Kibeom Kwon, Minkyu Kang, Young Jin Shin, Byoungcheol Ahn, Hangseok Choi
{"title":"An interpretable framework for risk management in TBM excavation using expert elicitation integrated with fuzzy set theory.","authors":"Kibeom Kwon, Minkyu Kang, Young Jin Shin, Byoungcheol Ahn, Hangseok Choi","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-07514-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Risk management is essential for optimal decision-making during tunnel boring machine (TBM) excavation. Previous methods, however, have struggled with interpreting the uncertainties associated with TBM excavation and managing multiple concurrent adverse factors. This study proposes an interpretable risk management method that effectively addresses these uncertainties and concurrent sources. It employs an expert elicitation framework combined with fuzzy set theory to distribute the confidence levels of experts' evaluations across multiple classes. The resulting impact, probability, and risk are presented as distributions, allowing for a comprehensive interpretation of expert judgment trends, which reveals how uncertainties are distributed and identifies any dominant class or risk level. The proposed method was applied to a slurry shield TBM tunnel project, where most distributions showed no single dominant class or risk level due to significant uncertainties, emphasizing the need for comprehensive interpretation. Furthermore, the method effectively addressed increased probabilities and risks stemming from concurrent factors, in contrast to when these factors were considered individually. Comparative analysis demonstrated that even meaningful but minor responses can significantly influence the determination of risk levels through comprehensive interpretation.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"23030"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12215182/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-07514-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Risk management is essential for optimal decision-making during tunnel boring machine (TBM) excavation. Previous methods, however, have struggled with interpreting the uncertainties associated with TBM excavation and managing multiple concurrent adverse factors. This study proposes an interpretable risk management method that effectively addresses these uncertainties and concurrent sources. It employs an expert elicitation framework combined with fuzzy set theory to distribute the confidence levels of experts' evaluations across multiple classes. The resulting impact, probability, and risk are presented as distributions, allowing for a comprehensive interpretation of expert judgment trends, which reveals how uncertainties are distributed and identifies any dominant class or risk level. The proposed method was applied to a slurry shield TBM tunnel project, where most distributions showed no single dominant class or risk level due to significant uncertainties, emphasizing the need for comprehensive interpretation. Furthermore, the method effectively addressed increased probabilities and risks stemming from concurrent factors, in contrast to when these factors were considered individually. Comparative analysis demonstrated that even meaningful but minor responses can significantly influence the determination of risk levels through comprehensive interpretation.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.