Framework for key benchmarking indicators in hospital information system.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Asghar Ehteshami, Ahamad-Reza Raeisi, Maedeh Rashedi, Yasin Sabet Kouhanjani
{"title":"Framework for key benchmarking indicators in hospital information system.","authors":"Asghar Ehteshami, Ahamad-Reza Raeisi, Maedeh Rashedi, Yasin Sabet Kouhanjani","doi":"10.1186/s12911-025-03038-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Developing key benchmarking indicators (KBIs) for Hospital Information Systems (HIS) has the potential to enhance operational efficiency and effectiveness, resulting in the successful achievement of hospital goals. This study endeavored to develop a comprehensive framework of KBIs for HIS to address the need for structured evaluation in healthcare systems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study was conducted at Ahvaz Jundishapour University of Medical Sciences' academic hospitals. The study comprised two distinct phases. In the initial phase, data collection involved purposive sampling with a snowball technique, consisting of 14 semi-structured interviews with health information technology, medical informatics, and health information management experts. During the second phase, benchmarking indicators were extracted through conventional content analysis and prioritized using two rounds of the Delphi technique.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study identified three main themes and eight sub-themes, including Technical (software, hardware, architecture and user interface, and outputs), Human and Organizational (vendors, IT support, and HIS workflows), and Financial (costs). A total of 76 KBIs were developed and prioritized, with key indicators such as user-friendliness and response time scoring 100% in importance, while others like cost-effectiveness and interoperability quality scored 96.4% and 98.8%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The proposed framework incorporates essential benchmarking indicators intended to enhance HIS efficiency, effectiveness, and successful attainment of its objectives. These indicators may serve as a comprehensive tool for Health Information Technology managers to benchmark their HISs. Practical implications include the potential for hospital administrators to identify gaps in system performance, optimize resource allocation, and improve user satisfaction by applying the KBIs. The framework may also guide decision-making processes, supporting alignment with organizational goals and promoting the long-term sustainability of HIS implementations.</p>","PeriodicalId":9340,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","volume":"25 1","pages":"213"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12210575/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-025-03038-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Developing key benchmarking indicators (KBIs) for Hospital Information Systems (HIS) has the potential to enhance operational efficiency and effectiveness, resulting in the successful achievement of hospital goals. This study endeavored to develop a comprehensive framework of KBIs for HIS to address the need for structured evaluation in healthcare systems.

Methods: This qualitative study was conducted at Ahvaz Jundishapour University of Medical Sciences' academic hospitals. The study comprised two distinct phases. In the initial phase, data collection involved purposive sampling with a snowball technique, consisting of 14 semi-structured interviews with health information technology, medical informatics, and health information management experts. During the second phase, benchmarking indicators were extracted through conventional content analysis and prioritized using two rounds of the Delphi technique.

Results: The study identified three main themes and eight sub-themes, including Technical (software, hardware, architecture and user interface, and outputs), Human and Organizational (vendors, IT support, and HIS workflows), and Financial (costs). A total of 76 KBIs were developed and prioritized, with key indicators such as user-friendliness and response time scoring 100% in importance, while others like cost-effectiveness and interoperability quality scored 96.4% and 98.8%, respectively.

Conclusion: The proposed framework incorporates essential benchmarking indicators intended to enhance HIS efficiency, effectiveness, and successful attainment of its objectives. These indicators may serve as a comprehensive tool for Health Information Technology managers to benchmark their HISs. Practical implications include the potential for hospital administrators to identify gaps in system performance, optimize resource allocation, and improve user satisfaction by applying the KBIs. The framework may also guide decision-making processes, supporting alignment with organizational goals and promoting the long-term sustainability of HIS implementations.

医院信息系统关键标杆指标框架。
导言:为医院信息系统(HIS)制定关键基准指标(KBIs)具有提高运营效率和有效性的潜力,从而成功实现医院目标。本研究试图为医疗保健系统开发一个全面的kbi框架,以解决医疗保健系统中对结构化评估的需求。方法:本定性研究在阿瓦士君迪沙普尔医科大学附属学术医院进行。这项研究包括两个不同的阶段。在初始阶段,数据收集涉及使用滚雪球技术进行有目的的抽样,包括与卫生信息技术、医学信息学和卫生信息管理专家进行14次半结构化访谈。在第二阶段,通过常规的内容分析提取基准指标,并使用两轮德尔菲技术确定优先级。结果:该研究确定了三个主要主题和八个次要主题,包括技术(软件、硬件、架构和用户界面以及输出)、人力和组织(供应商、IT支持和HIS工作流)和财务(成本)。总共开发了76个kbi并对其进行了优先排序,其中关键指标(如用户友好性和响应时间)的重要性得分为100%,而其他指标(如成本效益和互操作性质量)的重要性分别为96.4%和98.8%。结论:拟议的框架包含了旨在提高HIS效率、有效性和成功实现其目标的基本基准指标。这些指标可以作为卫生信息技术管理人员对其HISs进行基准测试的综合工具。实际意义包括医院管理人员通过应用kbi识别系统性能差距、优化资源分配和提高用户满意度的潜力。该框架还可以指导决策过程,支持与组织目标保持一致,并促进卫生信息系统实施的长期可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the design, development, implementation, use, and evaluation of health information technologies and decision-making for human health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信