Predict status of axillary lymph node after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with dual-energy CT in breast cancer.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Zhen Wang, Zhao-Qing Fan, Li-Ze Wang, Kun Cao, Rong Long, Yao Luo, Xiao-Ting Li, Liang You, Qing-Yang Li, Ying-Shi Sun
{"title":"Predict status of axillary lymph node after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with dual-energy CT in breast cancer.","authors":"Zhen Wang, Zhao-Qing Fan, Li-Ze Wang, Kun Cao, Rong Long, Yao Luo, Xiao-Ting Li, Liang You, Qing-Yang Li, Ying-Shi Sun","doi":"10.1186/s12880-025-01799-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A proportion of breast patients achieve axillary pathological complete response (pCR) following NAC. However, few studies have investigated the potential of quantitative parameters derived from dual-energy CT (DECT) for predicting axillary lymph node (ALN) downstaging after NAC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included a prospective training and retrospective validation cohort from December 2019 to June 2022. Both groups enrolled invasive breast cancer with biopsy-proved metastatic ALNs who underwent contrast-enhanced DECT and NAC followed by surgery. A metastatic ALN, named target lymph node (TLN), was marked with metal clip at baseline. Quantitative DECT parameters and size of TLN, and clinical information were compared between pCR and non-pCR node group referring to postoperative pathology. Three predictive models, clinical, quantitative CT, and combinational models, were built by logistic regression and nomogram was drawn accordingly. The performance was evaluated by the receiver operator characteristic curve and clinical usefulness was assessed by decision curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 75 and 53 patients were included in training and validation cohort respectively. Of them, 34 (45.3%) and 22 (41.5%) patients achieved nodal pCR in the two sets. Multivariable analyses revealed that negative estrogen receptor expression, parenchyma thickness and the iodine concentration of TLN at post-NAC CT were independently predictive factors for pCR. The combinational model showed discriminatory power than the single clinical model (AUC, 0.724; p = 0.003) and quantitative CT model (AUC, 0.728; p = 0.030) with AUC of 0.847 and 0.828 in training and validation cohort. It provided enhanced net benefits within a wide range of threshold probabilities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Quantitative DECT parameters can be used to evaluate axillary nodal status after NAC and guide personalized treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":9020,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Imaging","volume":"25 1","pages":"233"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12220156/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-025-01799-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A proportion of breast patients achieve axillary pathological complete response (pCR) following NAC. However, few studies have investigated the potential of quantitative parameters derived from dual-energy CT (DECT) for predicting axillary lymph node (ALN) downstaging after NAC.

Methods: This study included a prospective training and retrospective validation cohort from December 2019 to June 2022. Both groups enrolled invasive breast cancer with biopsy-proved metastatic ALNs who underwent contrast-enhanced DECT and NAC followed by surgery. A metastatic ALN, named target lymph node (TLN), was marked with metal clip at baseline. Quantitative DECT parameters and size of TLN, and clinical information were compared between pCR and non-pCR node group referring to postoperative pathology. Three predictive models, clinical, quantitative CT, and combinational models, were built by logistic regression and nomogram was drawn accordingly. The performance was evaluated by the receiver operator characteristic curve and clinical usefulness was assessed by decision curve analysis.

Results: A total of 75 and 53 patients were included in training and validation cohort respectively. Of them, 34 (45.3%) and 22 (41.5%) patients achieved nodal pCR in the two sets. Multivariable analyses revealed that negative estrogen receptor expression, parenchyma thickness and the iodine concentration of TLN at post-NAC CT were independently predictive factors for pCR. The combinational model showed discriminatory power than the single clinical model (AUC, 0.724; p = 0.003) and quantitative CT model (AUC, 0.728; p = 0.030) with AUC of 0.847 and 0.828 in training and validation cohort. It provided enhanced net benefits within a wide range of threshold probabilities.

Conclusion: Quantitative DECT parameters can be used to evaluate axillary nodal status after NAC and guide personalized treatment strategies.

双能CT预测乳腺癌新辅助化疗后腋窝淋巴结状况。
背景:一部分乳腺癌患者在NAC后达到腋窝病理完全缓解(pCR)。然而,很少有研究探讨双能CT (DECT)定量参数预测NAC后腋窝淋巴结(ALN)降期的潜力。方法:本研究包括2019年12月至2022年6月的前瞻性培训和回顾性验证队列。两组患者均为浸润性乳腺癌,经活检证实为转移性aln,并接受造影增强DECT和NAC,随后进行手术。转移性ALN,命名为靶淋巴结(TLN),在基线用金属夹标记。参照术后病理,比较pCR与非pCR淋巴结组的定量DECT参数、TLN大小及临床信息。采用logistic回归方法建立临床模型、定量CT模型和组合模型3种预测模型,并绘制nomogram。采用受试者特征曲线评价疗效,采用决策曲线分析评价临床疗效。结果:训练组和验证组分别纳入75例和53例患者。两组患者中分别有34例(45.3%)和22例(41.5%)实现了结节pCR。多变量分析显示,nac后CT上雌激素受体的负表达、软组织厚度和TLN的碘浓度是pCR的独立预测因素。组合模型比单一临床模型具有区分力(AUC, 0.724;p = 0.003)和定量CT模型(AUC, 0.728;p = 0.030),训练组和验证组的AUC分别为0.847和0.828。它在广泛的阈值概率范围内提供了增强的净效益。结论:定量DECT参数可用于评价NAC后腋窝淋巴结状态,指导个性化治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Imaging
BMC Medical Imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
198
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Imaging is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the development, evaluation, and use of imaging techniques and image processing tools to diagnose and manage disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信