Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy coupled with machine learning for rapid quantification of Escherichia coli concentration.

IF 6.1 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Talanta Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-27 DOI:10.1016/j.talanta.2025.128522
Jingjing Wang, Jiahui Liang, Fei Chen, Runheng Yu, Zhihui Tian, Yang Zhao, Weiguang Ma, Lei Dong, Jiaxuan Li, Wangbao Yin, Liantuan Xiao, Suotang Jia, Lei Zhang
{"title":"Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy coupled with machine learning for rapid quantification of Escherichia coli concentration.","authors":"Jingjing Wang, Jiahui Liang, Fei Chen, Runheng Yu, Zhihui Tian, Yang Zhao, Weiguang Ma, Lei Dong, Jiaxuan Li, Wangbao Yin, Liantuan Xiao, Suotang Jia, Lei Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.talanta.2025.128522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The rapid and accurate quantification of bacterial concentrations is essential for food safety monitoring, environmental surveillance, and clinical diagnostics. Traditional methods are often limited by lengthy procedures, complex operations, or high costs. This study developed a novel approach combing laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) with machine learning for rapid bacterial concentration analysis. Using Escherichia coli (E. coli) as a model organism, we systematically optimized key LIBS parameters including delay time, substrate material, and laser repetition rate to achieve optimal spectral quality. Three machine learning algorithms - support vector regression (SVR), gradient boosting regression (GBR), and kernel ridge regression (KRR) - were comparatively evaluated. The SVR model demonstrated superior performance with a coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>) of 0.99, along with root mean square error (RMSE) of 7.3 × 10<sup>5</sup> cells/mL and mean absolute error (MAE) of 4.2 × 10<sup>5</sup> cells/mL, respectively. Method validation showed recovery rates ranging from 100.03 % to 100.83 %, with relative standard deviations (RSD) less than 2 %. The t-test confirmed no significant difference between the spiked concentrations and the detected concentrations (p > 0.05), indicating that the method possesses excellent accuracy and precision. This multi-feature integration approach effectively addressed the nonlinear correlation between spectral line intensity and bacterial concentration in LIBS quantification. The method offers significant advantages including minimal sample preparation and rapid analysis speed. These findings establish a reliable and efficient technique for microbial quantification with promising applications in food production facilities, healthcare settings, and ecological studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":435,"journal":{"name":"Talanta","volume":"296 ","pages":"128522"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Talanta","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2025.128522","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rapid and accurate quantification of bacterial concentrations is essential for food safety monitoring, environmental surveillance, and clinical diagnostics. Traditional methods are often limited by lengthy procedures, complex operations, or high costs. This study developed a novel approach combing laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) with machine learning for rapid bacterial concentration analysis. Using Escherichia coli (E. coli) as a model organism, we systematically optimized key LIBS parameters including delay time, substrate material, and laser repetition rate to achieve optimal spectral quality. Three machine learning algorithms - support vector regression (SVR), gradient boosting regression (GBR), and kernel ridge regression (KRR) - were comparatively evaluated. The SVR model demonstrated superior performance with a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.99, along with root mean square error (RMSE) of 7.3 × 105 cells/mL and mean absolute error (MAE) of 4.2 × 105 cells/mL, respectively. Method validation showed recovery rates ranging from 100.03 % to 100.83 %, with relative standard deviations (RSD) less than 2 %. The t-test confirmed no significant difference between the spiked concentrations and the detected concentrations (p > 0.05), indicating that the method possesses excellent accuracy and precision. This multi-feature integration approach effectively addressed the nonlinear correlation between spectral line intensity and bacterial concentration in LIBS quantification. The method offers significant advantages including minimal sample preparation and rapid analysis speed. These findings establish a reliable and efficient technique for microbial quantification with promising applications in food production facilities, healthcare settings, and ecological studies.

激光诱导击穿光谱结合机器学习快速定量大肠杆菌浓度。
快速准确地定量细菌浓度对食品安全监测、环境监测和临床诊断至关重要。传统的方法往往受到冗长的程序、复杂的操作或高成本的限制。本研究开发了一种将激光诱导击穿光谱(LIBS)与机器学习相结合的新方法,用于快速细菌浓度分析。以大肠杆菌为模型生物,系统优化LIBS关键参数,包括延迟时间、衬底材料和激光重复率,以获得最佳的光谱质量。对支持向量回归(SVR)、梯度增强回归(GBR)和核脊回归(KRR)三种机器学习算法进行了比较评价。SVR模型的决定系数(R2)为0.99,均方根误差(RMSE)为7.3 × 105 cells/mL,平均绝对误差(MAE)为4.2 × 105 cells/mL。方法验证回收率为100.03% ~ 100.83%,相对标准偏差(RSD)小于2%。经t检验,加标浓度与检测浓度无显著差异(p < 0.05),说明该方法具有良好的准确度和精密度。该多特征集成方法有效地解决了LIBS定量中谱线强度与细菌浓度之间的非线性关系。该方法具有显著的优点,包括最少的样品制备和快速的分析速度。这些发现建立了一种可靠和有效的微生物定量技术,在食品生产设施、卫生保健环境和生态研究中具有前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Talanta
Talanta 化学-分析化学
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
4.90%
发文量
861
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: Talanta provides a forum for the publication of original research papers, short communications, and critical reviews in all branches of pure and applied analytical chemistry. Papers are evaluated based on established guidelines, including the fundamental nature of the study, scientific novelty, substantial improvement or advantage over existing technology or methods, and demonstrated analytical applicability. Original research papers on fundamental studies, and on novel sensor and instrumentation developments, are encouraged. Novel or improved applications in areas such as clinical and biological chemistry, environmental analysis, geochemistry, materials science and engineering, and analytical platforms for omics development are welcome. Analytical performance of methods should be determined, including interference and matrix effects, and methods should be validated by comparison with a standard method, or analysis of a certified reference material. Simple spiking recoveries may not be sufficient. The developed method should especially comprise information on selectivity, sensitivity, detection limits, accuracy, and reliability. However, applying official validation or robustness studies to a routine method or technique does not necessarily constitute novelty. Proper statistical treatment of the data should be provided. Relevant literature should be cited, including related publications by the authors, and authors should discuss how their proposed methodology compares with previously reported methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信