Validity and Reliability of the Revised Skin Management Needs Assessment Checklist: A Methodological Study.

IF 1.7 4区医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY

Advances in Skin & Wound Care Pub Date : 2025-06-30 DOI:10.1097/ASW.0000000000000318

Seda Şahan, Günay Elif İsmailoğlu, Eda Ergin, Emine Korkmaz

{"title":"Validity and Reliability of the Revised Skin Management Needs Assessment Checklist: A Methodological Study.","authors":"Seda Şahan, Günay Elif İsmailoğlu, Eda Ergin, Emine Korkmaz","doi":"10.1097/ASW.0000000000000318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Objective: This study was conducted to adapt the revised Skin Management Needs Assessment Checklist (SMnac) into Turkish and determine the reliability and validity by using the Rasch model.Methods: Data were collected between February and July 2023 from a total of 201 patients using a demographics and clinical history form, Braden Scale, and the revised SMnac. This methodological study used forward translation, expert opinion, back translation, pilot test, and finalization for the language adaptation of the instrument. The feasibility of the questionnaire for the Turkish population with pressure injury was assessed through the Rasch measurement model. Internal consistency reliability with Rasch analysis was calculated with the Person Reliability Index and Item Reliability Index. For content validity, the first Turkish version was evaluated by seven experts.Results: The Content Validity Index of the Turkish version of the revised SMnac was determined to be 0.87. In the Rasch analysis, the person reliability coefficient was detected as 0.87 and the item reliability coefficient as 0.94. In accordance with the results of the adaptation and reliability validity analyses of the original scale, three items were excluded from the scale.Conclusions: According to the results of the study, the revised SMnac scale was determined to be valid and reliable in Turkish.","PeriodicalId":7489,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Skin & Wound Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Skin & Wound Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ASW.0000000000000318","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective: This study was conducted to adapt the revised Skin Management Needs Assessment Checklist (SMnac) into Turkish and determine the reliability and validity by using the Rasch model.

Methods: Data were collected between February and July 2023 from a total of 201 patients using a demographics and clinical history form, Braden Scale, and the revised SMnac. This methodological study used forward translation, expert opinion, back translation, pilot test, and finalization for the language adaptation of the instrument. The feasibility of the questionnaire for the Turkish population with pressure injury was assessed through the Rasch measurement model. Internal consistency reliability with Rasch analysis was calculated with the Person Reliability Index and Item Reliability Index. For content validity, the first Turkish version was evaluated by seven experts.

Results: The Content Validity Index of the Turkish version of the revised SMnac was determined to be 0.87. In the Rasch analysis, the person reliability coefficient was detected as 0.87 and the item reliability coefficient as 0.94. In accordance with the results of the adaptation and reliability validity analyses of the original scale, three items were excluded from the scale.

Conclusions: According to the results of the study, the revised SMnac scale was determined to be valid and reliable in Turkish.

查看原文本刊更多论文

修订皮肤管理需求评估清单的效度与信度：一项方法学研究。

摘要：目的：本研究将修订后的《皮肤管理需求评估清单》（SMnac）翻译为土耳其语，并采用Rasch模型确定信度和效度。方法：数据收集于2023年2月至7月，共201例患者，使用人口统计学和临床病史表、Braden量表和修订后的SMnac。本研究采用正向翻译、专家意见、反向翻译、先导测试、定稿等方法对仪器进行语言适配。通过Rasch测量模型评估问卷对土耳其压力性损伤人群的可行性。内部一致性信度采用Rasch分析，采用人信度指数和项目信度指数计算。在内容有效性方面，第一个土耳其语版本由7位专家进行了评估。结果：经修订的土耳其语版SMnac的内容效度指数为0.87。在Rasch分析中，人的信度系数为0.87，项目的信度系数为0.94。根据原量表的适应性和信度效度分析结果，从量表中剔除了三个条目。结论：根据研究结果，修订后的SMnac量表在土耳其语中是有效和可靠的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Advances in Skin & Wound Care DERMATOLOGY-NURSING

CiteScore

2.50

自引率

12.50%

发文量

271

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： A peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal, Advances in Skin & Wound Care is highly regarded for its unique balance of cutting-edge original research and practical clinical management articles on wounds and other problems of skin integrity. Each issue features CME/CE for physicians and nurses, the first journal in the field to regularly offer continuing education for both disciplines.