NHANES 2005-2018 data reveal high albumin-bilirubin scores are associated with depression.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Qing-Zhong Li, Jia-Xin Tan, Guo-Tian Ruan, Quan-Zhi Qin, Teng Deng, Yi-Zhen Gong
{"title":"NHANES 2005-2018 data reveal high albumin-bilirubin scores are associated with depression.","authors":"Qing-Zhong Li, Jia-Xin Tan, Guo-Tian Ruan, Quan-Zhi Qin, Teng Deng, Yi-Zhen Gong","doi":"10.1186/s12888-025-07082-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Depression has been recognized as a leading global contributor to disease burden and mortality. While the etiology of depression involves a complex interplay of biological, psychological, and social factors, its precise pathophysiological mechanisms remain incompletely understood. The albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score, originally developed as an objective measure of hepatic function, has demonstrated prognostic value in diverse clinical contexts including liver diseases, brain tumors and chronic heart failure. However, the relationship between ALBI scores and depression has not been systematically investigated. This study aims to examine the association between ALBI scores and depression in a nationally representative cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This population-based cross-sectional study utilized data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) spanning seven survey cycles (2005-2018). The ALBI score was calculated using the established formula: ALBI = (log10 bilirubin [μmol/L] × 0.66) + (albumin [g/L] × -0.085). Depression was assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Weighted multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to analyze the association between ALBI and depression, adjusting for potential covariates. Nonlinear relationships were explored using restricted cubic splines (RCS). The robustness of the results was validated through subgroup analyses. The relationship between ALBI and depression symptoms severity was evaluated via ANOVA. For prognostic analysis, Cox proportional hazards regression models assessed the link between ALBI and clinical outcomes, complemented by Kaplan-Meier (K-M) survival curves and RCS plots to illustrate trends.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Weighted multivariable logistic regression models revealed a significant association between elevated ALBI scores and depression risk. Participants in the higher ALBI (ALBI≧ -2.87) demonstrated 16% increased odds of depression compared to the reference (ALBI < -2.87) (adjusted OR = 1.16, 95% CI 1.03-1.31, P = 0.01). Restricted cubic spline analysis confirmed a linear relationship between continuous ALBI scores and depression risk. Subgroup analyses stratified by age, gender, race, education, smoking, drinking and diabetes consistently identified high ALBI as an independent risk factor for depression. The analysis of variance revealed a significant dose-response relationship between ALBI and depression symptom severity (P < 0.05). Cox proportional hazards models revealed significant associations between ALBI increments and mortality risks in the depression cohort. For all-cause mortality, each 1-unit ALBI elevation was associated with a 284% increased risk (adjusted HR = 3.84, 95% CI 2.77-5.33, P < 0.01). Cancer-related mortality showed a 235% risk escalation per ALBI unit (HR = 3.35, 95% CI 1.54-7.26, P < 0.01), while non-cancer deaths exhibited an stronger association at 296% increased risk (HR = 3.96, 95% CI 2.76-5.67, P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>By analyzing data from seven cycles (2005-2018) of the NHANES database, this study identified a positive association between the ALBI score and depression among U.S. adults. The ALBI score was also linked to the severity of depressive symptoms, and was associated with all-cause mortality, cancer-related mortality in individuals with depression.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinical trial number: not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9029,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychiatry","volume":"25 1","pages":"660"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-07082-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Depression has been recognized as a leading global contributor to disease burden and mortality. While the etiology of depression involves a complex interplay of biological, psychological, and social factors, its precise pathophysiological mechanisms remain incompletely understood. The albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score, originally developed as an objective measure of hepatic function, has demonstrated prognostic value in diverse clinical contexts including liver diseases, brain tumors and chronic heart failure. However, the relationship between ALBI scores and depression has not been systematically investigated. This study aims to examine the association between ALBI scores and depression in a nationally representative cohort.

