Cognitive subtypes in youth at clinical high risk for psychosis.

IF 5 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Walid Yassin, James B Green, Matcheri Keshavan, Elisabetta C Del Re, Jean Addington, Carrie E Bearden, Kristin S Cadenhead, Tyrone D Cannon, Barbara A Cornblatt, Daniel H Mathalon, Diana O Perkins, Elaine F Walker, Scott W Woods, William S Stone
{"title":"Cognitive subtypes in youth at clinical high risk for psychosis.","authors":"Walid Yassin, James B Green, Matcheri Keshavan, Elisabetta C Del Re, Jean Addington, Carrie E Bearden, Kristin S Cadenhead, Tyrone D Cannon, Barbara A Cornblatt, Daniel H Mathalon, Diana O Perkins, Elaine F Walker, Scott W Woods, William S Stone","doi":"10.1111/pcn.13861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to identify and characterize cognitive subtypes among youth at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cluster analysis on cognitive measures in a large sample of CHR patients (CHR; n = 764) and healthy controls (HCs; n = 280) from NAPLS-2 (North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study 2). These findings were independently validated using a comparably large sample from NAPLS-3 (n = 628 CHR, 84 HCs). Statistical approaches were employed to compare cognitive, clinical, and functional trajectories at baseline and during 24 months of follow-up, with further analysis of conversion status within these clusters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two cognitive clusters, \"impaired\" and \"intact,\" were identified in the CHR group. Baseline differences in verbal abilities and attention and working memory domains distinguished the cognitively intact cluster from HCs. Longitudinally, the impaired group displayed a 'floor' effect, with no noticeable deterioration, but showed a \"catch-up\" trajectory in attention and working memory. This group had a higher conversion rate and more cases diagnosed with psychotic disorders than the intact group. In the intact group, converters exhibited a decline in attention and functioning. Most cognitive trajectories showed a positive relationship with functional outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study provides evidence for distinct cognitive subtypes in CHR, independent of conversion status. Early evaluation across cognitive domains is crucial for identifying trajectories to tailor interventions that aim to enhance outcomes for individuals at CHR for psychosis. Future research should focus on longer follow-up trajectories targeting attention and working memory and explore related intervention strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":20938,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pcn.13861","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: This study aimed to identify and characterize cognitive subtypes among youth at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis.

Methods: We conducted a cluster analysis on cognitive measures in a large sample of CHR patients (CHR; n = 764) and healthy controls (HCs; n = 280) from NAPLS-2 (North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study 2). These findings were independently validated using a comparably large sample from NAPLS-3 (n = 628 CHR, 84 HCs). Statistical approaches were employed to compare cognitive, clinical, and functional trajectories at baseline and during 24 months of follow-up, with further analysis of conversion status within these clusters.

Results: Two cognitive clusters, "impaired" and "intact," were identified in the CHR group. Baseline differences in verbal abilities and attention and working memory domains distinguished the cognitively intact cluster from HCs. Longitudinally, the impaired group displayed a 'floor' effect, with no noticeable deterioration, but showed a "catch-up" trajectory in attention and working memory. This group had a higher conversion rate and more cases diagnosed with psychotic disorders than the intact group. In the intact group, converters exhibited a decline in attention and functioning. Most cognitive trajectories showed a positive relationship with functional outcomes.

Conclusions: The study provides evidence for distinct cognitive subtypes in CHR, independent of conversion status. Early evaluation across cognitive domains is crucial for identifying trajectories to tailor interventions that aim to enhance outcomes for individuals at CHR for psychosis. Future research should focus on longer follow-up trajectories targeting attention and working memory and explore related intervention strategies.

临床精神病高危青年的认知亚型。
目的:本研究旨在识别和表征精神病临床高危(CHR)青年的认知亚型。方法:我们对大样本CHR患者(CHR;n = 764)和健康对照(hc;n = 280),来自NAPLS-2(北美前驱期纵向研究2)。这些发现通过来自NAPLS-3的相当大的样本(n = 628 CHR, 84 hc)独立验证。采用统计学方法比较基线和24个月随访期间的认知、临床和功能轨迹,并进一步分析这些集群内的转换状态。结果:在CHR组中发现了“受损”和“完整”两种认知集群。语言能力、注意力和工作记忆领域的基线差异将认知完整的群集与hc区分开来。纵向上,受损组表现出“最低”效应,没有明显的退化,但在注意力和工作记忆方面表现出“追赶”的轨迹。与正常组相比,这一组有更高的转换率和更多被诊断为精神障碍的病例。在完整组中,转换者表现出注意力和功能的下降。大多数认知轨迹显示与功能结果呈正相关。结论:该研究为CHR的不同认知亚型提供了证据,这些亚型独立于转换状态。跨认知领域的早期评估对于确定轨迹来定制干预措施是至关重要的,这些干预措施旨在提高CHR精神病患者的预后。未来的研究应关注以注意力和工作记忆为目标的更长的随访轨迹,并探索相关的干预策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
181
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: PCN (Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences) Publication Frequency: Published 12 online issues a year by JSPN Content Categories: Review Articles Regular Articles Letters to the Editor Peer Review Process: All manuscripts undergo peer review by anonymous reviewers, an Editorial Board Member, and the Editor Publication Criteria: Manuscripts are accepted based on quality, originality, and significance to the readership Authors must confirm that the manuscript has not been published or submitted elsewhere and has been approved by each author
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信