Subpopulations with frequent healthcare barriers have increased risk of sexually transmitted infections and dropping out from HIV preexposure prophylaxis care.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
AIDS Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.1097/QAD.0000000000004224
Eline S Wijstma, Vita W Jongen, Anders Boyd, Henry J C De Vries, Maarten F Schim Van Der Loeff, Maria Prins, Elske Hoornenborg
{"title":"Subpopulations with frequent healthcare barriers have increased risk of sexually transmitted infections and dropping out from HIV preexposure prophylaxis care.","authors":"Eline S Wijstma, Vita W Jongen, Anders Boyd, Henry J C De Vries, Maarten F Schim Van Der Loeff, Maria Prins, Elske Hoornenborg","doi":"10.1097/QAD.0000000000004224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Certain subpopulations (i.e., <25 years, transgender, sex worker, uninsured or migrant) were prioritized for inclusion in the Dutch preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) pilot. We compared incidence of sexually transmitted infections (STI) during and drop-out from HIV PrEP care between prioritized and nonprioritized subpopulations.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective longitudinal study using routinely collected data at the Centre for Sexual Health Amsterdam, 2019-2024.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We modelled incidence rates (IR) for any STI while on PrEP using Poisson regression, adjusting for testing frequency and calendar time. We modelled the probability of early loss-to-follow-up (LTFU) (i.e., no PrEP follow-up visit within 12 months of enrolment) using logistic regression, adjusting for sexual behaviour. We modelled the probability of later LTFU (i.e., no PrEP visit within 12 months of a prior PrEP follow-up visit) using competing risk regression, adjusting for sexual behaviour. We added subpopulations as indicator variables to all models to compare endpoints between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 4781 individuals included (median age 32 years, IQR = 26-40), 50.2% ( n = 2402) belonged to prioritized subpopulations. The IR of any STI was 101.6/100 person-years. STI IR were higher among those belonging to prioritized groups (except for the transgender group). 494 individuals had early LTFU, which was associated with age <25 years, reporting sex work, and being a migrant. Later LTFU occurred 933 times and was associated with age <25 years, being transgender, and reporting sex work.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>People belonging to prioritized subpopulations had more STIs and were more often LTFU from PrEP care. Targeted interventions to support PrEP retention and prevent STIs are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":7502,"journal":{"name":"AIDS","volume":" ","pages":"1610-1620"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12337923/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIDS","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000004224","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Certain subpopulations (i.e., <25 years, transgender, sex worker, uninsured or migrant) were prioritized for inclusion in the Dutch preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) pilot. We compared incidence of sexually transmitted infections (STI) during and drop-out from HIV PrEP care between prioritized and nonprioritized subpopulations.

Design: Retrospective longitudinal study using routinely collected data at the Centre for Sexual Health Amsterdam, 2019-2024.

Methods: We modelled incidence rates (IR) for any STI while on PrEP using Poisson regression, adjusting for testing frequency and calendar time. We modelled the probability of early loss-to-follow-up (LTFU) (i.e., no PrEP follow-up visit within 12 months of enrolment) using logistic regression, adjusting for sexual behaviour. We modelled the probability of later LTFU (i.e., no PrEP visit within 12 months of a prior PrEP follow-up visit) using competing risk regression, adjusting for sexual behaviour. We added subpopulations as indicator variables to all models to compare endpoints between groups.

Results: Of 4781 individuals included (median age 32 years, IQR = 26-40), 50.2% ( n = 2402) belonged to prioritized subpopulations. The IR of any STI was 101.6/100 person-years. STI IR were higher among those belonging to prioritized groups (except for the transgender group). 494 individuals had early LTFU, which was associated with age <25 years, reporting sex work, and being a migrant. Later LTFU occurred 933 times and was associated with age <25 years, being transgender, and reporting sex work.

Conclusion: People belonging to prioritized subpopulations had more STIs and were more often LTFU from PrEP care. Targeted interventions to support PrEP retention and prevent STIs are needed.

经常有保健障碍的亚人群性传播感染的风险增加,并从艾滋病毒暴露前预防保健中退出。
目的:某些亚群(即设计:回顾性纵向研究,使用2019-2024年阿姆斯特丹性健康中心常规收集的数据。方法:我们使用泊松回归建模PrEP期间任何STI的发病率(IR),调整检测频率和日历时间。我们使用逻辑回归对早期随访缺失(LTFU)(即在入组后12个月内未进行PrEP随访)的概率进行建模,并对性行为进行调整。我们使用竞争风险回归模型,调整了性行为,模拟了后来LTFU(即在之前的PrEP随访后12个月内没有进行PrEP访问)的概率。我们将亚种群作为指标变量添加到所有模型中,以比较组间的终点。结果:在纳入的4,781例个体(中位年龄32岁,IQR=26-40)中,50.2% (n=2,402)属于优先亚群。任何STI的IR为101.6/100人年。在属于优先群体(跨性别群体除外)的人群中,STI IR较高。结论:属于优先亚群的人有更多的性传播感染,并且更经常从PrEP护理中获得LTFU。需要采取有针对性的干预措施,以支持预防措施的保留和预防性传播感染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AIDS
AIDS 医学-病毒学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
478
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Publishing the very latest ground breaking research on HIV and AIDS. Read by all the top clinicians and researchers, AIDS has the highest impact of all AIDS-related journals. With 18 issues per year, AIDS guarantees the authoritative presentation of significant advances. The Editors, themselves noted international experts who know the demands of your work, are committed to making AIDS the most distinguished and innovative journal in the field. Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信