"Automatic" online reach corrections are associated with individual differences in executive function.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Branden T Otte, Christopher L Striemer
{"title":"\"Automatic\" online reach corrections are associated with individual differences in executive function.","authors":"Branden T Otte, Christopher L Striemer","doi":"10.1007/s00221-025-07126-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous research has demonstrated that the dorsal visual stream is able to execute rapid online movement corrections to sudden changes in target position. This \"automatic pilot\" can operate in the absence of visual awareness, and even under circumstances where participants are instructed to not correct their movements. In the current study, we examined the extent to which these \"automatic\" corrections might be related to individual differences in executive function. To examine this, healthy adult participants (n = 80) completed two versions of the automatic pilot task on a touch screen: (1) a \"Correct\" condition in which participants were instructed to correct their movement to the new target location on jump trials, and (2) an \"Ignore\" condition in which participants were told to ignore any target jumps, and point to the initial target location. In addition to completing these two versions of the automatic pilot task, participants also completed the Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART), in which they were asked to respond when a number was presented, except for the number 3. Finally, participants completed self-report questionnaires indexing executive attention, impulsivity, and executive function including the Adult ADHD Self Report Scale (ASRS), the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ), and the Behavioural Rating Inventory of Executive Function for Adults (BRIEF-A).Our results indicated that, similar to previous research, participants made significantly more corrections to target jumps in the \"Correct\" condition, compared to the \"Ignore\" condition. Importantly, \"automatic\" unintended corrections in the \"Ignore\" condition were significantly correlated with poorer scores on the ASRS, the CFQ and the BRIEF-A. However, unintended corrections were not correlated with errors or reaction times on the SART. These results suggest that the automatic pilot task is sensitive to self-reported individual differences in executive function, and may be useful as a visuomotor measure of response inhibition and cognitive control in both healthy and clinical populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12268,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Brain Research","volume":"243 7","pages":"182"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-025-07126-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous research has demonstrated that the dorsal visual stream is able to execute rapid online movement corrections to sudden changes in target position. This "automatic pilot" can operate in the absence of visual awareness, and even under circumstances where participants are instructed to not correct their movements. In the current study, we examined the extent to which these "automatic" corrections might be related to individual differences in executive function. To examine this, healthy adult participants (n = 80) completed two versions of the automatic pilot task on a touch screen: (1) a "Correct" condition in which participants were instructed to correct their movement to the new target location on jump trials, and (2) an "Ignore" condition in which participants were told to ignore any target jumps, and point to the initial target location. In addition to completing these two versions of the automatic pilot task, participants also completed the Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART), in which they were asked to respond when a number was presented, except for the number 3. Finally, participants completed self-report questionnaires indexing executive attention, impulsivity, and executive function including the Adult ADHD Self Report Scale (ASRS), the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ), and the Behavioural Rating Inventory of Executive Function for Adults (BRIEF-A).Our results indicated that, similar to previous research, participants made significantly more corrections to target jumps in the "Correct" condition, compared to the "Ignore" condition. Importantly, "automatic" unintended corrections in the "Ignore" condition were significantly correlated with poorer scores on the ASRS, the CFQ and the BRIEF-A. However, unintended corrections were not correlated with errors or reaction times on the SART. These results suggest that the automatic pilot task is sensitive to self-reported individual differences in executive function, and may be useful as a visuomotor measure of response inhibition and cognitive control in both healthy and clinical populations.

“自动”在线到达更正与执行功能的个体差异有关。
先前的研究表明,背侧视觉流能够对目标位置的突然变化进行快速的在线运动修正。这个“自动驾驶员”可以在没有视觉意识的情况下运行,甚至在参与者被指示不纠正动作的情况下也可以运行。在目前的研究中,我们研究了这些“自动”纠正在多大程度上可能与执行功能的个体差异有关。为了检验这一点,健康的成年参与者(n = 80)在触摸屏上完成了两个版本的自动驾驶任务:(1)在“正确”条件下,参与者被指示在跳跃试验中纠正他们的运动到新的目标位置;(2)在“忽略”条件下,参与者被告知忽略任何目标跳跃,并指向初始目标位置。除了完成这两个版本的自动驾驶任务,参与者还完成了持续注意反应任务(SART),在这个任务中,他们被要求对除了3之外的数字做出反应。最后,参与者完成了包括成人ADHD自我报告量表(ASRS)、认知失败问卷(CFQ)和成人执行功能行为评定量表(BRIEF-A)在内的索引执行注意力、冲动和执行功能的自我报告问卷。我们的结果表明,与之前的研究类似,与“忽略”条件相比,参与者在“正确”条件下对目标跳跃的更正明显更多。重要的是,“忽略”条件下的“自动”无意更正与ASRS、CFQ和BRIEF-A的较差分数显著相关。然而,意想不到的纠正与SART上的错误或反应时间无关。这些结果表明,自动驾驶任务对自我报告的执行功能的个体差异很敏感,可能有助于在健康和临床人群中作为反应抑制和认知控制的视觉运动测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
228
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1966, Experimental Brain Research publishes original contributions on many aspects of experimental research of the central and peripheral nervous system. The focus is on molecular, physiology, behavior, neurochemistry, developmental, cellular and molecular neurobiology, and experimental pathology relevant to general problems of cerebral function. The journal publishes original papers, reviews, and mini-reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信