Systematic Assessment of Coulombic Efficiency in Anode-Free and Lithium Metal Batteries.

IF 10.7 2区 材料科学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Mingzhu Guan, Zengwu Wei, Rui Liu, Xufeng Yan, Shanshan Sun, Mingjiong Zhou, Snežana Papović, Kun Zheng, Zoran Mandić, Xing Xin
{"title":"Systematic Assessment of Coulombic Efficiency in Anode-Free and Lithium Metal Batteries.","authors":"Mingzhu Guan, Zengwu Wei, Rui Liu, Xufeng Yan, Shanshan Sun, Mingjiong Zhou, Snežana Papović, Kun Zheng, Zoran Mandić, Xing Xin","doi":"10.1002/smtd.202500923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Driven by the demand for high-energy-density storage, Lithium metal batteries (LMBs) and anode-free Lithium metal batteries (AFLMBs) have attracted significant attention due to their high theoretical capacity and low reduction potential. However, achieving reproducible Coulombic Efficiency (CE) measurements remains a challenge due to inconsistencies in electrochemical protocols and experimental conditions. This study systematically evaluates and compares three CE measurement methodologies, identifying key factors that influence reproducibility and accuracy. Unlike previous studies, which often report CE values without considering their methodological limitations, the impact of electrolyte composition, electrolyte concentration, and electrode surface properties are highlighted on CE variations. Furthermore, this study demonstrates that a pre-cycling Li reservoir method effectively minimizes substrate effects, leading to the most sensitive measurements across various testing conditions. This work provides a standardized framework for CE evaluation in LMBs and AFLMBs, offering valuable insights for optimizing Li-free anode interfaces and accelerating the commercialization of high-performance LMBs.</p>","PeriodicalId":229,"journal":{"name":"Small Methods","volume":" ","pages":"e2500923"},"PeriodicalIF":10.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Small Methods","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/smtd.202500923","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Driven by the demand for high-energy-density storage, Lithium metal batteries (LMBs) and anode-free Lithium metal batteries (AFLMBs) have attracted significant attention due to their high theoretical capacity and low reduction potential. However, achieving reproducible Coulombic Efficiency (CE) measurements remains a challenge due to inconsistencies in electrochemical protocols and experimental conditions. This study systematically evaluates and compares three CE measurement methodologies, identifying key factors that influence reproducibility and accuracy. Unlike previous studies, which often report CE values without considering their methodological limitations, the impact of electrolyte composition, electrolyte concentration, and electrode surface properties are highlighted on CE variations. Furthermore, this study demonstrates that a pre-cycling Li reservoir method effectively minimizes substrate effects, leading to the most sensitive measurements across various testing conditions. This work provides a standardized framework for CE evaluation in LMBs and AFLMBs, offering valuable insights for optimizing Li-free anode interfaces and accelerating the commercialization of high-performance LMBs.

无阳极电池和锂金属电池库仑效率的系统评价。
在高能量密度存储需求的推动下,锂金属电池(lmb)和无阳极锂金属电池(aflmb)因其高理论容量和低还原电位而备受关注。然而,由于电化学协议和实验条件的不一致性,实现可重复的库仑效率(CE)测量仍然是一个挑战。本研究系统地评估和比较了三种CE测量方法,确定了影响再现性和准确性的关键因素。与以往的研究不同,以前的研究经常报告CE值而不考虑其方法局限性,电解质成分,电解质浓度和电极表面性质对CE变化的影响被强调。此外,本研究表明,预循环锂储层方法有效地减少了基质效应,从而在各种测试条件下实现了最灵敏的测量。这项工作为lmb和aflmb的CE评估提供了一个标准化的框架,为优化无锂阳极界面和加速高性能lmb的商业化提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Small Methods
Small Methods Materials Science-General Materials Science
CiteScore
17.40
自引率
1.60%
发文量
347
期刊介绍: Small Methods is a multidisciplinary journal that publishes groundbreaking research on methods relevant to nano- and microscale research. It welcomes contributions from the fields of materials science, biomedical science, chemistry, and physics, showcasing the latest advancements in experimental techniques. With a notable 2022 Impact Factor of 12.4 (Journal Citation Reports, Clarivate Analytics, 2023), Small Methods is recognized for its significant impact on the scientific community. The online ISSN for Small Methods is 2366-9608.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信