{"title":"E-leadership drives employee creativity through emotional exhaustion with regulatory focus as a moderator.","authors":"Liang Zhao, Hao Chen, Yichao Sun, Maya Luo, Peng Gao","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-05131-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the digital age, e-leadership has emerged as a critical driver of employee creativity, yet the underlying mechanisms and boundary conditions remain underexplored. This study aimed to elucidate the relationship between E-leadership and employee creativity by examining the mediating role of emotional exhaustion and the moderating influences of promotion and prevention regulatory foci. Data were collected via a questionnaire survey administered to 366 employees within China's Information and Communication Technology (ICT) sector, and the data were analyzed using hierarchical regression and bootstrapping techniques. Results demonstrate that E-leadership influences creativity through multiple concurrent pathways: a direct positive effect (β = 0.28, p 0.01, accounting for 66.7% of total effect) and an indirect effect mediated through reduced emotional exhaustion (β = 0.14, 95% CI [0.08, 0.21], representing 33.3% of total effect). These relationships are significantly moderated by regulatory focus, with promotion focus attenuating the negative association between E-leadership and emotional exhaustion (interaction β = 0.14, p = 0.01) and prevention focus exacerbating the detrimental impact of emotional exhaustion on creativity (interaction β = -0.20, p 0.01). These findings advance leadership theory by revealing how cognitive-motivational factors shape e-leadership effectiveness, with practical implications for mitigating burnout in technology-mediated work environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"22814"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-05131-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In the digital age, e-leadership has emerged as a critical driver of employee creativity, yet the underlying mechanisms and boundary conditions remain underexplored. This study aimed to elucidate the relationship between E-leadership and employee creativity by examining the mediating role of emotional exhaustion and the moderating influences of promotion and prevention regulatory foci. Data were collected via a questionnaire survey administered to 366 employees within China's Information and Communication Technology (ICT) sector, and the data were analyzed using hierarchical regression and bootstrapping techniques. Results demonstrate that E-leadership influences creativity through multiple concurrent pathways: a direct positive effect (β = 0.28, p 0.01, accounting for 66.7% of total effect) and an indirect effect mediated through reduced emotional exhaustion (β = 0.14, 95% CI [0.08, 0.21], representing 33.3% of total effect). These relationships are significantly moderated by regulatory focus, with promotion focus attenuating the negative association between E-leadership and emotional exhaustion (interaction β = 0.14, p = 0.01) and prevention focus exacerbating the detrimental impact of emotional exhaustion on creativity (interaction β = -0.20, p 0.01). These findings advance leadership theory by revealing how cognitive-motivational factors shape e-leadership effectiveness, with practical implications for mitigating burnout in technology-mediated work environments.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.