Lu Wang, Gaowa Jin, Wenjuan Wang, Jun Zhao, Feng Chen, Xiaorong Li, Ying Jiang, Zewei Zhang, Quanfu Li
{"title":"Fosaprepitant for the prevention of multiple-day cisplatin chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a prospective randomized controlled study.","authors":"Lu Wang, Gaowa Jin, Wenjuan Wang, Jun Zhao, Feng Chen, Xiaorong Li, Ying Jiang, Zewei Zhang, Quanfu Li","doi":"10.1186/s40360-025-00964-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of fosaprepitant plus triple therapy versus triple therapy alone, in terms of both routine and delayed regimen, in preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients receiving three-day cisplatin-based treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a prospective randomized controlled trial, patients undergoing three-day cisplatin-based chemotherapy (25mg/m<sup>2</sup>/day) received fosaprepitant plus triple therapy or triple therapy alone on day 1 (routine regimen). For the evaluation of the delayed regimen, the administration of fosaprepitant and/or olanzapine was delayed for 1 day. Efficacy and safety in overall phase (OP) were evaluated within 5 days after initiation of chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fosaprepitant plus triple therapy achieved a higher total protection (TP) rate during OP than triple therapy alone (56.9% vs. 40.4%; P = 0.018). Fosaprepitant plus triple therapy also produced a higher TP rate than triple therapy alone during delay phase (DP) (57.8% vs. 40.4%; P = 0.012) but not during acute phase (AP) (88.2% vs. 86.5%; P = 0.714). In addition, fosaprepitant plus triple therapy achieved higher complete response (CR) rates than triple therapy alone during DP, but not during AP. The delayed regimen appeared to have produced higher TP and CR rates than the routine regimen, but the differences were not statistically significant. The Kaplan-Meier curves showed that fosaprepitant plus triple therapy delayed the first vomiting.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Fosaprepitant plus triple therapy demonstrated superiority over triple therapy alone for CINV control in patients receiving three-day cisplatin-based treatment.</p><p><strong>Clinical trials registration: </strong>This trial was registered in the China Clinical Trials Registry on December 8, 2020 (chiCTR2000040675).</p>","PeriodicalId":9023,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology","volume":"26 1","pages":"126"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12210530/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40360-025-00964-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of fosaprepitant plus triple therapy versus triple therapy alone, in terms of both routine and delayed regimen, in preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients receiving three-day cisplatin-based treatment.
Methods: In a prospective randomized controlled trial, patients undergoing three-day cisplatin-based chemotherapy (25mg/m2/day) received fosaprepitant plus triple therapy or triple therapy alone on day 1 (routine regimen). For the evaluation of the delayed regimen, the administration of fosaprepitant and/or olanzapine was delayed for 1 day. Efficacy and safety in overall phase (OP) were evaluated within 5 days after initiation of chemotherapy.
Results: Fosaprepitant plus triple therapy achieved a higher total protection (TP) rate during OP than triple therapy alone (56.9% vs. 40.4%; P = 0.018). Fosaprepitant plus triple therapy also produced a higher TP rate than triple therapy alone during delay phase (DP) (57.8% vs. 40.4%; P = 0.012) but not during acute phase (AP) (88.2% vs. 86.5%; P = 0.714). In addition, fosaprepitant plus triple therapy achieved higher complete response (CR) rates than triple therapy alone during DP, but not during AP. The delayed regimen appeared to have produced higher TP and CR rates than the routine regimen, but the differences were not statistically significant. The Kaplan-Meier curves showed that fosaprepitant plus triple therapy delayed the first vomiting.
Conclusions: Fosaprepitant plus triple therapy demonstrated superiority over triple therapy alone for CINV control in patients receiving three-day cisplatin-based treatment.
Clinical trials registration: This trial was registered in the China Clinical Trials Registry on December 8, 2020 (chiCTR2000040675).
目的:我们的目的是比较磷酸沙匹坦加三联治疗与单联治疗的有效性和安全性,在常规和延迟方案方面,预防化疗引起的恶心和呕吐(CINV)在接受三天顺铂治疗的患者。方法:在一项前瞻性随机对照试验中,接受3天顺铂化疗(25mg/m2/天)的患者在第1天(常规方案)接受福沙吡坦加三联治疗或单独三联治疗。为了评估延迟治疗方案,氟沙吡坦和/或奥氮平的给药延迟1天。化疗开始后5天内评价总期(OP)的疗效和安全性。结果:Fosaprepitant联合三联治疗在OP期间的总保护率(TP)高于单用三联治疗(56.9% vs 40.4%;p = 0.018)。在延迟期(DP),福沙吡坦加三联治疗也比单独三联治疗产生更高的TP率(57.8% vs 40.4%;P = 0.012),但急性期(AP)无统计学意义(88.2% vs. 86.5%;p = 0.714)。此外,在DP期间,磷沙匹坦加三联治疗比单独三联治疗获得更高的完全缓解(CR)率,但在AP期间没有。延迟方案似乎比常规方案产生更高的TP和CR率,但差异无统计学意义。Kaplan-Meier曲线显示,氟沙吡坦加三联治疗延迟了首次呕吐。结论:在接受为期三天的顺铂治疗的患者中,福沙吡坦加三联疗法在控制CINV方面优于单用三联疗法。临床试验注册:该试验已于2020年12月8日在中国临床试验注册中心注册(chiCTR2000040675)。
期刊介绍:
BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of chemically defined therapeutic and toxic agents. The journal welcomes submissions from all fields of experimental and clinical pharmacology including clinical trials and toxicology.