Xolani B Mbongozi, Stuart D R Galloway, Angus Hunter, Mirabel Nanjoh, Charles B Businge
{"title":"Elevated central blood pressure, NT-proBNP and hs-cTnI in women with maternal complications of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.","authors":"Xolani B Mbongozi, Stuart D R Galloway, Angus Hunter, Mirabel Nanjoh, Charles B Businge","doi":"10.1080/10641955.2025.2524324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The main objective of the study was to compare the levels of CBP and these cardiac biomarkers in women with maternal complications of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional study that enrolled 270 women with HDP and 270 normotensive pregnant controls. Data on basic characteristics and incidence of maternal complications were collected among the two groups. Additionally, information on cardiac biomarkers and CBP was gathered from the women with HDP, to compare the levels of these biomarkers with maternal complications experience by this group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Non-hypertensive controls were significantly older than hypertensive cases and had a higher median gestational age at recruitment compared to hypertensive cases The median levels of CBP and cardiac biomarkers were significantly higher among hypertensive participants with maternal complications (<i>n</i> = 107/270) than those without complications (<i>n</i> = 163/270). Specifically, central systolic blood pressure (CSBP) was 133 (120-142) mmHg vs 128 (109-129) mmHg (<i>p</i> = 0.033) and central diastolic blood pressure (CDBP) was 75 (62-86) mmHg vs 69 (56-73) mmHg (<i>p</i> < 0.01), while NT-proBNP was 446 (145-1126) vs. 57 (21-167)) pg.ml<sup>-1</sup>; <i>p</i> < 0.0001, and hs-cTnI was 12 (7-35) ng.L<sup>-1</sup> compared to 8 (3-8) ng.L<sup>-1</sup>; <i>p</i> < 0.0001, in cases v. controls, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, the study found that pregnant hypertensive women with maternal complications had significantly higher median values of CSBP and CDBP, NT-proBNP, and hs-cTnI in compared to those without complications. These findings suggest that measuring these vital signs and cardiac biomarkers in hypertensive pregnancies might be helpful for screening and monitoring maternal complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":13054,"journal":{"name":"Hypertension in Pregnancy","volume":"44 1","pages":"2524324"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hypertension in Pregnancy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10641955.2025.2524324","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The main objective of the study was to compare the levels of CBP and these cardiac biomarkers in women with maternal complications of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP).
Methods: This was a cross-sectional study that enrolled 270 women with HDP and 270 normotensive pregnant controls. Data on basic characteristics and incidence of maternal complications were collected among the two groups. Additionally, information on cardiac biomarkers and CBP was gathered from the women with HDP, to compare the levels of these biomarkers with maternal complications experience by this group.
Results: Non-hypertensive controls were significantly older than hypertensive cases and had a higher median gestational age at recruitment compared to hypertensive cases The median levels of CBP and cardiac biomarkers were significantly higher among hypertensive participants with maternal complications (n = 107/270) than those without complications (n = 163/270). Specifically, central systolic blood pressure (CSBP) was 133 (120-142) mmHg vs 128 (109-129) mmHg (p = 0.033) and central diastolic blood pressure (CDBP) was 75 (62-86) mmHg vs 69 (56-73) mmHg (p < 0.01), while NT-proBNP was 446 (145-1126) vs. 57 (21-167)) pg.ml-1; p < 0.0001, and hs-cTnI was 12 (7-35) ng.L-1 compared to 8 (3-8) ng.L-1; p < 0.0001, in cases v. controls, respectively.
Conclusion: In conclusion, the study found that pregnant hypertensive women with maternal complications had significantly higher median values of CSBP and CDBP, NT-proBNP, and hs-cTnI in compared to those without complications. These findings suggest that measuring these vital signs and cardiac biomarkers in hypertensive pregnancies might be helpful for screening and monitoring maternal complications.
期刊介绍:
Hypertension in Pregnancy is a refereed journal in the English language which publishes data pertaining to human and animal hypertension during gestation. Contributions concerning physiology of circulatory control, pathophysiology, methodology, therapy or any other material relevant to the relationship between elevated blood pressure and pregnancy are acceptable. Published material includes original articles, clinical trials, solicited and unsolicited reviews, editorials, letters, and other material deemed pertinent by the editors.