Comparison of polymerization behaviors, microhardness and compressive strength between bulk-fill resin and dual-cured core resin.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Hye Jeong Kim, Jiyoung Kwon, Hyun-Jung Kim, Reuben H Kim, Duck-Su Kim, Ji-Hyun Jang
{"title":"Comparison of polymerization behaviors, microhardness and compressive strength between bulk-fill resin and dual-cured core resin.","authors":"Hye Jeong Kim, Jiyoung Kwon, Hyun-Jung Kim, Reuben H Kim, Duck-Su Kim, Ji-Hyun Jang","doi":"10.1186/s12903-025-06353-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the polymerization shrinkage, microhardness, DOC, and compressive strength of composite resin materials employed for core restoration, encompassing dual-cured core resin composites and LC bulk-fill composites.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Bulk-fill resin composites [Filtek One Bulk fill (BFO), Bulk Fill Base (BBB), Metafil Bulkfill One (BMF)] and dual-cured core resin composites (Luxacore Z, Any-Core) served as the experimental group, while two conventional LC resin composites [Filtek Z350 (FTZ), metafil flo (FMF)] served as the control group. Two dual-cured core resin composites were named as follows, CLD, CLS (Luxacore Z, in dual-cured mode and self-cured (SC) mode); CAD and CAS (Any-Core, in dual-cured mode and SC mode). Linear polymerization shrinkage, depth of cure (DOC) using microhardness, and compressive strength were evaluated for each experimental group. The results were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, and a post-hoc test (Duncan's test) was performed at a 95% confidence level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The linear polymerization shrinkage rate was higher in the dual-pol9ymerization core resin group than in the control group FTZ and bulk-fill resin groups, and in each dual-cured core resin, the dual-cured group was higher than the SC group. The DOC was higher in the bulk-fill resin group than in the control group, and the DOC of the dual-cured core resin group showed a significant variation depending on the product. The compressive strength of the bulk-fill resin group showed a significant variation depending on the product. The compressive strength in the bulk-fill resin group was higher as the filler content increased in the dual-cured mode than the SC mode in the dual-cured core resin group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Bulk-fill resins showed superior polymerization shrinkage and DOC compared to conventional resin composites and dual-cured core resins. At 4 mm depth, Bulk-fill resin composites achieved an appropriate DOC, but for dual-cured core resins, the DOC varied depending on the product.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Highly filled bulk-fill resins could be a predictable restorative material for deep cavities and post-endodontic core material, considering its polymerization shrinkage, DOC, and mechanical properties.</p>","PeriodicalId":9072,"journal":{"name":"BMC Oral Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"972"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12220753/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Oral Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-06353-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the polymerization shrinkage, microhardness, DOC, and compressive strength of composite resin materials employed for core restoration, encompassing dual-cured core resin composites and LC bulk-fill composites.

Methods: Bulk-fill resin composites [Filtek One Bulk fill (BFO), Bulk Fill Base (BBB), Metafil Bulkfill One (BMF)] and dual-cured core resin composites (Luxacore Z, Any-Core) served as the experimental group, while two conventional LC resin composites [Filtek Z350 (FTZ), metafil flo (FMF)] served as the control group. Two dual-cured core resin composites were named as follows, CLD, CLS (Luxacore Z, in dual-cured mode and self-cured (SC) mode); CAD and CAS (Any-Core, in dual-cured mode and SC mode). Linear polymerization shrinkage, depth of cure (DOC) using microhardness, and compressive strength were evaluated for each experimental group. The results were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, and a post-hoc test (Duncan's test) was performed at a 95% confidence level.

Results: The linear polymerization shrinkage rate was higher in the dual-pol9ymerization core resin group than in the control group FTZ and bulk-fill resin groups, and in each dual-cured core resin, the dual-cured group was higher than the SC group. The DOC was higher in the bulk-fill resin group than in the control group, and the DOC of the dual-cured core resin group showed a significant variation depending on the product. The compressive strength of the bulk-fill resin group showed a significant variation depending on the product. The compressive strength in the bulk-fill resin group was higher as the filler content increased in the dual-cured mode than the SC mode in the dual-cured core resin group.

Conclusions: Bulk-fill resins showed superior polymerization shrinkage and DOC compared to conventional resin composites and dual-cured core resins. At 4 mm depth, Bulk-fill resin composites achieved an appropriate DOC, but for dual-cured core resins, the DOC varied depending on the product.

Clinical significance: Highly filled bulk-fill resins could be a predictable restorative material for deep cavities and post-endodontic core material, considering its polymerization shrinkage, DOC, and mechanical properties.

块体填充树脂与双固化芯材的聚合行为、显微硬度和抗压强度比较。
目的:研究复合树脂材料用于岩心修复的聚合收缩率、显微硬度、DOC和抗压强度,包括双固化岩心树脂复合材料和LC块体填充复合材料。方法:填充型树脂复合材料[Filtek One Bulkfill (BFO), Bulkfill Base (BBB), Metafil Bulkfill One (BMF)]和双固化芯型树脂复合材料(Luxacore Z, Any-Core)作为实验组,两种常规LC树脂复合材料[Filtek Z350 (FTZ), Metafil flo (FMF)]作为对照组。两种双固化芯型树脂复合材料命名如下:CLD、CLS (Luxacore Z,双固化模式和自固化模式);CAD和CAS (Any-Core,双固化模式和SC模式)。对各实验组的线性聚合收缩率、显微硬度法测定的固化深度(DOC)和抗压强度进行了评价。结果采用单因素方差分析,并在95%置信水平上进行事后检验(邓肯检验)。结果:双聚合芯树脂组的线性聚合收缩率高于对照组FTZ组和填充树脂组,且在各双固化芯树脂中,双固化组均高于SC组。体填充树脂组的DOC高于对照组,双固化核心树脂组的DOC随产品的不同而有显著的变化。体积填充树脂组的抗压强度随产品的不同而有显著的变化。双固化型堆芯树脂组抗压强度随填料含量的增加而高于双固化型堆芯树脂组。结论:与常规树脂复合材料和双固化核心树脂相比,填充树脂具有更好的聚合收缩率和DOC。在4mm深度,大块填充树脂复合材料获得了适当的DOC,但对于双固化的核心树脂,DOC因产品而异。临床意义:考虑到高填充体填充树脂的聚合收缩率、DOC和力学性能,高填充体填充树脂可以作为一种可预测的深腔和牙髓后核材料的修复材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Oral Health
BMC Oral Health DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
481
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Oral Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the mouth, teeth and gums, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信