Impact of sodium bicarbonate locking solution on catheter-related blood stream infection in hemodialysis patients: comparative effectiveness of three locks.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Tamar Kasradze, Tamar Didbaridze, Irma Tchokhonelidze
{"title":"Impact of sodium bicarbonate locking solution on catheter-related blood stream infection in hemodialysis patients: comparative effectiveness of three locks.","authors":"Tamar Kasradze, Tamar Didbaridze, Irma Tchokhonelidze","doi":"10.1007/s40620-025-02315-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The primary challenge for hemodialysis (HD) patients using permanent tunneled cuffed catheters is to prevent catheter-related bloodstream infections. This study assessed the effectiveness of sodium bicarbonate in preventing catheter-related bloodstream infections and compared its efficacy to antibiotic-containing locks.</p><p><strong>Design, materials, and methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective single-center, open-label, cohort study over 30 months with the aim to compare three cohorts: cohort I employed 8.4% sodium bicarbonate solution lock, cohort II employed 0.5 mg/ml gentamicin/acid citrate dextrose solution lock, and cohort III employed unfractionated conventional heparin 5000 U/ml solution lock. The primary endpoint was the first episode of catheter-related bloodstream infection, while the secondary endpoint was catheter loss due to catheter-related bloodstream infection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study involved 204 HD patients with permanent tunneled cuffed central venous catheters (CVCs). A total of 58 cases of catheter-related bloodstream infection were documented. In the sodium bicarbonate-lock cohort, infection occurred in 17.24%, in the gentamicin/acid citrate-lock cohort in 36.21%, and in the heparin-lock cohort in 46.55%. Patients with sodium bicarbonate and gentamicin/acid citrate locks exhibited a statistically significant lower risk of developing infections (0.4/1000 catheter days and 0.7/1000 catheter days, respectively) compared to patients with heparin-lock (1.4/1000 catheter days). Patients with heparin lock faced a higher risk of losing a catheter due to infection compared to those with gentamicin/acid citrate lock and sodium bicarbonate-lock (Hazard Ratio (HR) = 1.26, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) [1.09-1.46], P = 0.001) and (HR = 1.10, 95% CI [1.01-1.19], P = 0.024).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The sodium bicarbonate locking solution demonstrated an infection-free catheter survival comparable to that of the gentamicin citrate solution and significantly decreased catheter-related bloodstream infection compared to heparin locks.</p>","PeriodicalId":16542,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-025-02315-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The primary challenge for hemodialysis (HD) patients using permanent tunneled cuffed catheters is to prevent catheter-related bloodstream infections. This study assessed the effectiveness of sodium bicarbonate in preventing catheter-related bloodstream infections and compared its efficacy to antibiotic-containing locks.

Design, materials, and methods: We conducted a prospective single-center, open-label, cohort study over 30 months with the aim to compare three cohorts: cohort I employed 8.4% sodium bicarbonate solution lock, cohort II employed 0.5 mg/ml gentamicin/acid citrate dextrose solution lock, and cohort III employed unfractionated conventional heparin 5000 U/ml solution lock. The primary endpoint was the first episode of catheter-related bloodstream infection, while the secondary endpoint was catheter loss due to catheter-related bloodstream infection.

Results: This study involved 204 HD patients with permanent tunneled cuffed central venous catheters (CVCs). A total of 58 cases of catheter-related bloodstream infection were documented. In the sodium bicarbonate-lock cohort, infection occurred in 17.24%, in the gentamicin/acid citrate-lock cohort in 36.21%, and in the heparin-lock cohort in 46.55%. Patients with sodium bicarbonate and gentamicin/acid citrate locks exhibited a statistically significant lower risk of developing infections (0.4/1000 catheter days and 0.7/1000 catheter days, respectively) compared to patients with heparin-lock (1.4/1000 catheter days). Patients with heparin lock faced a higher risk of losing a catheter due to infection compared to those with gentamicin/acid citrate lock and sodium bicarbonate-lock (Hazard Ratio (HR) = 1.26, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) [1.09-1.46], P = 0.001) and (HR = 1.10, 95% CI [1.01-1.19], P = 0.024).

Conclusion: The sodium bicarbonate locking solution demonstrated an infection-free catheter survival comparable to that of the gentamicin citrate solution and significantly decreased catheter-related bloodstream infection compared to heparin locks.

碳酸氢钠锁固液对血液透析患者导管相关血流感染的影响:三种锁固的比较效果。
背景:血液透析(HD)患者使用永久性隧道套管导管的主要挑战是预防导管相关血流感染。本研究评估了碳酸氢钠预防导管相关血流感染的有效性,并将其与含抗生素锁的有效性进行了比较。设计、材料和方法:我们进行了一项为期30个月的前瞻性单中心、开放标签、队列研究,目的是比较三个队列:队列I采用8.4%碳酸氢钠溶液锁,队列II采用0.5 mg/ml庆大霉素/柠檬酸葡萄糖溶液锁,队列III采用未分离的常规肝素5000 U/ml溶液锁。主要终点是导管相关血流感染的首次发作,次要终点是导管相关血流感染导致的导管丢失。结果:本研究纳入了204例使用永久性隧道套管中心静脉导管(CVCs)的HD患者。共记录了58例导管相关血流感染。在碳酸氢钠锁组中,感染发生率为17.24%,庆大霉素/柠檬酸锁组为36.21%,肝素锁组为46.55%。与肝素锁药组(1.4/1000导管天)相比,碳酸氢钠和庆大霉素/柠檬酸锁药组患者发生感染的风险(分别为0.4/1000导管天和0.7/1000导管天)具有统计学意义。与庆大霉素/柠檬酸锁管和碳酸氢钠锁管患者相比,肝素锁管患者因感染丢失导管的风险更高(风险比(HR) = 1.26, 95%可信区间(CI) [1.09-1.46], P = 0.001)和(HR = 1.10, 95% CI [1.01-1.19], P = 0.024)。结论:碳酸氢钠锁栓溶液与柠檬酸庆大霉素溶液相比具有无感染的导管生存期,与肝素锁栓相比可显著降低导管相关血流感染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Nephrology
Journal of Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
289
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Nephrology is a bimonthly journal that considers publication of peer reviewed original manuscripts dealing with both clinical and laboratory investigations of relevance to the broad fields of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation. It is the Official Journal of the Italian Society of Nephrology (SIN).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信