Methods: This population-based cross-sectional study utilized data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) spanning seven survey cycles (2005-2018). The ALBI score was calculated using the established formula: ALBI = (log10 bilirubin [μmol/L] × 0.66) + (albumin [g/L] × -0.085). Depression was assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Weighted multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to analyze the association between ALBI and depression, adjusting for potential covariates. Nonlinear relationships were explored using restricted cubic splines (RCS). The robustness of the results was validated through subgroup analyses. The relationship between ALBI and depression symptoms severity was evaluated via ANOVA. For prognostic analysis, Cox proportional hazards regression models assessed the link between ALBI and clinical outcomes, complemented by Kaplan-Meier (K-M) survival curves and RCS plots to illustrate trends.

Results: Weighted multivariable logistic regression models revealed a significant association between elevated ALBI scores and depression risk. Participants in the higher ALBI (ALBI≧ -2.87) demonstrated 16% increased odds of depression compared to the reference (ALBI < -2.87) (adjusted OR = 1.16, 95% CI 1.03-1.31, P = 0.01). Restricted cubic spline analysis confirmed a linear relationship between continuous ALBI scores and depression risk. Subgroup analyses stratified by age, gender, race, education, smoking, drinking and diabetes consistently identified high ALBI as an independent risk factor for depression. The analysis of variance revealed a significant dose-response relationship between ALBI and depression symptom severity (P < 0.05). Cox proportional hazards models revealed significant associations between ALBI increments and mortality risks in the depression cohort. For all-cause mortality, each 1-unit ALBI elevation was associated with a 284% increased risk (adjusted HR = 3.84, 95% CI 2.77-5.33, P < 0.01). Cancer-related mortality showed a 235% risk escalation per ALBI unit (HR = 3.35, 95% CI 1.54-7.26, P < 0.01), while non-cancer deaths exhibited an stronger association at 296% increased risk (HR = 3.96, 95% CI 2.76-5.67, P < 0.01).

Conclusion: By analyzing data from seven cycles (2005-2018) of the NHANES database, this study identified a positive association between the ALBI score and depression among U.S. adults. The ALBI score was also linked to the severity of depressive symptoms, and was associated with all-cause mortality, cancer-related mortality in individuals with depression.

Trial registration: Clinical trial number: not applicable.

NHANES 2005-2018数据显示,白蛋白-胆红素得分高与抑郁症有关。
背景:抑郁症已被公认为全球疾病负担和死亡率的主要贡献者。虽然抑郁症的病因涉及生物、心理和社会因素的复杂相互作用,但其确切的病理生理机制仍不完全清楚。白蛋白-胆红素(ALBI)评分最初是作为一种客观的肝功能指标而开发的,在多种临床情况下,包括肝病、脑肿瘤和慢性心力衰竭,已经证明了其预后价值。然而,ALBI评分与抑郁症之间的关系尚未得到系统的研究。本研究旨在检验ALBI评分与抑郁之间的关系,在一个具有全国代表性的队列中。方法:这项基于人群的横断面研究利用了全国健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)跨越七个调查周期(2005-2018)的数据。采用建立的公式计算ALBI评分:ALBI = (log10胆红素[μmol/L] × 0.66) +(白蛋白[g/L] × -0.085)。使用患者健康问卷-9 (PHQ-9)评估抑郁症。构建加权多变量logistic回归模型,对潜在协变量进行调整,分析ALBI与抑郁症之间的关系。利用限制三次样条(RCS)研究了非线性关系。通过亚组分析验证了结果的稳健性。通过方差分析评估ALBI与抑郁症状严重程度的关系。对于预后分析,Cox比例风险回归模型评估了ALBI与临床结果之间的联系,并辅以Kaplan-Meier (K-M)生存曲线和RCS图来说明趋势。结果:加权多变量logistic回归模型显示ALBI评分升高与抑郁风险显著相关。结论:通过分析NHANES数据库七个周期(2005-2018)的数据,本研究确定了美国成年人ALBI评分与抑郁症之间的正相关关系。ALBI评分还与抑郁症状的严重程度有关,并与抑郁症患者的全因死亡率、癌症相关死亡率有关。试验注册:临床试验编号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Psychiatry
BMC Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychiatry is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of psychiatric disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信