Chaoyue Zhang, Lu Cheng, Xin Zhou, Shuiping Ouyang
{"title":"Comparative Evaluation of Dilute Acid, Alkaline, and Deep Eutectic Solvent Pretreatments on Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Sunflower Stalk Bark.","authors":"Chaoyue Zhang, Lu Cheng, Xin Zhou, Shuiping Ouyang","doi":"10.1007/s12010-025-05311-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this study, in order to overcome the recalcitrance of sunflower stalk bark (SSB) residues, three kinds of pretreatment methods, i.e., dilute acid pretreatment, alkaline pretreatment, and deep eutectic solvent (DES) pretreatment, were employed to pretreat the SSB material. The effects of the different pretreatment methods for enzymatic hydrolysis efficiency and sugar recovery were evaluated. The enzymatic hydrolysis yield (EHY) of SSB after dilute sulfuric acid, NaOH, and DES pretreatment could be improved from 15.2% to 26.8%, 96.7%, and 93.3%, respectively. Among the three pretreatment methods, dilute acid could effectively decompose hemicellulose while preserving more lignin in the pretreated solids, and it could only enhance EHY within a limited range (< 30%). Compared with dilute sulfuric acid pretreatment, NaOH and choline chloride/lactic acid pretreatments could effectively remove not only hemicellulose but also lignin. Results showed that satisfactory EHY (> 90%) was observed in both alkaline and DES pretreated SSB solids. Besides, DES method was much more efficient in the extraction of lignin (95%) compared with NaOH pretreatment (80.2%). Lignin could be recovery by DES pretreatment as value-added by-product from SSB and was more environmentally friendly and sustainable during production. Finally, under the condition of 1:10 (w/w) solid to DES solution and 150 °C pretreatment temperature, the mass balance of DES-150 °C showed that 28.1 g glucose was obtained from 100 g SSB, and the glucose recovery yield was 77.6% of theoretical, demonstrating the potential of environmentally friendly DESs in biorefinery.</p>","PeriodicalId":465,"journal":{"name":"Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-025-05311-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this study, in order to overcome the recalcitrance of sunflower stalk bark (SSB) residues, three kinds of pretreatment methods, i.e., dilute acid pretreatment, alkaline pretreatment, and deep eutectic solvent (DES) pretreatment, were employed to pretreat the SSB material. The effects of the different pretreatment methods for enzymatic hydrolysis efficiency and sugar recovery were evaluated. The enzymatic hydrolysis yield (EHY) of SSB after dilute sulfuric acid, NaOH, and DES pretreatment could be improved from 15.2% to 26.8%, 96.7%, and 93.3%, respectively. Among the three pretreatment methods, dilute acid could effectively decompose hemicellulose while preserving more lignin in the pretreated solids, and it could only enhance EHY within a limited range (< 30%). Compared with dilute sulfuric acid pretreatment, NaOH and choline chloride/lactic acid pretreatments could effectively remove not only hemicellulose but also lignin. Results showed that satisfactory EHY (> 90%) was observed in both alkaline and DES pretreated SSB solids. Besides, DES method was much more efficient in the extraction of lignin (95%) compared with NaOH pretreatment (80.2%). Lignin could be recovery by DES pretreatment as value-added by-product from SSB and was more environmentally friendly and sustainable during production. Finally, under the condition of 1:10 (w/w) solid to DES solution and 150 °C pretreatment temperature, the mass balance of DES-150 °C showed that 28.1 g glucose was obtained from 100 g SSB, and the glucose recovery yield was 77.6% of theoretical, demonstrating the potential of environmentally friendly DESs in biorefinery.
本研究为克服向日葵茎皮(SSB)残渣的难降解性,采用稀酸预处理、碱性预处理和深共熔溶剂(DES)预处理三种预处理方法对SSB材料进行预处理。考察了不同预处理方法对酶解效率和糖回收率的影响。经稀硫酸、NaOH和DES预处理后,SSB的酶解率分别由15.2%提高到26.8%、96.7%和93.3%。在三种预处理方法中,稀酸能有效分解半纤维素,同时在预处理固体中保留更多的木质素,而在碱性和DES预处理的SSB固体中,稀酸只能在有限范围内(90%)提高EHY。DES法提取木质素的效率(95%)高于NaOH预处理(80.2%)。木质素可以通过DES预处理作为木质素的增值副产物回收,并且在生产过程中更加环保和可持续。最后,在固体与DES溶液比例为1:10 (w/w)、预处理温度为150℃的条件下,对DES-150℃的质量平衡结果表明,100 g SSB可得28.1 g葡萄糖,葡萄糖的理论回收率为77.6%,证明了环境友好型DESs在生物炼制中的潜力。
期刊介绍:
This journal is devoted to publishing the highest quality innovative papers in the fields of biochemistry and biotechnology. The typical focus of the journal is to report applications of novel scientific and technological breakthroughs, as well as technological subjects that are still in the proof-of-concept stage. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology provides a forum for case studies and practical concepts of biotechnology, utilization, including controls, statistical data analysis, problem descriptions unique to a particular application, and bioprocess economic analyses. The journal publishes reviews deemed of interest to readers, as well as book reviews, meeting and symposia notices, and news items relating to biotechnology in both the industrial and academic communities.
In addition, Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology often publishes lists of patents and publications of special interest to readers.