Outpatient versus inpatient surgery for ankle fractures - a protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Christian Gr Rasmussen, Peter Larsen, Christian Pedersen, Rasmus Elsoe
{"title":"Outpatient versus inpatient surgery for ankle fractures - a protocol for a randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Christian Gr Rasmussen, Peter Larsen, Christian Pedersen, Rasmus Elsoe","doi":"10.61409/A10240746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In recent years, outpatient surgical treatment for ankle fractures has been introduced for selected fracture types and patients with a low degree of comorbidity. Limited evidence is available to guide the choice between inpatient and outpatient care for ankle fractures. This randomised controlled trial aims to investigate the effect of inpatient versus outpatient surgery of ankle fractures on patient-reported outcomes at 12 weeks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a single-centre non-inferiority randomised controlled trial investigating outpatient care for surgically treated ankle fractures. A total of 86 patients will be included in the study and randomised 1:1 to either outpatient or inpatient care. The primary outcome is the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score at three months after surgery. Secondary outcomes will include patient satisfaction, pain, physical function and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Conducting a randomised controlled trial investigating inpatient versus outpatient surgery for ankle fractures on both patient-reported outcomes, patient satisfaction, adverse events, pain, function and bone healing will provide evidence to guide future recommendations in the planning of surgical treatment for ankle fractures.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>The study is partially funded by Helsefonden and the North Denmark Region.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study was pre-registered on Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT05389436, 20 May 2022.</p>","PeriodicalId":11119,"journal":{"name":"Danish medical journal","volume":"72 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Danish medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61409/A10240746","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In recent years, outpatient surgical treatment for ankle fractures has been introduced for selected fracture types and patients with a low degree of comorbidity. Limited evidence is available to guide the choice between inpatient and outpatient care for ankle fractures. This randomised controlled trial aims to investigate the effect of inpatient versus outpatient surgery of ankle fractures on patient-reported outcomes at 12 weeks.

Methods: This study is a single-centre non-inferiority randomised controlled trial investigating outpatient care for surgically treated ankle fractures. A total of 86 patients will be included in the study and randomised 1:1 to either outpatient or inpatient care. The primary outcome is the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score at three months after surgery. Secondary outcomes will include patient satisfaction, pain, physical function and adverse events.

Conclusions: Conducting a randomised controlled trial investigating inpatient versus outpatient surgery for ankle fractures on both patient-reported outcomes, patient satisfaction, adverse events, pain, function and bone healing will provide evidence to guide future recommendations in the planning of surgical treatment for ankle fractures.

Funding: The study is partially funded by Helsefonden and the North Denmark Region.

Trial registration: The study was pre-registered on Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT05389436, 20 May 2022.

踝关节骨折的门诊手术与住院手术——一项随机对照试验的方案。
近年来,针对特定骨折类型和低合并症的患者,引入了踝部骨折的门诊手术治疗。有限的证据可用于指导踝关节骨折住院和门诊护理的选择。本随机对照试验旨在探讨住院和门诊手术治疗踝关节骨折对患者报告的12周预后的影响。方法:本研究是一项单中心非效性随机对照试验,调查手术治疗踝关节骨折的门诊护理情况。共有86名患者将被纳入研究,并按1:1的比例随机分配到门诊或住院治疗。主要结果是术后3个月的足部和踝关节预后评分。次要结局包括患者满意度、疼痛、身体功能和不良事件。结论:开展一项随机对照试验,调查踝关节骨折住院患者与门诊手术患者报告的结果、患者满意度、不良事件、疼痛、功能和骨愈合情况,将为指导踝关节骨折手术治疗计划提供证据。资助:本研究部分由Helsefonden和北丹麦地区资助。试验注册:该研究已于2022年5月20日在Clinicaltrials.gov上预注册,ID: NCT05389436。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Danish medical journal
Danish medical journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
78
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Danish Medical Journal (DMJ) is a general medical journal. The journal publish original research in English – conducted in or in relation to the Danish health-care system. When writing for the Danish Medical Journal please remember target audience which is the general reader. This means that the research area should be relevant to many readers and the paper should be presented in a way that most readers will understand the content. DMJ will publish the following articles: • Original articles • Protocol articles from large randomized clinical trials • Systematic reviews and meta-analyses • PhD theses from Danish faculties of health sciences • DMSc theses from Danish faculties of health sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信