Increased access to pediatric specialist healthcare using eConsult: A retrospective observational cohort and case-control study.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Paediatrics & child health Pub Date : 2024-10-08 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1093/pch/pxae047
Lillian Lai, Sophia Roubos, Dhenuka Radhakrishnan, Eric I Benchimol, Xuesong Wang, Lavina Matai, Erin Keely, Clare Liddy, Kimmo Murto
{"title":"Increased access to pediatric specialist healthcare using eConsult: A retrospective observational cohort and case-control study.","authors":"Lillian Lai, Sophia Roubos, Dhenuka Radhakrishnan, Eric I Benchimol, Xuesong Wang, Lavina Matai, Erin Keely, Clare Liddy, Kimmo Murto","doi":"10.1093/pch/pxae047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Primary care practitioners (PCPs) report that using the Champlain BASE™ eConsult service (eConsult) averts one-third of face-to-face (FTF) specialist referrals, however, there are concerns about duplication of services and adverse patient outcomes. Following an eConsult, we evaluated patient healthcare utilization and associated treatment costs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort study (2014 to 2018) of patients (<18 years old) for whom an eConsult visit averted a FTF specialist referral. Patients were linked to provincial health administrative databases and hospital electronic medical records for healthcare use for the same diagnosis and specialty for the 18 months following the eConsult. Concurrently, a retrospective case-control study compared utilization and costs between an eConsult versus a matched FTF visit for the same diagnosis. We also assessed PCP satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In follow-up, <5% of the study cohort of eConsult patients (n = 242) later accessed the healthcare system for the identical diagnosis and specialty type. FTF visits generate more frequent outpatient visits (12.6 times more [95% CI: 2.28 to 69.66, P = 0.002]) and higher costs compared to eConsult visits. There were no hospital admissions or deaths in patients with eConsult. PCPs (98%) described eConsult as an excellent service.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using eConsult is associated with <5% of patients subsequently having a FTF visit for the same reason. Matched FTF visits generated more healthcare utilization and higher costs compared with eConsult. eConsult in pediatrics is safe and can minimize FTF specialist visits in elective cases and increase capacity, towards a more efficient and cost-effective healthcare system.</p>","PeriodicalId":19730,"journal":{"name":"Paediatrics & child health","volume":"30 3","pages":"108-115"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12208371/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paediatrics & child health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pch/pxae047","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Primary care practitioners (PCPs) report that using the Champlain BASE™ eConsult service (eConsult) averts one-third of face-to-face (FTF) specialist referrals, however, there are concerns about duplication of services and adverse patient outcomes. Following an eConsult, we evaluated patient healthcare utilization and associated treatment costs.

Methods: Retrospective cohort study (2014 to 2018) of patients (<18 years old) for whom an eConsult visit averted a FTF specialist referral. Patients were linked to provincial health administrative databases and hospital electronic medical records for healthcare use for the same diagnosis and specialty for the 18 months following the eConsult. Concurrently, a retrospective case-control study compared utilization and costs between an eConsult versus a matched FTF visit for the same diagnosis. We also assessed PCP satisfaction.

Results: In follow-up, <5% of the study cohort of eConsult patients (n = 242) later accessed the healthcare system for the identical diagnosis and specialty type. FTF visits generate more frequent outpatient visits (12.6 times more [95% CI: 2.28 to 69.66, P = 0.002]) and higher costs compared to eConsult visits. There were no hospital admissions or deaths in patients with eConsult. PCPs (98%) described eConsult as an excellent service.

Conclusions: Using eConsult is associated with <5% of patients subsequently having a FTF visit for the same reason. Matched FTF visits generated more healthcare utilization and higher costs compared with eConsult. eConsult in pediatrics is safe and can minimize FTF specialist visits in elective cases and increase capacity, towards a more efficient and cost-effective healthcare system.

使用eConsult增加获得儿科专科医疗保健的机会:一项回顾性观察队列和病例对照研究。
目的:初级保健从业人员(pcp)报告说,使用Champlain BASE™咨询服务(eConsult)避免了三分之一的面对面(FTF)专家转诊,然而,存在重复服务和不良患者结果的担忧。在eConsult之后,我们评估了患者的医疗保健利用和相关的治疗费用。方法:回顾性队列研究(2014 - 2018)患者(结果:随访中,结论:使用eConsult与
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Paediatrics & child health
Paediatrics & child health 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
5.30%
发文量
208
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Paediatrics & Child Health (PCH) is the official journal of the Canadian Paediatric Society, and the only peer-reviewed paediatric journal in Canada. Its mission is to advocate for the health and well-being of all Canadian children and youth and to educate child and youth health professionals across the country. PCH reaches 8,000 paediatricians, family physicians and other child and youth health professionals, as well as ministers and officials in various levels of government who are involved with child and youth health policy in Canada.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信