Health information system in primary health care units of the Central Zone, Tigray, Northern Ethiopia.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Letekirstos Gebreegziabher Gebretsadik, Abate Bekele Belachew, Gebregziabher Berihu Gebrekidan, Alemayohu Bayray, Akberet Lemlem, Lewtnesh Berihun Dangew, Haftom Temesgen Abebe
{"title":"Health information system in primary health care units of the Central Zone, Tigray, Northern Ethiopia.","authors":"Letekirstos Gebreegziabher Gebretsadik, Abate Bekele Belachew, Gebregziabher Berihu Gebrekidan, Alemayohu Bayray, Akberet Lemlem, Lewtnesh Berihun Dangew, Haftom Temesgen Abebe","doi":"10.1186/s12911-025-03078-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health information systems require the management of health information through health management information systems and research and knowledge management. In many low-income countries, including Ethiopia, poor data quality and limited use of health information remain major challenges in the health system. Reliable health data quality is essential for evidence-based decision-making and improving quality health service delivery. This study aimed to assess and explore the contextual factors of the quality and utilization of health information in primary health care units in the Central Zone, Tigray, Northern Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A facility-based cross-sectional quantitative and qualitative study design was used. A total of seven primary health care units and four district health offices were selected. Data were collected via document review, structured questionnaires and in-depth interviews. A three-month document review was conducted to assess data accuracy via lot quality assurance sampling. Forty-eight health professionals, including Woreda Health Office heads, facility heads, health management information system focal persons, service providers and health extension workers, were interviewed for quantitative analysis. Additionally, 23 key informants with the same roles participated in the qualitative interviews. Descriptive statistics were computed, and thematic analysis was conducted for the qualitative data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four of the seven primary health care units have assigned health management information system personnel, and five of them have necessary equipment for health management information systems. The average lot quality assurance sampling of the primary health care units ranged from 35 to 60%, which falls below the national threshold of 90% data accuracy. In knowing and measuring the dimensions of data quality, the informants described this as a difficult task despite acknowledging its importance. Similarly, the culture of data use for decision making was limited.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study revealed that primary health care units in the Central Zone of Tigray face significant challenges in terms of data quality and utilization, primarily due to the limited capacity of service providers, unclear understanding of data quality dimensions and weak data use culture. The average lot quality assurance sampling accuracy rates are below the acceptable level, indicating issues in the data documentation and validation processes. Addressing these gaps through targeted capacity-building, including the integration of HMIS curricula at the university level and system-level improvements such as implementing computerized systems, ensuring accountability and allocating budgets, is needed to strengthen health information systems and enable evidence-based decision-making at all levels of the health system.</p>","PeriodicalId":9340,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","volume":"25 1","pages":"233"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12220773/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-025-03078-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Health information systems require the management of health information through health management information systems and research and knowledge management. In many low-income countries, including Ethiopia, poor data quality and limited use of health information remain major challenges in the health system. Reliable health data quality is essential for evidence-based decision-making and improving quality health service delivery. This study aimed to assess and explore the contextual factors of the quality and utilization of health information in primary health care units in the Central Zone, Tigray, Northern Ethiopia.

Methods: A facility-based cross-sectional quantitative and qualitative study design was used. A total of seven primary health care units and four district health offices were selected. Data were collected via document review, structured questionnaires and in-depth interviews. A three-month document review was conducted to assess data accuracy via lot quality assurance sampling. Forty-eight health professionals, including Woreda Health Office heads, facility heads, health management information system focal persons, service providers and health extension workers, were interviewed for quantitative analysis. Additionally, 23 key informants with the same roles participated in the qualitative interviews. Descriptive statistics were computed, and thematic analysis was conducted for the qualitative data.

Results: Four of the seven primary health care units have assigned health management information system personnel, and five of them have necessary equipment for health management information systems. The average lot quality assurance sampling of the primary health care units ranged from 35 to 60%, which falls below the national threshold of 90% data accuracy. In knowing and measuring the dimensions of data quality, the informants described this as a difficult task despite acknowledging its importance. Similarly, the culture of data use for decision making was limited.

Conclusion: This study revealed that primary health care units in the Central Zone of Tigray face significant challenges in terms of data quality and utilization, primarily due to the limited capacity of service providers, unclear understanding of data quality dimensions and weak data use culture. The average lot quality assurance sampling accuracy rates are below the acceptable level, indicating issues in the data documentation and validation processes. Addressing these gaps through targeted capacity-building, including the integration of HMIS curricula at the university level and system-level improvements such as implementing computerized systems, ensuring accountability and allocating budgets, is needed to strengthen health information systems and enable evidence-based decision-making at all levels of the health system.

埃塞俄比亚北部提格雷中央区初级卫生保健单位的卫生信息系统。
背景:卫生信息系统要求通过卫生管理信息系统、研究和知识管理对卫生信息进行管理。在包括埃塞俄比亚在内的许多低收入国家,数据质量差和卫生信息使用有限仍然是卫生系统面临的主要挑战。可靠的卫生数据质量对于基于证据的决策和改善高质量的卫生服务提供至关重要。本研究旨在评估和探讨埃塞俄比亚北部提格雷中部地区初级卫生保健单位卫生信息质量和利用的背景因素。方法:采用基于设施的横断面定量和定性研究设计。总共选出了7个初级保健单位和4个地区保健办事处。通过文献回顾、结构化问卷调查和深度访谈收集数据。进行了为期三个月的文件审查,以通过批次质量保证抽样评估数据的准确性。对48名卫生专业人员进行了访谈,包括世界卫生组织卫生办公室主任、设施负责人、卫生管理信息系统重点人员、服务提供者和卫生推广工作者。此外,23名具有相同角色的关键线人参加了定性访谈。进行描述性统计,对定性数据进行专题分析。结果:7家基层卫生保健单位中有4家配备了卫生管理信息系统人员,其中5家具备卫生管理信息系统必备设备。初级卫生保健单位的平均批次质量保证抽样范围为35%至60%,低于90%数据准确性的国家门槛。在了解和衡量数据质量方面,尽管承认其重要性,但举报人认为这是一项艰巨的任务。同样,数据用于决策的文化也是有限的。结论:本研究表明,提格雷中部地区的初级卫生保健单位在数据质量和利用方面面临重大挑战,主要原因是服务提供商能力有限,对数据质量维度的理解不清,以及数据使用文化薄弱。平均批次质量保证抽样准确率低于可接受水平,表明数据文件和验证过程中存在问题。需要通过有针对性的能力建设来解决这些差距,包括整合大学一级的医疗卫生信息系统课程和系统一级的改进,例如实施计算机化系统、确保问责制和分配预算,以加强卫生信息系统并使各级卫生系统能够进行循证决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the design, development, implementation, use, and evaluation of health information technologies and decision-making for human health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信