A systematic review of microsimulation models for skin cancer.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Caroline G Watts, Kirstie G McLoughlin, Stephen Wade, Amelia K Smit, H Peter Soyer, Pablo Fernandez-Peñas, David C Whiteman, Pascale Guitera, Gillian Reyes-Marcelino, Karen Canfell, Anne E Cust, Michael Caruana
{"title":"A systematic review of microsimulation models for skin cancer.","authors":"Caroline G Watts, Kirstie G McLoughlin, Stephen Wade, Amelia K Smit, H Peter Soyer, Pablo Fernandez-Peñas, David C Whiteman, Pascale Guitera, Gillian Reyes-Marcelino, Karen Canfell, Anne E Cust, Michael Caruana","doi":"10.1186/s12911-025-03074-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Simulation modelling can assist with health care decision making. To inform the development and improvement of skin cancer focussed microsimulation models, we conducted a systematic review and narrative synthesis of published skin cancer models to assess the structure, parameterisation, and assumptions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The electronic databases OVIDMedline including Embase and the Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (CEA) Registry were searched up to 7 May 2025. Studies that included microsimulation of individuals who developed or had skin cancer were eligible for inclusion. No restrictions on publication date or language were applied. The outcomes of interest were the purpose of the models, characteristics of the models and applicability for modelling skin cancer screening.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two models were identified from the systematic review. Nineteen papers modelled melanoma, and two papers modelled keratinocyte or non-melanoma skin cancer, and one paper modelled both melanoma and keratinocyte cancer. The models were developed to assess treatment strategies (n = 10), skin cancer screening programs (n = 7), diagnostic techniques (n = 3), post-diagnosis surveillance (n = 3), preventative interventions (n = 1) and time to treatment (n = 1), with three models reporting dual aims. There was substantial variation in the simulation of the natural history of melanoma between models, with more recent models having separate natural history and clinical modules. The quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment Reporting for Microsimulation Models (QARMM) checklist and the majority of models were assessed to be of moderate quality. Limitations from these models included assuming an average tumour behaviour and constant melanoma development and progression over time. Data availability was also noted as a limitation for some models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most microsimulation models related to skin cancer have focused on late-stage treatment strategies. Tumour characteristics, apart from stage at diagnosis, were not accounted for in most models.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42024504250.</p>","PeriodicalId":9340,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","volume":"25 1","pages":"222"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12211653/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-025-03074-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Simulation modelling can assist with health care decision making. To inform the development and improvement of skin cancer focussed microsimulation models, we conducted a systematic review and narrative synthesis of published skin cancer models to assess the structure, parameterisation, and assumptions.

Methods: The electronic databases OVIDMedline including Embase and the Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (CEA) Registry were searched up to 7 May 2025. Studies that included microsimulation of individuals who developed or had skin cancer were eligible for inclusion. No restrictions on publication date or language were applied. The outcomes of interest were the purpose of the models, characteristics of the models and applicability for modelling skin cancer screening.

Results: Twenty-two models were identified from the systematic review. Nineteen papers modelled melanoma, and two papers modelled keratinocyte or non-melanoma skin cancer, and one paper modelled both melanoma and keratinocyte cancer. The models were developed to assess treatment strategies (n = 10), skin cancer screening programs (n = 7), diagnostic techniques (n = 3), post-diagnosis surveillance (n = 3), preventative interventions (n = 1) and time to treatment (n = 1), with three models reporting dual aims. There was substantial variation in the simulation of the natural history of melanoma between models, with more recent models having separate natural history and clinical modules. The quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment Reporting for Microsimulation Models (QARMM) checklist and the majority of models were assessed to be of moderate quality. Limitations from these models included assuming an average tumour behaviour and constant melanoma development and progression over time. Data availability was also noted as a limitation for some models.

Conclusions: Most microsimulation models related to skin cancer have focused on late-stage treatment strategies. Tumour characteristics, apart from stage at diagnosis, were not accounted for in most models.

Prospero registration number: CRD42024504250.

皮肤癌微观模拟模型的系统综述。
背景:仿真建模可以辅助医疗保健决策。为了为皮肤癌微模拟模型的发展和改进提供信息,我们对已发表的皮肤癌模型进行了系统回顾和叙事综合,以评估其结构、参数化和假设。方法:检索截至2025年5月7日的OVIDMedline电子数据库(包括Embase和CEA)。包括发展或患有皮肤癌的个体的微观模拟的研究符合纳入条件。没有对出版日期或语言加以限制。感兴趣的结果是模型的目的,模型的特征和建模皮肤癌筛查的适用性。结果:从系统评价中确定了22个模型。19篇论文模拟了黑色素瘤,两篇论文模拟了角质细胞或非黑色素瘤皮肤癌,一篇论文同时模拟了黑色素瘤和角质细胞癌。这些模型用于评估治疗策略(n = 10)、皮肤癌筛查计划(n = 7)、诊断技术(n = 3)、诊断后监测(n = 3)、预防干预(n = 1)和治疗时间(n = 1),其中三个模型报告了双重目标。不同模型之间的黑色素瘤自然史模拟存在很大差异,较新的模型具有独立的自然史和临床模块。使用微模拟模型质量评估报告(QARMM)检查表对质量进行评估,大多数模型被评估为中等质量。这些模型的局限性包括假设平均肿瘤行为和黑色素瘤随时间的持续发展和进展。数据的可用性也被认为是某些模型的限制。结论:大多数与皮肤癌相关的微观模拟模型都集中在晚期治疗策略上。在大多数模型中,除了诊断阶段外,肿瘤特征没有被考虑在内。普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD42024504250。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the design, development, implementation, use, and evaluation of health information technologies and decision-making for human health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信