{"title":"Use of the QuantiFERON Monitor Assay to Predict Clinical Outcomes in Solid Organ and Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Bradley J Gardiner, Roy F Chemaly, Vladyslav Nikolayevskyy, Riccardo Alagna, Davide Manissero, Camille N Kotton","doi":"10.1111/tid.70074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>QuantiFERON Monitor (QFM) is an interferon-gamma release assay designed to provide a global measure of innate and adaptive cell-mediated immune function. We performed a scoping review to explore published evidence on the ability of QFM to predict clinical outcomes in solid organ transplant (SOT) and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was conducted using Embase, Cochrane, and PubMed databases and included studies reporting QFM values and the incidence of infection and/or organ rejection or graft-versus-host disease (GvHD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen publications (9 SOT, 4 HCT) were included. Among SOT studies, infection (n = 8), rejection (n = 3), mortality (n = 2), and immunosuppression regimens (n = 7) were assessed as outcomes; low QFM values were associated with increased infection risk in 7/8 studies. Correlations were also identified between immunosuppression regimens and QFM results in 6/7 studies. No clear relationships between QFM values and rejection or mortality could be determined, possibly due to the low number of events reported. Infection (n = 4), GvHD (n = 3), and mortality (n = 1) were assessed in the HCT studies, with 3/4 reporting an association between low QFM values and infection. There was a high degree of heterogeneity in the transplant populations, outcome measures and definitions, QFM thresholds, and timing of sample collection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The available data suggest that QFM may be able to identify overly immunosuppressed individuals at higher risk of infection; additional studies are needed to further evaluate its predictive utility in transplant and other settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":23318,"journal":{"name":"Transplant Infectious Disease","volume":" ","pages":"e70074"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12416346/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplant Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.70074","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: QuantiFERON Monitor (QFM) is an interferon-gamma release assay designed to provide a global measure of innate and adaptive cell-mediated immune function. We performed a scoping review to explore published evidence on the ability of QFM to predict clinical outcomes in solid organ transplant (SOT) and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients.
Methods: A literature search was conducted using Embase, Cochrane, and PubMed databases and included studies reporting QFM values and the incidence of infection and/or organ rejection or graft-versus-host disease (GvHD).
Results: Thirteen publications (9 SOT, 4 HCT) were included. Among SOT studies, infection (n = 8), rejection (n = 3), mortality (n = 2), and immunosuppression regimens (n = 7) were assessed as outcomes; low QFM values were associated with increased infection risk in 7/8 studies. Correlations were also identified between immunosuppression regimens and QFM results in 6/7 studies. No clear relationships between QFM values and rejection or mortality could be determined, possibly due to the low number of events reported. Infection (n = 4), GvHD (n = 3), and mortality (n = 1) were assessed in the HCT studies, with 3/4 reporting an association between low QFM values and infection. There was a high degree of heterogeneity in the transplant populations, outcome measures and definitions, QFM thresholds, and timing of sample collection.
Conclusions: The available data suggest that QFM may be able to identify overly immunosuppressed individuals at higher risk of infection; additional studies are needed to further evaluate its predictive utility in transplant and other settings.
期刊介绍:
Transplant Infectious Disease has been established as a forum for presenting the most current information on the prevention and treatment of infection complicating organ and bone marrow transplantation. The point of view of the journal is that infection and allograft rejection (or graft-versus-host disease) are closely intertwined, and that advances in one area will have immediate consequences on the other. The interaction of the transplant recipient with potential microbial invaders, the impact of immunosuppressive strategies on this interaction, and the effects of cytokines, growth factors, and chemokines liberated during the course of infections, rejection, or graft-versus-host disease are central to the interests and mission of this journal.
Transplant Infectious Disease is aimed at disseminating the latest information relevant to the infectious disease complications of transplantation to clinicians and scientists involved in bone marrow, kidney, liver, heart, lung, intestinal, and pancreatic transplantation. The infectious disease consequences and concerns regarding innovative transplant strategies, from novel immunosuppressive agents to xenotransplantation, are very much a concern of this journal. In addition, this journal feels a particular responsibility to inform primary care practitioners in the community, who increasingly are sharing the responsibility for the care of these patients, of the special considerations regarding the prevention and treatment of infection in transplant recipients. As exemplified by the international editorial board, articles are sought throughout the world that address both general issues and those of a more restricted geographic import.