Differences in pain, bleeding, and satisfaction during medical abortion at very early gestations.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Frida Gyllenberg, Karin Brandell, Tagrid Jar-Allah, Helena Kopp Kallner, John Reynolds-Wright, Clare Boerma, Sharon Cameron, Helena Hognert, Oskari Heikinheimo, Janina Kaislasuo, Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson
{"title":"Differences in pain, bleeding, and satisfaction during medical abortion at very early gestations.","authors":"Frida Gyllenberg, Karin Brandell, Tagrid Jar-Allah, Helena Kopp Kallner, John Reynolds-Wright, Clare Boerma, Sharon Cameron, Helena Hognert, Oskari Heikinheimo, Janina Kaislasuo, Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson","doi":"10.1111/aogs.15177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Little is known regarding the impact of gestation on pain, bleeding duration, and satisfaction in early medical abortion (termination of pregnancy). This study aimed to determine if pain experience, bleeding duration, and overall satisfaction with medical abortion differed across four ultrasound-defined categories of early pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This is a secondary analysis of the multicenter VEMA-trial, a randomized clinical trial on the efficacy and safety of very early medical abortion before confirming pregnancy location (the VEMA-trial, EudraCT 2018-003675-35, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03989869). The present study included participants with normally developing pregnancies and known abortion outcomes, including complete abortion, incomplete abortion, and ongoing pregnancy, that is, pregnancy still progressing after medical abortion. Participants were grouped by ultrasound findings at the time of abortion into pregnancy of unknown location, early, normally sited pregnancy (empty sac), and normally sited pregnancy with visible yolk sac or visible embryo. Pain experience was measured on the 0-10 numeric rating scale (higher values for more pain), duration of bleeding in days, and satisfaction on a 0-6 scale (higher values indicating greater satisfaction).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Altogether 1253 participants were included: 18% (224 participants) with pregnancy of unknown location, 38% (476) with early, normally sited pregnancy, 24% (301) with visible yolk sac, and 20% (252) with visible embryo. Pain scores were lowest in the pregnancy of unknown location group (mean 5.2 ± SD 2.3) and highest in the pregnancy with visible embryo group (6.2 ± 2.4). Bleeding duration was shortest for pregnancies of unknown location (4.9 ± 3.2) and longest for those with visible embryo (7.5 ± 5.3). Mean satisfaction was over 5 in all groups, highest in early, normally sited pregnancies (5.7 ± 0.7). In regression analyses, both pain scores and bleeding duration increased with advancing ultrasound findings. The pregnancy of unknown location group reported the least pain (1.02 points lower, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] -1.46 to -0.57) and the shortest bleeding duration (34% shorter, incidence rate ratio 0.66, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.71) compared to pregnancies with visible embryo.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>More advanced ultrasound findings are associated with higher pain scores and longer bleeding duration in very early medical abortion, whereas satisfaction is high across ultrasound-defined categories.</p>","PeriodicalId":6990,"journal":{"name":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.15177","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Little is known regarding the impact of gestation on pain, bleeding duration, and satisfaction in early medical abortion (termination of pregnancy). This study aimed to determine if pain experience, bleeding duration, and overall satisfaction with medical abortion differed across four ultrasound-defined categories of early pregnancy.

Material and methods: This is a secondary analysis of the multicenter VEMA-trial, a randomized clinical trial on the efficacy and safety of very early medical abortion before confirming pregnancy location (the VEMA-trial, EudraCT 2018-003675-35, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03989869). The present study included participants with normally developing pregnancies and known abortion outcomes, including complete abortion, incomplete abortion, and ongoing pregnancy, that is, pregnancy still progressing after medical abortion. Participants were grouped by ultrasound findings at the time of abortion into pregnancy of unknown location, early, normally sited pregnancy (empty sac), and normally sited pregnancy with visible yolk sac or visible embryo. Pain experience was measured on the 0-10 numeric rating scale (higher values for more pain), duration of bleeding in days, and satisfaction on a 0-6 scale (higher values indicating greater satisfaction).

Results: Altogether 1253 participants were included: 18% (224 participants) with pregnancy of unknown location, 38% (476) with early, normally sited pregnancy, 24% (301) with visible yolk sac, and 20% (252) with visible embryo. Pain scores were lowest in the pregnancy of unknown location group (mean 5.2 ± SD 2.3) and highest in the pregnancy with visible embryo group (6.2 ± 2.4). Bleeding duration was shortest for pregnancies of unknown location (4.9 ± 3.2) and longest for those with visible embryo (7.5 ± 5.3). Mean satisfaction was over 5 in all groups, highest in early, normally sited pregnancies (5.7 ± 0.7). In regression analyses, both pain scores and bleeding duration increased with advancing ultrasound findings. The pregnancy of unknown location group reported the least pain (1.02 points lower, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] -1.46 to -0.57) and the shortest bleeding duration (34% shorter, incidence rate ratio 0.66, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.71) compared to pregnancies with visible embryo.

Conclusions: More advanced ultrasound findings are associated with higher pain scores and longer bleeding duration in very early medical abortion, whereas satisfaction is high across ultrasound-defined categories.

妊娠早期药物流产的疼痛、出血和满意度差异。
引言:关于妊娠对早期药物流产(终止妊娠)的疼痛、出血持续时间和满意度的影响,我们知之甚少。本研究旨在确定四种超声定义的早期妊娠类别中药物流产的疼痛经历、出血持续时间和总体满意度是否存在差异。材料和方法:这是一项多中心vema试验的二次分析,该试验是一项在确定妊娠位置之前进行早期药物流产的疗效和安全性的随机临床试验(vema试验,EudraCT 2018-003675-35, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03989869)。本研究纳入了正常妊娠和已知流产结局的参与者,包括完全流产、不完全流产和持续妊娠,即药物流产后妊娠仍在继续。根据流产时的超声检查结果将参与者分为位置不明妊娠、早期妊娠、正常妊娠(空卵囊)和正常妊娠,可见卵黄囊或可见胚胎。疼痛体验以0-10的数值评定(数值越高表示疼痛越严重),出血天数以天为单位,满意度以0-6的数值评定(数值越高表示满意度越高)。结果:共纳入1253例受试者,其中18%(224例)妊娠位置不明,38%(476例)妊娠早期正常,24%(301例)可见卵黄囊,20%(252例)可见胚胎。妊娠部位未知组疼痛评分最低(平均5.2±2.3),妊娠可见组疼痛评分最高(平均6.2±2.4)。妊娠部位不明者出血时间最短(4.9±3.2),胚胎可见者最长(7.5±5.3)。各组平均满意度均在5以上,早期正常妊娠满意度最高(5.7±0.7)。在回归分析中,疼痛评分和出血持续时间随着超声检查的进展而增加。与可见胚胎妊娠相比,胎位不明组疼痛最小(低1.02点,95%可信区间[CI] -1.46 ~ -0.57),出血持续时间最短(短34%,发生率比0.66,95% CI 0.61 ~ 0.71)。结论:在早期药物流产中,超声检查越先进,疼痛评分越高,出血时间越长,而在超声定义的类别中满意度较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.70%
发文量
180
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Published monthly, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica is an international journal dedicated to providing the very latest information on the results of both clinical, basic and translational research work related to all aspects of women’s health from around the globe. The journal regularly publishes commentaries, reviews, and original articles on a wide variety of topics including: gynecology, pregnancy, birth, female urology, gynecologic oncology, fertility and reproductive biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信