Evaluation of the effects of different polishing systems on surface roughness and surface discoloration of various restorative materials.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Tuba Sarıcı, Burak Dayı
{"title":"Evaluation of the effects of different polishing systems on surface roughness and surface discoloration of various restorative materials.","authors":"Tuba Sarıcı, Burak Dayı","doi":"10.1186/s12903-025-06335-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This in-vitro study aimed to evaluate the effects of different polishing systems on the surface roughness and discoloration of various composite resins, and to assess the effectiveness of repolishing procedures in reducing discoloration.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Four different composite resins (giomer, nanohybrid, nanoceramic, microhybrid) were polished using various systems. Surface roughness was evaluated using mechanical profilometer, Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM). Surface morphology was examined by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). Samples were immersed in a coffee solution for staining, followed by repolishing. Color change (ΔE) values were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Surface roughness and discoloration varied based on the composite type and polishing system. The smoothest surface was observed in the nanohybrid composite polished with OptiDisc (Ra: 0.59), while the roughest surface was seen in the nanoceramic composite polished with Lucida (Ra: 1.70). The highest discoloration occurred in the giomer with Enhance PoGo, while Twist Dia produced the most stain-resistant surfaces (p = 0.008). Repolishing with the OptiDisc significantly reduced discoloration, with ΔE values falling within clinically acceptable limits only in this group (p = 0.00671).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multi-step polishing systems, those containing aluminum oxide were more effective in achieving smoother surfaces and better color stability. Results varied according to the composite material and the polishing system used.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>This study emphasizes that different polishing systems may lead to differences that could potentially affect the clinical performance and aesthetic longevity of composite resins.</p>","PeriodicalId":9072,"journal":{"name":"BMC Oral Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"978"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Oral Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-06335-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This in-vitro study aimed to evaluate the effects of different polishing systems on the surface roughness and discoloration of various composite resins, and to assess the effectiveness of repolishing procedures in reducing discoloration.

Materials and methods: Four different composite resins (giomer, nanohybrid, nanoceramic, microhybrid) were polished using various systems. Surface roughness was evaluated using mechanical profilometer, Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM). Surface morphology was examined by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). Samples were immersed in a coffee solution for staining, followed by repolishing. Color change (ΔE) values were recorded.

Results: Surface roughness and discoloration varied based on the composite type and polishing system. The smoothest surface was observed in the nanohybrid composite polished with OptiDisc (Ra: 0.59), while the roughest surface was seen in the nanoceramic composite polished with Lucida (Ra: 1.70). The highest discoloration occurred in the giomer with Enhance PoGo, while Twist Dia produced the most stain-resistant surfaces (p = 0.008). Repolishing with the OptiDisc significantly reduced discoloration, with ΔE values falling within clinically acceptable limits only in this group (p = 0.00671).

Conclusions: Multi-step polishing systems, those containing aluminum oxide were more effective in achieving smoother surfaces and better color stability. Results varied according to the composite material and the polishing system used.

Clinical significance: This study emphasizes that different polishing systems may lead to differences that could potentially affect the clinical performance and aesthetic longevity of composite resins.

评价不同抛光系统对各种修复材料表面粗糙度和表面变色的影响。
目的:本实验旨在评估不同抛光系统对不同复合树脂表面粗糙度和变色的影响,并评估再抛光程序在减少变色方面的有效性。材料与方法:采用不同的抛光体系对四种不同的复合树脂(聚醚树脂、纳米杂化树脂、纳米陶瓷树脂、微杂化树脂)进行抛光。表面粗糙度评估使用机械轮廓仪,原子力显微镜(AFM)。用扫描电镜(SEM)观察表面形貌。样品浸泡在咖啡溶液中染色,然后再抛光。记录颜色变化(ΔE)值。结果:复合材料类型和抛光系统不同,表面粗糙度和变色程度也不同。用OptiDisc抛光的纳米复合材料表面最光滑(Ra: 0.59),用Lucida抛光的纳米陶瓷复合材料表面最粗糙(Ra: 1.70)。使用Enhance PoGo的异构体变色程度最高,而Twist Dia的异构体表面最耐染色(p = 0.008)。使用OptiDisc重新抛光可显著减少变色,ΔE值仅在该组中落在临床可接受的范围内(p = 0.00671)。结论:多步抛光系统,那些含有氧化铝更有效地实现光滑的表面和更好的颜色稳定性。结果根据复合材料和抛光系统的不同而不同。临床意义:本研究强调不同的抛光系统可能会导致差异,这可能会影响复合树脂的临床性能和美观寿命。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Oral Health
BMC Oral Health DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
481
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Oral Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the mouth, teeth and gums, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信