Facial Asymmetry Phenotypes in Adult Patients With Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate and Skeletal Class III Malocclusion Using Principal Component Analysis and Cluster Analysis.
Mihee Hong, Su-Ji Yoon, Il-Hyung Yang, Jin-Young Choi, Jong-Ho Lee, Myung-Jin Kim, Jee Hyeok Chung, Sukwha Kim, Seung-Hak Baek
{"title":"Facial Asymmetry Phenotypes in Adult Patients With Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate and Skeletal Class III Malocclusion Using Principal Component Analysis and Cluster Analysis.","authors":"Mihee Hong, Su-Ji Yoon, Il-Hyung Yang, Jin-Young Choi, Jong-Ho Lee, Myung-Jin Kim, Jee Hyeok Chung, Sukwha Kim, Seung-Hak Baek","doi":"10.1111/ocr.70003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To classify and characterise facial asymmetry (FA) phenotypes in adult patients with bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) and skeletal Class III (C-III) malocclusion.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The samples consisted of 72 adult BCLP patients (56 males, 16 females; mean age, 21.0 years), who were candidates for orthognathic surgery (OGS) or had undergone OGS for the correction of C-III malocclusion. Because BCLP patients have two cleft sides, the vertically longer defect (VLD) side was used for the reference side. Twenty-three cephalometric parameters were measured in posteroanterior cephalograms taken at least 1month before OGS. Principal component analysis was performed to obtain seven representative parameters [ANS-deviation (mm), U1-deviation (mm), L1-deviation (mm), Me-deviation (mm), MaxAntOP-cant (°), MaxPostOP-cant (°), ManBorder-cant (°)]. K-means cluster analysis was conducted using these representative parameters. Differences in cephalometric parameters among the clusters were statistically analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>FA phenotypes were classified based on the deviation direction towards the VLD or less VLD side and the upward or downward cant in the VLD side. The classifications were: (1) Symmetry type (20.8%); (2) MxMn-VLD-dev & MxMn-no-cant type (22.2%); (3) MxMn-less-VLD-dev & Mnbase-VLD-down-cant type (9.7%); (4) Mn-less-VLD-dev & MxMn-VLD-down-cant type (20.8%); (5) MxMn-no-dev & MxMn-VLD-up-cant type (19.4%), and (6) MxMn-VLD-dev & MxMn-VLD-up-cant type (6.9%). The possible etiologies of FA phenotypes included ANS deviation, movement of the maxillary incisor by pre-operative orthodontic treatment, and adaptive growth or compensatory growth of the maxilla and/or mandible.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This FA phenotype classification could serve as a guideline for diagnosis and OGS planning for BCLP patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":19652,"journal":{"name":"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.70003","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To classify and characterise facial asymmetry (FA) phenotypes in adult patients with bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) and skeletal Class III (C-III) malocclusion.
Materials and methods: The samples consisted of 72 adult BCLP patients (56 males, 16 females; mean age, 21.0 years), who were candidates for orthognathic surgery (OGS) or had undergone OGS for the correction of C-III malocclusion. Because BCLP patients have two cleft sides, the vertically longer defect (VLD) side was used for the reference side. Twenty-three cephalometric parameters were measured in posteroanterior cephalograms taken at least 1month before OGS. Principal component analysis was performed to obtain seven representative parameters [ANS-deviation (mm), U1-deviation (mm), L1-deviation (mm), Me-deviation (mm), MaxAntOP-cant (°), MaxPostOP-cant (°), ManBorder-cant (°)]. K-means cluster analysis was conducted using these representative parameters. Differences in cephalometric parameters among the clusters were statistically analysed.
Results: FA phenotypes were classified based on the deviation direction towards the VLD or less VLD side and the upward or downward cant in the VLD side. The classifications were: (1) Symmetry type (20.8%); (2) MxMn-VLD-dev & MxMn-no-cant type (22.2%); (3) MxMn-less-VLD-dev & Mnbase-VLD-down-cant type (9.7%); (4) Mn-less-VLD-dev & MxMn-VLD-down-cant type (20.8%); (5) MxMn-no-dev & MxMn-VLD-up-cant type (19.4%), and (6) MxMn-VLD-dev & MxMn-VLD-up-cant type (6.9%). The possible etiologies of FA phenotypes included ANS deviation, movement of the maxillary incisor by pre-operative orthodontic treatment, and adaptive growth or compensatory growth of the maxilla and/or mandible.
Conclusion: This FA phenotype classification could serve as a guideline for diagnosis and OGS planning for BCLP patients.
期刊介绍:
Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research - Genes, Growth and Development is published to serve its readers as an international forum for the presentation and critical discussion of issues pertinent to the advancement of the specialty of orthodontics and the evidence-based knowledge of craniofacial growth and development. This forum is based on scientifically supported information, but also includes minority and conflicting opinions.
The objective of the journal is to facilitate effective communication between the research community and practicing clinicians. Original papers of high scientific quality that report the findings of clinical trials, clinical epidemiology, and novel therapeutic or diagnostic approaches are appropriate submissions. Similarly, we welcome papers in genetics, developmental biology, syndromology, surgery, speech and hearing, and other biomedical disciplines related to clinical orthodontics and normal and abnormal craniofacial growth and development. In addition to original and basic research, the journal publishes concise reviews, case reports of substantial value, invited essays, letters, and announcements.
The journal is published quarterly. The review of submitted papers will be coordinated by the editor and members of the editorial board. It is policy to review manuscripts within 3 to 4 weeks of receipt and to publish within 3 to 6 months of acceptance.