Drinking water access and quality in the Gaza Strip prior to 7 October 2023 and implications for reconstruction.

IF 5.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Curdin Brugger, Branwen Nia Owen, Bassam Abu Hamad, Tammo van Gastel, Federico Sittaro, Rodolfo Rossi, Nicole Probst-Hensch, Mirko S Winkler
{"title":"Drinking water access and quality in the Gaza Strip prior to 7 October 2023 and implications for reconstruction.","authors":"Curdin Brugger, Branwen Nia Owen, Bassam Abu Hamad, Tammo van Gastel, Federico Sittaro, Rodolfo Rossi, Nicole Probst-Hensch, Mirko S Winkler","doi":"10.1186/s12940-025-01191-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The water supply of the Gaza Strip has been unstable and under great strain for decades, resulting in major problems with the quality, reliability, and acceptability of drinking water. Destruction of water infrastructure and concerns over the quality of piped water have resulted in a complex constellation of drinking water sources. We aim to describe the different types of drinking water sources used by households, compare water quality from drinking water samples, present different water treatments used in households and highlight different insecurities around water access in households.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional household survey in North Gaza, Gaza and Rafah between January and March 2023. Using an interviewer-administered survey, we collected information on drinking water sources and insecurities and obtained a drinking water sample from the tap in the household. The water samples were analyzed for microbial contamination, nitrate, sodium and mineral content.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We collected data from 905 households. Only 3% had access to a single water source, 87% had access to two sources and 96% had access to piped water from the municipality. Piped municipal water was mainly used for hygiene and bathing, while the three most used sources for drinking were tanker trucks (82%), public taps (10%) and piped water from the municipalities (3.7%). Fecal coliform was present in 20% of water samples, 1% had high nitrate levels and nearly all samples had low mineral content. While around 15-19% of the households were sometimes or often water insecure, over 90% reported never drinking from undesirable sources, drinking unsafe water, or going to sleep thirsty. Households using municipal piped water tended to be most water secure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The water quality and insecurity about accessibility and quality of water pose a health threat and need to be addressed at system level. Rebuilding the water infrastructure will be a key element during the reconstruction after the current war. It is crucial that the shortcomings of the pre-war water system are not rebuilt, and lessons are learnt from pre-war data to establish a health-promoting water system in the Gaza Strip.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":11686,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"41"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12220596/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Health","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-025-01191-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The water supply of the Gaza Strip has been unstable and under great strain for decades, resulting in major problems with the quality, reliability, and acceptability of drinking water. Destruction of water infrastructure and concerns over the quality of piped water have resulted in a complex constellation of drinking water sources. We aim to describe the different types of drinking water sources used by households, compare water quality from drinking water samples, present different water treatments used in households and highlight different insecurities around water access in households.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional household survey in North Gaza, Gaza and Rafah between January and March 2023. Using an interviewer-administered survey, we collected information on drinking water sources and insecurities and obtained a drinking water sample from the tap in the household. The water samples were analyzed for microbial contamination, nitrate, sodium and mineral content.

Results: We collected data from 905 households. Only 3% had access to a single water source, 87% had access to two sources and 96% had access to piped water from the municipality. Piped municipal water was mainly used for hygiene and bathing, while the three most used sources for drinking were tanker trucks (82%), public taps (10%) and piped water from the municipalities (3.7%). Fecal coliform was present in 20% of water samples, 1% had high nitrate levels and nearly all samples had low mineral content. While around 15-19% of the households were sometimes or often water insecure, over 90% reported never drinking from undesirable sources, drinking unsafe water, or going to sleep thirsty. Households using municipal piped water tended to be most water secure.

Conclusions: The water quality and insecurity about accessibility and quality of water pose a health threat and need to be addressed at system level. Rebuilding the water infrastructure will be a key element during the reconstruction after the current war. It is crucial that the shortcomings of the pre-war water system are not rebuilt, and lessons are learnt from pre-war data to establish a health-promoting water system in the Gaza Strip.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

2023年10月7日之前加沙地带的饮用水供应和质量及其对重建的影响。
背景:几十年来,加沙地带的供水一直不稳定,压力很大,导致饮用水的质量、可靠性和可接受性存在重大问题。水基础设施的破坏和对管道水质量的担忧导致了饮用水源的复杂分布。我们的目的是描述家庭使用的不同类型的饮用水源,比较饮用水样本的水质,介绍家庭使用的不同水处理方法,并强调家庭用水获取的不同不安全感。方法:我们于2023年1 - 3月在加沙北部、加沙和拉法进行了横断面家庭调查。通过访谈者管理的调查,我们收集了饮用水来源和不安全的信息,并从家庭的水龙头中获得了饮用水样本。对水样进行微生物污染、硝酸盐、钠和矿物质含量分析。结果:我们收集了905户家庭的数据。只有3%的人可以获得单一水源,87%的人可以获得两个水源,96%的人可以获得市政当局的自来水。市政管道水主要用于卫生和洗浴,而三个最常用的饮用水源是油罐车(82%)、公共水龙头(10%)和市政当局的管道水(3.7%)。20%的水样中含有粪便大肠菌群,1%的水样中硝酸盐含量高,几乎所有水样的矿物质含量都很低。虽然约有15-19%的家庭有时或经常存在用水不安全问题,但90%以上的家庭报告称,他们从未饮用不受欢迎的水源、饮用不安全的水,或在口渴时入睡。使用市政自来水的家庭往往是最安全的。结论:水质、可及性和水质不安全构成健康威胁,需要在系统层面加以解决。重建水利基础设施将是战后重建的关键因素。至关重要的是,不要重建战前供水系统的缺点,并从战前数据中吸取教训,在加沙地带建立促进健康的供水系统。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Health
Environmental Health 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
1.70%
发文量
115
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Health publishes manuscripts on all aspects of environmental and occupational medicine and related studies in toxicology and epidemiology. Environmental Health is aimed at scientists and practitioners in all areas of environmental science where human health and well-being are involved, either directly or indirectly. Environmental Health is a public health journal serving the public health community and scientists working on matters of public health interest and importance pertaining to the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信