Access to pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a geospatial analysis of the racial/ethnic composition of areas with and without access.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Zoel A Quiñónez, Kathleen Ryan, Tristan D Margetson, Elisabeth Grosvenor, Charlotte D Smith, Laura M Diaz, Angel Benitez-Melo, Seth Hollander, Danton Char
{"title":"Access to pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a geospatial analysis of the racial/ethnic composition of areas with and without access.","authors":"Zoel A Quiñónez, Kathleen Ryan, Tristan D Margetson, Elisabeth Grosvenor, Charlotte D Smith, Laura M Diaz, Angel Benitez-Melo, Seth Hollander, Danton Char","doi":"10.1186/s12939-025-02571-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We propose that all communities should have access to lifesaving technologies like pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), and that distance is one actionable component to accessibility. We chose to examine whether geographic access by distance to pediatric ECMO differs by race/ethnicity for populations historically excluded from health services and technologies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Population data was obtained from the US Census Bureau's American Community Survey. Pediatric ECMO program data was obtained from the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry. We compared the proportion of individuals that are American Indian/Alaska Native, Black/African American, Hispanic/Latina(o), or White that live within and outside of a 200-mile distance from pediatric ECMO programs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>43% of the total US land area falls outside of the US catchment area for pediatric ECMO; and 4.91% of the US population (or 16,433,563 persons) does not have access to a Pediatric ECMO center. One of every four individuals that identify as American Indian/Native American, one of every 100 who identify as Black/African American, one of every 12 that identify as Hispanic/Latina(o), and one of every 21 that identify as White live outside of the pediatric ECMO catchment area for the United States.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>American Indian/Native Americans and Hispanic/Latina(o)s lack access to pediatric ECMO by proximity. While Black/African Americans live close to ECMO programs, previous studies show that this population has less access to primary and specialized care. Distance is one actionable measurement that should be used to extend access to medical technologies for populations that have historically been excluded.</p>","PeriodicalId":13745,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Equity in Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"187"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12211372/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Equity in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-025-02571-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We propose that all communities should have access to lifesaving technologies like pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), and that distance is one actionable component to accessibility. We chose to examine whether geographic access by distance to pediatric ECMO differs by race/ethnicity for populations historically excluded from health services and technologies.

Methods: Population data was obtained from the US Census Bureau's American Community Survey. Pediatric ECMO program data was obtained from the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry. We compared the proportion of individuals that are American Indian/Alaska Native, Black/African American, Hispanic/Latina(o), or White that live within and outside of a 200-mile distance from pediatric ECMO programs.

Results: 43% of the total US land area falls outside of the US catchment area for pediatric ECMO; and 4.91% of the US population (or 16,433,563 persons) does not have access to a Pediatric ECMO center. One of every four individuals that identify as American Indian/Native American, one of every 100 who identify as Black/African American, one of every 12 that identify as Hispanic/Latina(o), and one of every 21 that identify as White live outside of the pediatric ECMO catchment area for the United States.

Conclusions: American Indian/Native Americans and Hispanic/Latina(o)s lack access to pediatric ECMO by proximity. While Black/African Americans live close to ECMO programs, previous studies show that this population has less access to primary and specialized care. Distance is one actionable measurement that should be used to extend access to medical technologies for populations that have historically been excluded.

Abstract Image

获得儿科体外膜氧合:有和没有获得的地区的种族/民族组成的地理空间分析。
背景:我们建议所有社区都应该有机会获得救生技术,如儿科体外膜氧合(ECMO),距离是可及性的一个可操作的组成部分。我们选择考察在历史上被排除在卫生服务和技术之外的人群中,地理距离上获得儿科ECMO的机会是否因种族/民族而异。方法:人口数据来自美国人口普查局的美国社区调查。儿科ECMO项目数据来自体外生命支持组织注册表。我们比较了美国印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民、黑人/非裔美国人、西班牙裔/拉丁裔(0)或居住在距儿科ECMO项目200英里以内和以外的白人的比例。结果:43%的美国土地面积不在美国儿科ECMO的覆盖范围内;4.91%的美国人口(或16,433,563人)无法进入儿科ECMO中心。四分之一的美国印第安人/美洲原住民,一百分之一的黑人/非裔美国人,十二分之一的西班牙裔/拉丁裔(0),二十一分之一的白人居住在美国儿科ECMO集水区之外。结论:美国印第安人/土著美国人和西班牙裔/拉丁裔(o)缺乏就近获得儿科ECMO的机会。虽然黑人/非裔美国人生活在ECMO项目附近,但先前的研究表明,这一人群获得初级和专业护理的机会较少。距离是一种可行的衡量标准,应该用来扩大历史上被排除在外的人群获得医疗技术的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
162
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal for Equity in Health is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal presenting evidence relevant to the search for, and attainment of, equity in health across and within countries. International Journal for Equity in Health aims to improve the understanding of issues that influence the health of populations. This includes the discussion of political, policy-related, economic, social and health services-related influences, particularly with regard to systematic differences in distributions of one or more aspects of health in population groups defined demographically, geographically, or socially.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信