Patient experience in healthcare interventions: PROM and PREM evaluation in patients with multiple sclerosis after switching administration route of natalizumab.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Cristina Fernández-Cuerva, Aranzazu Linares-Alarcon, María José Morales Lara, Ana Maria Alonso Torres, Virginia Reyes-Garrido, Patricia Urbaneja, Alvaro Sanchez-Guijo Benavente
{"title":"Patient experience in healthcare interventions: PROM and PREM evaluation in patients with multiple sclerosis after switching administration route of natalizumab.","authors":"Cristina Fernández-Cuerva, Aranzazu Linares-Alarcon, María José Morales Lara, Ana Maria Alonso Torres, Virginia Reyes-Garrido, Patricia Urbaneja, Alvaro Sanchez-Guijo Benavente","doi":"10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Natalizumab is a disease-modifying drug approved for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. It is available as vials for intravenous administration and in 2021 was approved as syringes for the subcutaneous route; both have to be administered in a daycare unit in the hospital. Some studies have addressed the cost-effectiveness of changing the route of administration from intravenous to subcutaneous, but the Patient Reported Outcomes Measures (PROMs) and Patient Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) regarding this change have not yet been studied. The objective of this work is to assess switching from the intravenous route to the subcutaneous route in our centre through the evaluation of PROMs and PREMs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An implementation study was conducted to evaluate the PROMs and PREMs of patients after changing the route of administration of natalizumab from intravenous to subcutaneous. An ad hoc questionnaire was developed, in consensus with the neurology team, which was performed by telephone to patients who agreed to participate in the study. The questionnaire was divided into three fields: pain during administration for both routes, patient satisfaction and adverse events of subcutaneous administration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-seven patients participated in the study. They reported greater pain with subcutaneous administration, but no patient defined it as unbearable. The subcutaneous route was preferred by 97.9% of patients, who stated that this route of administration was less time consuming than the intravenous route. Regarding adverse events, 94.5% patients reported none, and itching was the most common local adverse event reported (29.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is a novel experience in our setting of collaboration between pharmacy and neurology services to implement PROMs and PREMs in the evaluation of a health intervention. Patients expressed satisfaction with changing the route of administration of natalizumab. This study has enabled us to detect interventions to use to achieve a better patient experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":12050,"journal":{"name":"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004378","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Natalizumab is a disease-modifying drug approved for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. It is available as vials for intravenous administration and in 2021 was approved as syringes for the subcutaneous route; both have to be administered in a daycare unit in the hospital. Some studies have addressed the cost-effectiveness of changing the route of administration from intravenous to subcutaneous, but the Patient Reported Outcomes Measures (PROMs) and Patient Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) regarding this change have not yet been studied. The objective of this work is to assess switching from the intravenous route to the subcutaneous route in our centre through the evaluation of PROMs and PREMs.

Methods: An implementation study was conducted to evaluate the PROMs and PREMs of patients after changing the route of administration of natalizumab from intravenous to subcutaneous. An ad hoc questionnaire was developed, in consensus with the neurology team, which was performed by telephone to patients who agreed to participate in the study. The questionnaire was divided into three fields: pain during administration for both routes, patient satisfaction and adverse events of subcutaneous administration.

Results: Forty-seven patients participated in the study. They reported greater pain with subcutaneous administration, but no patient defined it as unbearable. The subcutaneous route was preferred by 97.9% of patients, who stated that this route of administration was less time consuming than the intravenous route. Regarding adverse events, 94.5% patients reported none, and itching was the most common local adverse event reported (29.8%).

Conclusions: This is a novel experience in our setting of collaboration between pharmacy and neurology services to implement PROMs and PREMs in the evaluation of a health intervention. Patients expressed satisfaction with changing the route of administration of natalizumab. This study has enabled us to detect interventions to use to achieve a better patient experience.

患者在医疗保健干预方面的经验:转换纳他珠单抗给药途径后多发性硬化症患者的PROM和PREM评估
目的:Natalizumab是一种被批准用于治疗复发-缓解型多发性硬化症的疾病改善药物。它可作为小瓶用于静脉给药,并于2021年被批准为皮下途径的注射器;两者都必须在医院的日托病房进行治疗。一些研究已经讨论了将给药途径从静脉注射改为皮下注射的成本效益,但关于这一变化的患者报告结果测量(PROMs)和患者报告经验测量(PREMs)尚未进行研究。这项工作的目的是评估从静脉途径切换到皮下途径在我们中心通过评估PROMs和PREMs。方法:通过实施性研究,评价纳他珠单抗给药途径由静脉给药改为皮下给药后患者的PROMs和PREMs。在神经学团队的一致意见下,我们制作了一份特别问卷,通过电话向同意参加研究的患者进行问卷调查。问卷分为三个方面:两种给药方式的给药过程中的疼痛、患者满意度和皮下给药的不良事件。结果:47例患者参与研究。他们报告皮下给药的疼痛更大,但没有患者将其定义为无法忍受。97.9%的患者选择皮下给药,认为皮下给药比静脉给药时间短。94.5%的患者报告无不良反应,瘙痒是最常见的局部不良反应(29.8%)。结论:这是我们在药房和神经病学服务之间合作的一个新经验,在健康干预评估中实施PROMs和PREMs。患者对改变纳他珠单抗给药途径表示满意。这项研究使我们能够检测干预措施,以实现更好的患者体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
104
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy (EJHP) offers a high quality, peer-reviewed platform for the publication of practical and innovative research which aims to strengthen the profile and professional status of hospital pharmacists. EJHP is committed to being the leading journal on all aspects of hospital pharmacy, thereby advancing the science, practice and profession of hospital pharmacy. The journal aims to become a major source for education and inspiration to improve practice and the standard of patient care in hospitals and related institutions worldwide. EJHP is the only official journal of the European Association of Hospital Pharmacists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信